Posted on 11/18/2017 10:13:48 PM PST by Kartographer
But a moment of reassessment is a good time to reassess things for yourself, so I spent this week reading about the lost world of the 1990s. I skimmed the Starr Report. I leafed through books by George Stephanopoulos and Joe Klein and Michael Isikoff. I dug into Troopergate and Whitewater and other first-term scandals. I reacquainted myself with Gennifer Flowers and Webb Hubbell, James Riady and Marc Rich.
After doing all this reading, Im not sure my reasonable middle ground is actually reasonable. It may be that the conservatives of the 1990s were simply right about Clinton, that once he failed to resign he really deserved to be impeached.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Unreal—these effing IDIOTS now wonder? Anyone with a brain knew what the dirt bag Clintons were/are all about.
For liberals-—morality is nonexistent—as long as their demonic filthy agenda is empowered.
Definitely an obvious attempt to kick the Clinton’s off the stage to push an even further leftist agenda....how stupid are these people?
Starr was playing nerf ball with them and later regretted having stepped up to be the investigator.
And Hellary stood by her man and went after the victims with everything she could.
depends on what “if” means.......
In short if Mrs. Moore acted like Hillary...
We know. New York Times snowflakes would be screaming from the rooftops if the shoe was on the other foot... and it would not be pretty.
The only reason New York Times editors pretend to give a damn about the powerless women Bill Clinton abused is because they've been told by their democrat 'sources' that they should care.
Why? Why now and not last year?
Because their phony 'concern' is a tactic - a tactic to set up a path to take down President Trump or other Republican caught in 'jaywalking' messes (relative to Bill Clinton..._ So, Keep hating them... they don't give a damn about justice, or fairness, or powerless traditional women. The New York Times is assisting with setting up a trap. A trap they think will work against Republicans. Keep hating the New York Times. They are scum.
LOL - good suggestion.
Something smells at the NYSlime.
My, my, all that navel gazing and he did not notice the curious death of Vince Foster?
Dead Pool who is first, him or her?
Will she receive a State Funeral with caisson?
“Will she receive a State Funeral with caisson?”
I certainly hope not.
[snip] It may be that the conservatives of the 1990s were simply right about Clinton, that once he failed to resign he really deserved to be impeached. [/snip]
Of course he did. He was unfit for office. Besides his rapes, he and Hitlery are grifters.
Thanks Kartographer. More from the Slimes’ resident fake conservative:
New York Times columnist tweets joke about killing Trump
The New York Post | February 25, 2016 | David K. Li
Posted on 02/25/2016 5:35:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3401987/posts
Ross Douthat Childishly Begs for Trump’s Removal via 25th Amendment
NewsBusters | May 18, 2017 | P.J. Gladnick
Posted on 05/19/2017 7:37:59 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3553289/posts
Ross Douthat Goes Off NYT Reservation with Faint Trump Praise
NewsBusters | April 27, 2017 | P.J. Gladnick
Posted on 04/27/2017 5:34:40 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3548064/posts
I see you buy into the John Kerry-France-Soviet version of events.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.