Posted on 08/03/2017 6:13:17 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
For anyone who monitors a lot of news and political sources on social media, every day is filled with "The Onion or Not The Onion?" moments. Much of what the leftists-especially the social just warriors-do is often hard to distinguish from satire or parody.
Here's an example:
Affinity Magazine ✔@TheAffinityMag(snip)Do White Men Really Deserve To Vote? The Same People Who Bought Us Trump: http://affinitymagazine.us/2017/08/01/do-white-men-really-deserve-to-vote/ 11:55 AM - Aug 1, 2017
1,635 Replies 375 Retweets 332 likes
It turns out that the site was founded by a teenager and caters to teens. More on that in a moment, let's look at the meat of the post.
Now, history lessons aside; many people who disagree so far might be thinking, Yes, all this injustice that happened in the past was undoubtedly awful. However, two wrongs dont make a right. However one cant be sure if withdrawing the white mans vote could be considered a wrong. Furthermore, the point here that has to be made is that banning white men from voting temporarily will help them understand systemic injustice and help them become better, more empathetic allies to the social justice cause. ......
That's the conclusion offered by the sixteen-year-old author. Let's commit an injustice to make people understand injustice. This, of course, is not unheard of from leftists.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Their only concerns of being popular, zits, boy/girl friends .....
Idiots verbalizing award.
Well, we went to war over “Taxation without Representation is Tyranny”!
So would this be. WAR.
Or...
How about this? Us White men stop paying taxes?
White liberals have to be suicidal.
My Remington 870P votes “YES”.
I’d like a return to “you have to own real estate to vote”. Nothing fancy. Even a half acre in Appalachia will do.
These are the same pukes that get sexually aroused watching Maduro’s thugs kidnap and mass-murder Venezuelan patriots up against a wall.
“Thankfully” this teen only ‘suggested temporary suspension’ of giving white men voting rights.
Given to the ‘ultimate’ conclusion of these SJWs, they don’t want ‘white men’ participating in anything except for paying their social justice COSTS, taking continuous abuses, deserving no thanks for the labor, and continue doing whatever ‘white men’ have been doing to maintain their comfy society.
In other words, they want Sugar Daddy paying for their useless ‘school learning’, paving their ways into society for ALL the things they DESERVE in life, and don’t even try to ‘talk back’. Most likely, their real-life (long suffering) dads.
I will either be voting or shooting.The SJW types can decide or me which it will be.
Your proposal would create a progressive real estate scheme selling 1 square foot lots for $1000 each.
Well, if I don’t deserve to vote, I guess I don’t deserve to pay any taxes whatsoever.
As long as a Klan sight can ponder the same about blacks then we have free speech. Otherwise we have a targeted group.
Blacks shouldn’t vote since they gave us Obama!
One of the biggest mistakes we made was deciding to start teaching womenfolk and the pigment-challenged to read and write. It’s how we got 8 years of The Magic Negro, and it was nearly the end of us.
Add self hating White men, traitors, parasites, and haters of America to your statement and I will agree with you. While the ones you referred to did their part, they could not pull the wagon alone. They had more than enough help from the self hating White men to get it across the finish line.
;^)
Apparently my sense of humor doesn't impress our AMod.
LOL!
It turns out that the site was founded by a teenager and caters to teens.
Guess who want’s to be a shock jock $$$$ not to ensue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.