1 posted on
08/15/2017 12:52:06 PM PDT by
EVO X
To: EVO X
Does the mafia buy identity theft protection for it’s numbers customers?
2 posted on
08/15/2017 12:53:31 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: EVO X
I don’t think it’s “required”, but it’s prudent.
3 posted on
08/15/2017 12:55:30 PM PDT by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: EVO X
Caught scheming against Bernie, giving out debate questions? Order Lie-Lock now to protect all your sensitive dem corruption. Use promo code “PODESTA”
4 posted on
08/15/2017 12:57:34 PM PDT by
scottinoc
To: EVO X
Nope! Democrats wanted to leave their internet wide open without any protection, so that they can use Russian hacking as an excuse for losing the election.
5 posted on
08/15/2017 1:09:39 PM PDT by
entropy12
(Why Republicans woo & pursue people who will never vote for them (liberals & media) ?)
To: EVO X
They weren’t hacked. It was an inside leak.
8 posted on
08/15/2017 1:18:02 PM PDT by
RC one
(The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
To: EVO X
They knew full well it was a leak not a hack, so they bought a contract on the leaker, Seth Rich.
11 posted on
08/15/2017 1:36:29 PM PDT by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: EVO X
That’s funny. Are you one of those people who think the world is fair?
To: EVO X
In the future, could you describe the contents of your vanities so we can decide whether it’s worth opening? Thanks!
17 posted on
08/15/2017 2:41:20 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson