I read the article (and the thread). In my opinion, the author states a lot of 'facts' that are not in evidence, including his theories about (what he calls) the Q project.
I have no objection to anything he said, because it's essentially his opinion.
I'd love to be dead wrong about Q, Sessions, and 'The Plan', but for now, it's all very unconvincing to me. I need to see some serious results before I even begin to buy in on any of this.
Fair enough. But in the meantime, wouldn't it be helpful if people on our own side didn't work AGAINST it? What if I (and this guy, and many others) are right, and Q is actually an operation put together and sanctioned by the President himself. :)
I think it would be helpful.
Bagster