This article should take the wind (get it?) out of any honest intellectual regarding anti-Q sentiment. You are, at the very least, intelligent.
See ya' another day on another thread, Windy.
:)
Bagster
I read the article (and the thread). In my opinion, the author states a lot of 'facts' that are not in evidence, including his theories about (what he calls) the Q project.
I have no objection to anything he said, because it's essentially his opinion.
I'd love to be dead wrong about Q, Sessions, and 'The Plan', but for now, it's all very unconvincing to me. I need to see some serious results before I even begin to buy in on any of this.