Posted on 07/31/2017 6:42:46 AM PDT by gaggs
THIS NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED BY THE DOJ! – While working for Obama, Susan Rice’s Net Worth More than doubled ($20 million to $50 million) On a yearly salary of $174 thousand.
A United Nations diplomat doesn’t seem to be a likely candidate for Lifestyles of the Super Rich. However, Susan Rice worked under the Obama Administration, so anything is possible.
(Excerpt) Read more at commonsenseevaluation.com ...
Looters.
Ayn Rand was right, on this point at least.
Follow the $$$$ and it will lead to the swamp.
Agree completely.
Disgusting.
They ALL get rich in Washington......even that old socialist carpenter Bernie Sanders has managed to make a few million.....
LOLOL in a curious kind of way. And the original number came from where? Her hubby? Her endeavors? Cattle futures?
Wow...lying for a living pays, I guess...we’ll see what the future has for her...
Uh, black female privilege? Or she cashed in a lot of “pop” bottles as a kid.
Criminal...liar...traitor. Why isn’t this rich loser scum in prison or at the end of a rope? Where is Justice for this chancre on society?
Taxpayers demand to know the scope and dimension of government insider Susan Rice's ability to collude in sub rosa deals and who might be personally profiting.
<><> L/E needs to examine (a) National Security agency budgets connected to Susan Rice, (b) UN budgets, and, (c) their respective bank accounts.
<><> Joint bank accounts might be used to facilitate the transfer of US govt funds from one account to another, and/or wire-transferred offshore;
<><> To cover her tracks, fake govt invoices might be created to show that govt money deposited into accounts was being used for legitimate govt purposes.
<><> Financial schemes scheme might be advanced by issuing phony statements of payments from financial sources that actually covered the transfer of govt funds for insiders' personal use and/or for offshore schemes.
===============================================
NOTE WELL Under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks are required to establish, implement and maintain programs designed to detect and report suspicious activity indicative of money laundering and other financial crimes. “The Bank Secrecy Act was enacted to protect the public from harm by identifying and detecting money laundering from criminal enterprises, terrorism, tax evasion or other unlawful activities,” the special agent in charge for Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation, explained.
Shady banking transactions could be prosecuted under the (1) Bank Secrecy ACT, (2) RICO, and, (3) the Hobbs Act.
=============================================
<><> L/E should get ahold of: (1) copies of Susan Rice's checks, (2) wire transfers, (3) account statements, (4) invoices, (5) bills, (6) delivery tickets, (7) correspondence including snail mail, e-mail, mobile devices, cell phones, (8) contracts, (9) loan agreements, (10) voucher reimbursements, and, (11) Rice's other account books or official records.
L/E should also explore (a) monies Rice paid to brokers, sub- brokers, (b) family members, (c) mortgage brokers, (d) financial managers, and, (e) real estate agents, brokers, and developers.
<><> L/E should scrutinize bank accounts for suspicious activites: (A) large deposits, (B) funds transferred from one account into another, (C) frequent requests for withdrawals.
<><> Bank records might also show diversions to secret LLC accounts, to money launder and to operate personal ventures---or to finance political activities (and/or other redistribution schemes favored by the WH).
Tax fraud may also be a factor; facilitated by withdrawals, gift cards purchases, credit card purchases and intra-bank transfers from DHS accounts into personal accounts, campaign accounts, or into redistribution schemes.
<><> A huge tipoff is whether bank withdrawals support and luxurious lifestyle including payments for real estate, investment and stock holdings, jewelry, luxury vehicles, resort travel....... and gifts from luxury outlets for wives and mistresses (and campaign activities, or other redistribution schemes).
=================================================
Taxpayers demand the Bank Secrecy Act be used to prosecute govt fraud, and nonprofit fraud, pronto.
ACTION NOW-—CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FBI TIPS PAGE--YOU MAY REMAIN ANONYMOUS ---https://tips.fbi.gov
Can anybody post her last financial disclosure form?
She was working for the American People not Barry.
Congress is allowed to inside trade...have to admit if i was an insider congress person and the law allowed me to do it..I would do it. They need to change that.
What does her husband do for a living?
Just looked up Ian Officer Cameron. He was executive producer for ABC News - This Week. His Canadian family owns (owned?) a big lumber yard. Still, how did their income increase by 30 million??? Maybe they sold the lumber yard?
I am not sticking up for the Rice person but I would bet that 90% of the persons in the fed gubmint have at least doubled their worth by the time they leave our employment.
Rice probably made money 3 ways with our government spying on foriegn countries.
1. Prior knowledge, aka intel, re what stocks to buy or sell based on the intel.
2. She sold her prior knowledge, aka intel, to the highest bidders here and around the world.
3. To buy futures or to sell short, the currencies of the nation’s spied on re commerce.
The US Government’s Secret Plans to spy for American Corporations
Glenn Greenwald September 5 2014, 6:47 a.m.
Throughout the last year, the U.S. government has repeatedly insisted that it does not engage in economic and industrial espionage, in an effort to distinguish its own spying from China’s infiltrations of Google, Nortel, and other corporate targets. So critical is this denial to the U.S. government that last August, an NSA spokesperson emailed The Washington Post to say(emphasis in original): “The department does ***not*** engage in economic espionage in any domain, including cyber.”
After that categorical statement to the Post, the NSA was caught spying on plainly financial targets such as the Brazilian oil giant Petrobras; economic summits; international credit card and banking systems; the EU antitrust commissioner investigating Google, Microsoft, and Intel; and the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
In response, the U.S. modified its denial to acknowledge that it does engage in economic spying, but unlike China, the spying is never done to benefit American corporations.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, for instance, responded to the Petrobras revelations by claiming: “It is not a secret that the Intelligence Community collects information about economic and financial matters….
What we do not do, as we have said many times, is use our foreign intelligence capabilities to steal the trade secrets of foreign companies on behalf of—or give intelligence we collect to—U.S. companies to enhance their international competitiveness or increase their bottom line.”
Rice was not a protected Congre$$it re insider trader.
However your point re that Congre$$its can make insider trades is very valid:
https://theintercept.com/2015/05/07/congress-argues-cant-investigated-insider-trading/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.