She really does not understand how STUPID this is...
Precedent -— just another liberal excuse to ignore the written law of the land.
In the next term of the Supreme Court, with Trump’s new Justice, both Roe and Obergefell will be overturned!!
This was a ‘repeal to a new position’ tactic by the dems using the courts.
How does it work?
You want to get a change in the laws, that you KNOW the voters would never vote for...
So you propose a law that is the OPPOSITE of what you want, then you go to court and have the judge declare it ‘unconstitutional’ and so the OPPOSITE (what you really wanted) must become in effect.
Never mind that repealing something used to mean going back to whatever it was before...
They did this with Gays in the Military too. Gays were told ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ (which was the existing policy if you think about it) and then they went to court and declared “don’t ask, don’t tell” unconstitutional so “Ask and Tell” must be the new law.
These folks didn’t complain when the established precedent of Bowers v. Hardwick and the laws of 23 states were overturned.
And what does Susan Collins think happens to the precious soul when its physical body is torn to pieces?
I believe abortion is this nation’s great national sin on the same scale that caused Solomon and Israel to fall into disfavor with God. I can imagine God looking upon us as when Jesus turned and looked straight at Peter after his third denial. I have a genuine sense of sorrow and shame over our nation’s acceptance of abortion, which is both humbling and frightening to me. We have abused our faith and enormous God-given blessings. May God have mercy on us.
At one time, slavery was “precedent”.
Just saying ....
dred scott was all about precedent.
Baby killer.
How can liberals refer to Rowe v Wade as “the law of the land”? It wasn’t a law passed by congress and signed by a president, was it? If anything, its a precedent. An interpretation made up of whole cloth, so to speak. As such, until it’s codified, a future court can overturn it. The Civil Rights Act codified all men are created equal. Democraps have had ample opportunities to codify the right to choose, but, like amnesty, open borders, and climate change, when they had their majorities, they conveniently didn’t. In Obama’s case, he was too busy partying, golfing, and vacationing. The Democrats are about to find out Rowe v Wade is not the law of the land, and murder, inc is out of business.
Roe vs. Wade stretches any reasonable person's credulity to be asked to believe in this convolution which passes for reasoning. It gives rationalizing a bad name.
If a law student and submitted this argument on a paper, his professor would not give a passing grade.
Demonicrats are ALL about reversing precedent. What the heck are they talking about?