Posted on 09/06/2018 9:00:27 AM PDT by scouter
There are five considerations that seem to me to make it very likely that Archbishop Viganò's testimony is truthful. To be sure, given how numerous and detailed are the claims he makes, it would not be surprising if he has gotten certain particulars wrong. And perhaps in his passion he has inadvertently overstated things here and there. But the main claims are probably true. I certainly do not believe he is lying. The reasons are these:
(Excerpt) Read more at edwardfeser.blogspot.com ...
You may question his motives, but please know that they need not be singular.
For instance, aside from truly wanting to resolve the homosexual scandal, AB Vigano would be well within reason and justice to address his frustration at being unsuccessful in resolving the financial scandal he uncovered years ago.
There is nothing unjust in multiple motivations.
Agreed 100%. In fact, having multiple motivations provides more justification.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.