How can liberals refer to Rowe v Wade as “the law of the land”? It wasn’t a law passed by congress and signed by a president, was it? If anything, its a precedent. An interpretation made up of whole cloth, so to speak. As such, until it’s codified, a future court can overturn it. The Civil Rights Act codified all men are created equal. Democraps have had ample opportunities to codify the right to choose, but, like amnesty, open borders, and climate change, when they had their majorities, they conveniently didn’t. In Obama’s case, he was too busy partying, golfing, and vacationing. The Democrats are about to find out Rowe v Wade is not the law of the land, and murder, inc is out of business.
Those who make law via the courts, can have it taken away via the courts. I certainly hope you’re right about Roe v. Wade.