Thanks to Thinden for finding these interesting pics.
Posted on 11/02/2017 8:55:14 AM PDT by davikkm
As per Twitter’s general Counsel Sean Edgett written testimony to the US Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, the social media giant’s algorithms colluded (pun intended) with Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016 in a big way.
In layman’s terms, Twitter’s systems were tweaked to help Hillary win the election by burying almost half (48 percent) of the tweets that were made under the #DNCLeak hashtag and a quarter of tweets using the #PodestaEmails hashtag.
Basically, Twitter tried to censor/alter the news cycle on its platform by hiding large portions of tweets regarding the hacked-emails-scandal which concerned the Clinton Campaign, the Democratic National Committee and John Podesta himself (the guy who used ‘password’ for his email password), who was Clinton campaign chairman at the time.
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
Thanks to Thinden for finding these interesting pics.
Great post thank you.
As someone said yesterday... is this influencing the election? Could suppressing information damaging to a candidate be considered an in-kind campaign donation?
There is big Mercer news. The kind that comes when something is coming...no idea what it could be
bttt
You should see the “artwork” in his house
Hmm...seeing on twitter its about buzzfeed article..others say espionage investigation...whatever it is....its big news
I dont see how you can like that art...and not be creepy
How did Twitter determine who could see the hashtags, and who shouldn’t. My guess is they hid the Tweets from liberals, progressives, and other anti-American vermin.
As to the suspenders/braces, they look like Max Parish prints....from here....without zooming in (that would be wierd?)
Yeah, twitter.....pure as the driven snow! Higher called! Ethics driven!
KYPD
Is this where y’all stole the material from?
“You should see the “artwork” in his house!”
Including some out there statues!
You SHOULD see the artwork in that man’s house!!!
Don’t forget the “sculptures”
That crap gives me nightmares!!!
Creepy indeed.
I’m about 3 hours from a lunch meeting, and what you posted may have me drinking some wine and water for lunch.
There are other platforms emerging.
Get on there, get used to them, sell them to friends and family. We have plenty of time to male them as big by 2020.
Whether intentional or not, the sculpture bears a resemblance to one of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer’s victims. You can view the image here (warning - it is not gory, but still disturbing). The caption to the image reads: “Dahmer photographed his victims’ bodies in various positions that he found sexually significant.” I could find no indication that Bourgeois intentionally modelled the sculpture on the Dahmer photograph, and while the poses are not identical, the similarities are striking, including the arched position, the slender frame, the prominent ribs, and the lack of a head.
Laura Wainman wrote a piece on Tony’s home, published for Washington Life on June 5, 2015. In it, Tony lists Louise Bourgeois and Marina Abramovic (of “spirit cooking” fame, see first paragraph above) as among his top five favorite “artists”. But the first “artist” in Tony’s collection mentioned in the article is Serbian painter Biljana Djurdjevic. Here’s a selection of her work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.