Posted on 03/06/2018 3:58:02 PM PST by SJackson
The practice of lawmakers bunking in their offices is unsanitary — and an abuse of taxpayer funds, according to members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
A bloc of House Democrats is calling for an ethics investigation into the widespread practice of lawmakers sleeping in their offices, arguing it's an abuse of taxpayer funds.
More than two dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus signed on to a letter obtained by POLITICO to Ethics Committee Chairwoman Susan Brooks (R-Ind.) and ranking member Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) asking for a probe into the “legality and propriety” of such conduct by members of Congress.
“There’s something unsanitary about bringing people to your office who are talking about public policy where you spent the night, and that’s unhealthy, unsanitary — and some people would say it’s almost nasty,” said Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the top Democrat on the Homeland Security Committee.
The CBC's push targets a practice popular among conservatives triggered by former Rep. Dick Armey, an architect of the 1994 “Republican Revolution.” Lawmakers often sleep in their offices to showcase their thriftiness and their aversion to the Washington swamp.
But it may violate House rules or federal law, according to Democratic critics.
“Members who sleep overnight in their offices receive free lodging, free cable, free security, free cleaning services, and utilize other utilities free of charge in direct violation of the ethics rules which prohibit official resources from being used for personal purposes,” the letter to the Ethics Committee states.
Among the 30 CBC signatories to the previously unreported Dec. 13 letter are CBC Chairman Cedric Richmond (D-La.), Assistant Democratic Leader Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) and Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
They asked for a response from the Ethics Committee by Jan. 5. Two months have since elapsed, and members say they’ve heard nothing back. Members are considering issuing a follow-up letter, which would be the third in a saga one member says began almost two years ago. And if Democrats retake the House in November, they’re almost certain to raise the issue again.
A spokesperson for the House Ethics Committee declined to comment.
The practice reaches the highest levels of Congress. Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) are among the dozens of members who sleep in their offices overnight. Estimates of how many do it range from 40-plus to more than 100. And while the list skews heavily Republican and male, some women and Democrats do it, too.
The Democratic critics argue that the behavior is unethical and beneath the dignity of the office. They also say it is unfair to the hundreds of members who choose to live outside the Capitol paying Washington’s high living costs.
“The House office buildings are ‘OFFICE’ buildings,” the letter continues. “[E]ach Member’s office within the building should be used to serve the people of the Member’s district, not as a personal residence. The House office buildings are not apartment complexes, homes or any other kind of residence.”
The Democrats also say lawmakers sleeping in their offices could create a hostile work environment, particularly if staffers are tasked with cleaning up members’ sleeping arrangements or interacting with lawmakers in inappropriate sleeping attire. However, even in the #MeToo era, there’s been no indication that sleeping in the office has led to any untoward behavior or harassment.
Lawmakers who sleep in the Capitol reject these charges; they say it’s a way for them to work harder for their constituents.
“I get up very early in the morning. I work out. I work until about 11:30 at night. I go to bed. And I do the same thing the next day,” Ryan said in 2015 when asked whether he would continue sleeping in his office after becoming speaker. “It actually makes me more efficient. I can actually get more work done by sleeping on a cot in my office.”
The letter recommends that if the committee determines the practice is permitted, that members who live in House office buildings be taxed at the “fair market value of a Capitol Hill apartment.”
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) pointed out in an interview that lawmakers pay taxes on reserved parking spaces on the Capitol campus but can live in their offices for free.
“If it is OK, then aren’t there tax implications?” she said. “If you park your car in a reserved spot, you pay taxes on that. You park your body in a reserved spot overnight on a daily basis and there’s no tax implication. That doesn’t seem to make too much sense.”
Some CBC members also suggested that if the committee gives a formal green light to the practice, the House should provide lawmakers a per diem to help with living expenses, as many state legislatures do across the country, or a cost-of-living salary increase. Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Nancy Pelosi are pictured. | Getty Images
“We think what’s good for the goose is good for the gander,” Watson Coleman said. “If you’re giving members an opportunity to live here rent-free using all the facilities, then perhaps those who are forced to live outside of the campus should have some consideration as well.”
One CBC member who declined to be named also criticized Republicans for advocating cuts to safety net programs while living rent-free in a government building.
“I think public housing should be for people who need it, not for members of Congress,” the member said, adding that some of the lawmakers who sleep in the Capitol are multimillionaires.
Regardless, the CBC members are growing impatient with the Ethics Committee’s pace in addressing their inquiry.
“I think that two months is more than enough time for the committee to do its work,” Thompson said. “Normally, when members inquire of the committee, there’s always a prompt response.”
No, no, no. One single large bunk bed living area with one community shower area and unisex bathrooms. These ba$turd$ think we should live with weirdos, they should too!!
I don’t get this why does this get these fools agitated? There is definitely something about this we don’t know.
I don’t get this why does this get these fools agitated? There is definitely something about this we don’t know.
Why is any “solution” needed? Some members of Congress have decided to maintain their full-time residences (and families) in their home districts, and neither need nor can afford an expensive part-time residence in DC. I might care what an employee spends, but it is none of my business what he chooses not to spend. Kudos to them for keeping their families at home!
No more air conditioning or computers in Congressional office buildings or in the Capitol.
They should let the homeless sleep in their offices.
I’ll bet President Trump can figure out a way to make some of the empty office buildings into apartments. We could cut their salary and require them to live in one of the congressional apartments
I can imagine the cost of living in DC and how much sleep do they get if they do manage to have a place anyway, who needs a king size when ya get get by on an air mattress?
A nice blankie and a comfy couch could work nicely , they have attached bathrooms so it’s not that spartan, is it?
Maybe we should get the opinion of the Congressional White Caucus. Oh, wait, there isn’t such a group. That would be racist.
Paul Ryan and the others should not be living in their offices.
Why not?
My bad. I'm old school. 😉
I think it does, and without their family here, they are paying expenses for two houses. I believe they go to their home states on most weekends or holidays.
The Dems are just looking for things to make big issues of, and this is long standing practice done by more Republicans than Democrats.
Yes, I am sure Nancy must be seen and heard, lol.
Sleeping with who? #MeToo
...oh wait. Sleeping sleeping. This must be why Thad Cochrane is resigning.
“How about a Congressional barracks or no frills apartment building for the little sweethearts?”
Actually I believe you are close to the answer. My bet upon reading this is the underlying goal to be either the construction of Congressional housing, or compensation above, and beyond their salary for housing.
I couldn’t find any compensation for housing outside their salary when I researched the issue. Only for office supplies, and the like.
“It’s not fair that they work harder than me, but I have to get paid more if I work harder, so give me per diem so that I can get paid to do what they’re doing for free... for fairness... or something...”
Because of some of the reasons cited, such as using office resources for free for personal living situations.
If they insist on living in the office, they should pay rent, in my opinion.
Also, these guys get paid a comfortable six figure income. If that’s not sufficient to find a place to live, even though Washington is expensive, then I don’t know what else to say.
If I recall correctly, the U.S. Capitol is filled with nooks and crannies and this is where representatives sleep. The spaces, think former porter's closets, are divvied up by some impartial party like the Architect of the Capitol. In short, it's not luxury; it's expedient.
Because of some of the reasons cited, such as using office resources for free for personal living situations.
If they insist on living in the office, they should pay rent, in my opinion.
Also, these guys get paid a comfortable six figure income. If that’s not sufficient to find a place to live, even though Washington is expensive, then I don’t know what else to say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.