You're implying that the government can slowly confiscate hundreds of millions of firearms without raising suspicion, or provoking a response from the people?
No offense, but that's illogical at best, and some kind of paranoid delusion at worst.
You’re implying that the government can slowly confiscate hundreds of millions of firearms without raising suspicion, or provoking a response from the people?
No offense, but that’s illogical at best, and some kind of paranoid delusion at worst.
~~~~~~~~
They can do anything they want with the power of the press on their side and cooperation from social media.
Yes, it’s going to come off as some kind of paranoid delusion when you read it, but they can go around and target the most radical people first. Their will be incidents of course, but most people wont hear about them, and if they do, they will get the press to present the incidents as fanatical right wingers going off the deep end.
If you don’t think that can happen, ask yourself if you would have believed it if you were told 3 years ago that the democrats could install a special council that would hound a president for years with an investigation based off fake news russia influence after you knew everything about everything that hillary had already gotten away with without so much as a finger lifted to investigate.
Stoneman Douglas has already demonstrated that the population is willing to accept a narrative about events that absolve those negligent and actually point blame at fault against groups of people who’ve had nothing to do with it and with a broad brush create guilt by contrived association.
The Events at the Bundy Ranch
Seem to have been forgotten.
No More Wacos!