Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier
Perhaps another time, Baggy. I’m just not up for a schoolyard fight tonight.

This article should take the wind (get it?) out of any honest intellectual regarding anti-Q sentiment. You are, at the very least, intelligent.

See ya' another day on another thread, Windy.

:)

Bagster


65 posted on 07/08/2018 9:26:59 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: bagster
This article should take the wind (get it?) out of any honest intellectual regarding anti-Q sentiment.

I read the article (and the thread). In my opinion, the author states a lot of 'facts' that are not in evidence, including his theories about (what he calls) the Q project.

I have no objection to anything he said, because it's essentially his opinion.

I'd love to be dead wrong about Q, Sessions, and 'The Plan', but for now, it's all very unconvincing to me. I need to see some serious results before I even begin to buy in on any of this.

71 posted on 07/08/2018 9:48:14 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson