Posted on 09/25/2018 6:02:15 PM PDT by davikkm
Motto: ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies)
If I am not mistaken, this Schumer character, who, amazingly enough, serves as Senate Minority Leader, is a trained lawyer. I wonder where he went to school, and what would his professors have to say about him if they were alive today. Here’s Chuck Schumer on Tuesday, during a presser, saying that SCOTUS nominee Kavanaugh is a non-person, as one of the fundamental principles in common law do not apply to him, i.e. he can’t benefit from the presumption of innocence. Since he’s a straight white man, and apparently a conservative, Judge Kavanaugh must be presumed to be guilty by mere accusation, hence he must prove his innocence before the leftist inquisition. Which is so dumb, I wonder how this guy can find his way home without a GPS. Maybe that’s why he has a personal driver, but I am already ranting. Here’s the video:
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
Schumer is guilty of being a serial schmuck.
Thanks to the RATs like Schumer, we’re living in 1984.
Hanson was just on Tucker Carlson’s show. Check this out:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-nomination-battle-like-orwells-1984/
The Marxist RATs want power so badly they don’t care if they destroy our Constitution and our nation.
The elimination of the presumption of innocence is the first step in forming a kangaroo court.
schemer’s desperation has him speaking in gibberish.
Schumer is a putz beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Marxist RATs want power so badly they don’t care if they destroy our Constitution and our nation.
Makes one wonder what their plans were had Hillary won. It wouldn’t have been pretty, or fun to live through.
“Hanson was just on Tucker Carlson’s show. Check this out:”
Yes, and I missed part of his segment because Carlson had some liberal piece of $hit on before him and I had to switch channels to save my big screen. The one thing I love with Lou Dobbs above all else is that he has no Liberal trash on his show. His guests are there to amplify the truth about what’s going on, instead of making excuses for it, or worse yet telling the viewers that the Left are right!
One would have to conclude that Hillary and her Army of Insane Liberals would have proposed that Conservatives aka The Deplorables be in camps, don’t ya think?
IF the committee can put someone “under oath”, and charge them with PERJURY if they “lie”, then, it’s a defacto “Court of Law”.
Stew on that, Chuckles.
I was in a men’s room with Chuck Schumer 25 years ago.
He assumed a “wide stance” and I have been traumatized ever since.
Go ahead Chuckie, prove it didn’t happen and you’re innocent.
Schumer is a festering pustule on the arse of the senate. Such people should not have a say in our nation’s future.
Harvard Law of course. But Schmuckie never lets his education get in the way of his partisanship.
There are rumors that Schumer has had sex with many whores, including Playboy models, and that there is video evidence. Schumer could be subject to blackmail, and the Deep State controls his every move.
Well, Chuck, one can truthfully say that there is no presumption of intelligence that exits your mouth.
The left loves to limit our rights to the smallest scope possible. Presumption of innocence is universal.
Just use his own words against him at his trial.
Good. Then we can no longer assume that Schumer is SANE, pro-America, a supporter of the Constitution, and not a crook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.