Posted on 09/29/2018 5:55:32 PM PDT by iontheball
During testimony Thursday in front of Senate Judiciary Committee Christine Ford identified herself as a “Research Psychologist” at the Stanford School of Medicine. However a search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau produced NO RESULTS for Christine Ford or deviations of her name. Earlier this week NPR explained why they don’t call Christine Ford a doctor because they reserve the title of “Dr.” for an individual who holds a doctor of dental surgery, medicine, optometry, osteopathic medicine, podiatric medicine or veterinary medicine. Sadly. Democrat Party’s Attempt to File Charges Against Judge Kavanaugh in State of Maryland Are Quickly Rebuffed. That was a smart move. There are no state records that show Ford is a licensed psychologist. This is another direct hit on Ford’s credibility.
Now this…
The Christine Blasey Ford bio page on the Stanford website was altered earlier this month.
The bio page used to look like this — Christine Blasey is given title of Research Psychologist.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
DR. Ford is a FRAUD!!! She needs to be brought to JUSTICE!
Wasn’t Nidal Hassan the Fort Hood known wolf jihadist a ‘doctor’?
Now is this true or not? What significance is this?
I’m not sure how I know if this is true or not? Is Gateway Pundit a reliable source? Before I get too excited...
On the wayback page:
This calendar view maps the number of times https://profiles.stanford.edu/christine-blasey was crawled by the Wayback Machine, not how many times the site was actually updated.
they crawled it a lot, but it didn’t change.
This, along with the very thorough scrubbing of Ford’s social media accounts and the vanishing of her yearbook from the internet underscore the fact that Ford was part of a long-planned political hit. She wasn’t the frightened, reluctant victim forced to come forward by circumstances beyond her control. Either she has been in on this for months (my guess), or Democrat operatives have been setting this up for months behind her back.
I only wish there was an FBI investigation going on into these matters...
To say the least, GP has a tarnished reputation.
Is her “PhD” in education or psychology? My hubby claims that some claim to be a PhD with only an EdD to climb the ladder. Has run across many of them in job interviews. Many from obscure, online colleges.
I first saw this on Milo Yiannaopolis’ website, “Dangerous.”
Read the whole thing and they show you the way to check her license (none)
and the screen shots of the Stanford faculty website. Gateway Pundit got this from Milo, I believe.
But no where can I find him actually being referred to as Dr.
To my knowledge the woman has not been approved by the State of California to practice psychology, and thus cannot legally call herself a Psychologist — regardless of the fact that she has a Ph.D. She is, as stated elsewhere, a statistician in a psychology department at the relatively unknown Palo Alto Univesity.
HOLY CRAP! Hoft is a moron.
In California the only time you need to be licensed as a psychologist is if you are in clinical practise. She couldn’t qualify for that since she doesn’t have a PsyD she has a PhD in a research field
A PhD is a “Dr” in the most formal sense. Even an ED is a doctor. These are post graduate degrees and the title is accurate.
But in a medical setting, a PhD is perceived to be lower on the scale and as a matter of convenience they are not “titled” the same way to avoid confusion.
She is not a practicing psychologist. Nor has she ever stated that she was.
She is closer to a statistician dealing with studies on experimental medical testing.
It doesn’t mean she is lying becuase no one is willing to read a full article or understand how higher education works.
It also doesn’t mean I believe anything she said in the Senate.
Its not as if she hasn't given enough to show she's either lying or being used. Publishing stories likes this without checking a dictionary first makes us look as dumb as the left thinks we are.
There are other exempted settings contained in the Code.
Now Now Now this don’t count if your a Democrat or a liberal. You’ll should know that!
But has the “media” stated she was a PhD?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.