Flynn’s a spook. He lied purposefully about a non-crime because he needed to out Strzok. Strzok was the keystone that will cause the whole arc of this upper echelon of the FBI to some crashing down.
If Flynn is a suspect and is being questioned by law enforcement, don't they have an obligation to apprise him of his rights before questioning him? Wouldn't that have alerted him to get his lawyers first?
-PJ
There is ample opportunity, however, for the investigators to generate perjury or obstruction of justice charges based on their prejudices regarding the responses, not the law.
The whole program worked on Nixon. It involves to things:
An incredibly hostile media constantly drumming the criminality and the mental and moral fitness of the president and
A prosecutor who has no assigned limits, no ethics and a team of accomplices hostile to the intended target.
The intent of the whole program is to wear the public down to the point where they just want the issue to go away usually to the detriment of the targeted individual.
Not sure that’s actually “entrapment” however.....
Who knew that the Obama Justice Department would still be running things a year after the election?
I guess it’s out there and I missed it, but just how long have these bozos...McCabe, Strzok, Rosenstein, worked in the FBI.
God knows how much more damage they may have caused. What about past cases of injustice, unless they were hired in 2009 when everything became an injustice.
It seems there is no shortage of military higher ups that have proven to be dumber than the average infantrymen after a few rounds of battle.
Sad to see how many of them then are called to act as advisers and confidantes to politicos seeking their knowledge and insight.
Military people are used to dealing with evil at the end of their rifle barrel. They are not used to dealing with evil within the “team”.
It has been discussed that Flynn can withdraw his plea based on the actions of Strzok. Does anyone remember the law or case that was cited?