Posted on 04/20/2018 6:13:02 PM PDT by jfd1776
For over a century, Chicagoans grew up with a signature memory: special days downtown, shopping at Marshall Fields and Carsons, the great rival retail giants down the block from each other on State Street. (shown here: Carson's longtime downtown landmark by Louis Sullivan, sold off years ago).
Smaller stores came and went, but Fields and Carsons were the giants, the dominant figures in Midwestern retail for generations.
Macys bought out the struggling Fields chain over a decade ago and cremated the brand name while keeping the stores. Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. wasnt so lucky; its current holding company, Bon-Ton, is giving up the ghost for good this spring.
Unable to find a buyer or investor to keep the chain alive, Bon-Ton is shuttering its 200 stores and terminating its many brands. Along with Carsons, were likely saying goodbye to Bergners, Boston Store, Younkers, Elder-Beerman, and Herbergers (though theres still a chance that the liquidation might leave one or two of these names standing, God willing).
Many Americans grew up with these same memories Milwaukee kids shopped at Younkers or Boston Store; Rice Lake and Eau Claire kids headed to Herbergers there was a time when the department store the anchor of the local mall was the big draw. You bought your parents anniversary presents there, and your siblings Christmas presents, and your girlfriends birthday present too. Ever since the days of Montgomery Ward and Marshall Field, a century and a half ago, the department store has towered above the rest of the retail world in our communal memory.
And today, it is all but gone.
RETAIL: THE EASY ANSWER
Read the business pages, searching for the reason for the long slow death of traditional retail, and they will have answers that are difficult to challenge:
Its the full-on assault by Amazon and other online retailers; why pay more for the same thing at an expensive building, when you can get it by mail-order without leaving your house? Seems a logical enough position, until we recall that catalog sales provided just as easy an option for 150 years without killing the brick-and-mortar alternatives. So it cant really be that.
Or Its the lack of a genuine brand nowadays. When Fields, Carsons, and the rest stopped really making their own products, and just started slapping their private label on products made in the same Chinese factory as everybody elses, that took a toll. Why spend $40 for this Chinese shirt when I can buy a Chinese shirt at Walmart or Meijer for $20? That argument may be stronger.
Or Its the bad individual decisions made by some of these retailers. Penneys famously switched out their entire menswear lines in favor of all-extra-slim sizes a few years ago; the error lasted less than a year, but the damage was done. Similarly, some retailers target the wrong demographic, or hire the wrong decorator, or hitch their wagons to the wrong fad, and lose a season or two that they otherwise wouldnt have lost. But are such errors enough to kill a century-old name?
Industry experts have plenty of reasons for these failures. They see a bankruptcy, identify the companys last three mistakes, or the companys biggest competitors, and lay the blame there. Its how analysts think they have to in order to figure out which stocks to recommend and which stocks to flee.
But if every retailer is struggling, even in an economic recovery, mightnt there be some other reason for these doldrums? Some over-arching problem with our economy that we need to tackle before it gets too late? With the way that the analysts talk, one would think that the weak stores problems are their own fault, but strong stores will survive. And yet, only the low-priced stores are really thriving the Walmarts, the Meijers. Is that really because theyre so well-run, or might it perchance just be because they are low-priced?
Other industries dont have this problem. Theres room for both well-run fast food chains and poorly-run fast food chains, well-run homebuilders and poorly-run homebuilders, well-run landscape companies and poorly-run landscape companies, well-run radio stations and poorly-run radio stations. The economy is big enough to support all of these. You do better if you invest in the well-run ones, of course, but there are still jobs and profits to be made in the imperfect ones.
Why is it that only in retail have we begun to unquestioningly accept the premise that any business thats less than perfect is now expected to go bankrupt?
The retail sector especially every big department store that anchors a mall has an outsize role in the economic climate of our cities and towns. Retail draws tourists and suburbanites to our downtowns and to our malls. Retail provides the part-time jobs that high school and college students depend upon. Retail provides tax revenue for the community. And big retail makes small retail possible because without the anchors, people dont walk into the mall to get attracted to the smaller stores either.
RETAIL: THE REAL ANSWER
Retails plight has followed a demographic and economic change in America.
The retail world built up in the 20th century to respond to population growth, the same way it did in the 19th. As cities grew up, department stores came to the downtowns. As suburbs grew, the stores built branches in the suburbs too. Even small towns became hubs for the surrounding rural areas, and gained their own department stores as well. As American population grew, the feeling went, it would need and be able to support more stores.
But thats not how it turned out. The growth of the internet since the early 1990s has served as a handy scapegoat for our real problem, but the enemy is demographic, not digital. The long, slow death of department stores is caused by a transformation in who makes up the American population.
When America was on its great period of growth in the 1800s Americans prided themselves in being able to shop, to be able to own more than the single Sunday suit of clothes, the single wedding ring, the single pot or pan to which poor people had been limited since time immemorial. All of a sudden, a middle class was growing, a class of people who could enjoy plenty. Even those who were far from rich could afford to "go shopping," for the first time in history.
Henry Ford famously focused on producing a mass-produced vehicle that was affordable enough for his own employees to buy. Instead of the makers of luxury goods doing their manufacturing for members of an upper class, the American economy of a century ago enabled workmen to do their manufacturing for themselves. This was earth-shattering in economic history; it was a wonderful snapshot of the American promise that Washington, Hamilton and Morris had envisioned for us at our nations dawn.
But then came three big changes as the twentieth century progressed.
- The American government turned on its manufacturing sector. With high taxes, crippling employment regulations, union supremacy, corrupt government and a litigation culture, our manufacturers were driven away. The great American clothing and footwear and sporting goods and home appliance industries, one by one, were pushed overseas to foreign shores. Today, you cant buy an American iron, radio, or TV. You cant afford an American pair of shoes. You cant even find an American shirt or sport coat. The jobs arent there, so the people who would have worked those jobs cant afford to shop in the stores that would have sold them.
- The American public stopped marrying and having children. The average age of first marriages has skyrocketed; the average number of kids per family has plummeted. So the people who grew up in that department store culture we remember havent passed on that culture to many, or even any. (This writers grandmother worked at Fields in her 60s; both the writer and his father worked at Fields while in college. It was a part of our lives then; it is no longer). If you didnt grow up with both a special respect for the shelves of the department store, and an ability to afford what they sold, you wont shop there if you can buy the same thing for less somewhere else.
- Seeing the plummeting birthrates, the powers that be decided half a century ago to import their replacements. As we allowed late marriage, nihilism, selfishness and abortion to reduce our natural American population, we opened up our borders to a flood of immigrants, both legal and illegal as if numbers were numbers, and everyone was identical. But where has this left us? Our nation has nearly doubled its population since the last year of the Baby Boom, but with so much of that growth coming from poor foreign immigrants, this new demographic mix obviously cannot and will not support the same economy that the old demographic mix could (nothing against immigrants, by the way; this writer is a grandchild of immigrants but we are talking about undeniable statistics here, and cultural differences, in the big picture).
Just imagine. What if America had been allowed to continue, over the past century, the same way it grew in its first century? With limited government and minimal obstructions to manufacturing, our economy would have been able to continue to produce both domestic goods to fill the store shelves and an affluent enough populace to buy them. With an America that grew its population organically, with a gentle, controlled assist from abroad, rather than an America that stopped having children and had to import tens of millions wholesale, we would have a people who were raised from birth to participate in this domestic consumer economy.
The challenges of retail are real and this writer is not trying to overlay a political spin where none belongs. But as one peels this onion and studies these challenges, the real answer is undeniable. The causes of retails problems like the causes of most of our societal problems, from crime to wage stagnation to the unaffordable welfare state burden to urban flight lie in the errant liberal policies that have been practiced at the local, state, and federal level for a century now, and were then turbo-charged in the 1960s.
We have much to correct if we are to save this country. It can be done, but the first step is to acknowledge reality. Its the departure from the Founding vision of limited government that put us in this mess, and only a return to the Founders vision can help to bring us back.
Copyright 2018 John F. Di Leo
John F. Di Leo is a Chicagoland-based trade compliance trainer, writer and actor. A former board member of the Illinois Small Business Mens Association, the Illinois Right To Work Committee, and other such groups in the 1980s, he served as Milwaukee County Republican Chairman in the 1990s, and his columns are found regularly in Illinois Review.
Permission is hereby granted to forward freely, provided it is uncut and the IR URL and byline are included.
Last Christmas, I got to check a role off my bucket list (as an actor)...
I had the opportunity to play Kris Kringle in a local production of Miracle on 34th Street. A classic role originated by Edmund Gwenn, all about the rivalry between Macy’s and Gimbel’s, and the wonderful intersection of the spirit of Christmas with the commercial aspects of Christmas in America. A wonderful play, and a delight to be a part of.
I fear that the time may not be be too far off when that show - Miracle on 34th Street - is simply incomprehensible to the next generation. It’s about such a wonderful, almost bygone time.
That’s why I shed tears when these department stores close. It’s not just about the economy... it’s about Americana.
“...and know exactly when that all began to change.”
Forgive me. It has been changing from the beginning.
“Looseness” in dress, in attitude, in culture, is a frog in heating pot phenomena.
I’ve read accounts of despair against the leaflets that were nailed to telephone poles. That advertised the latest crimes, the latest ‘horrors’, the latest titillating shows to attend (picture how news was spread at the turn of the {last} century). (Advertising works, or they wouldn’t do it).
We have been going down this degraded, rumbled road for a long long time my FRiend.
To know “exactly”....would be when Eve took that bite.
If it felt like we were going to a better future it would not be a problem. But it doesn’t.
I was out walking a public trail running along a river. This was my second trip of the day and I was just trying to put in some extra effort into exercising and increasing my distance walked by a couple of miles more.
As I was crossing a narrow foot traffic bridge at the end of it I saw a woman with a camera which I had been seeing there throughout the day. She had been taking pictures of young couples dressed up formerly and using the area as a back drop for the pictures.
Still unaware of what was really happening I crossed the bridge to access the trail and my oldest daughter was standing at the end of it. We talked a second then I looked and my granddaughter. She was with her date for the Prom & were standing there dressed formerly and finally it clicked in my brain what was happening.
I said I'll get on out of the way and was fixing to start my walk when my daughter and granddaughter said wait a minute we want your picture taken with her {meaning my granddaughter}. So there was this beautiful young woman and I say that proudly as her grandfather standing beside an old man wearing coveralls, boots, with a camo cane and a head wrap so I didn't get my scalp sunburned.
Yeah it seemed awkward to me at first but I stood for the picture. I noticed my daughter was in her going walking clothes so I was a bit more at ease then. LOL
I bought some thumb drives there a few weeks back and they were in a plastic security case. I went through self service scan and pay and paid for them. I waited a few seconds figuring one of the half a dozen workers standing there telling people to use the self service line would come and open the case and hand me the thumb drives. They didn't and I went out of the store with my receipt in hand. I got in my truck and tried to open the stupid case and then took it back in. I told the worker this self service nonsense kinda defeats the whole purpose of store security now doesn't it. LOL
For others who might read this this thread, true "consumerism", for EVERYONE, and about departments stores in particular, began in the 1800s, in Manhattan and somewhere about the same time in Europe and the UK. But special events, department store restaurants, and actual consumerism is a thing of the Victorian ( mid 1800s ) era.
And at that time, strict moral behavior, rather chaste dress, and public morality was not only common, but the ONLY acceptable "culture"!
I have no idea what you've supposedly read, nut what you posted is utter and complete claptrap!
Advertising was done in newspapers, ladies' magazines, and yes, even store sent out catalogues! Lord & Taylor even sold their own compiled cookbook.
Postings on lamp posts? You don't know what you're talking about!
Do yourself a favor and don't post about topics you know less than NOTHING at all about and if you want to drag religion into it...go haunt FR's religion section!
What a charming story about your daughter and your beautiful granddaughter, who is VERY fortunate to have YOU as her grandpa! :-)
How exciting...dressed to the nines, for a prom! Then, having YOU there, to see how lovely she looked and a picture, of you all, to immortalized it all.
You were dressed properly for what YOU were doing and your daughter and granddaughter were equally dressed well, for what they were up to, as well. See? What I wrote, originally, still holds.
I hope that you get a copy of that photo, so that you'll always have a hard copy to go along with a wonderful, well cherished memory!
That's for sure. Some years back I took a beer-money job as a night stocker and saw that in spades. Even the temperature of the store was controlled from back East, who set the temp according to Bentonville climate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.