I don’t click the twitter heart too often on anyone except this guy and James Woods.
not exactly the ideal spot to be
Someone remind me again, speaking of math, and Truth, and Nate Silver...
What percentage chance did Silver give for Trump being elected?
Who actually won again?
We need to instill this attitude in the Dems:
"Well, they're all moral victories." (preen).
Better yet, drive them to despair, and hopefully thence to repentance. They are utterly evil.
‘@mitchellvii is a beacon in a growing storm of bad news — a kind of post-truth, post-math Nate Silver.’
What is ‘post-math,’ supposed to mean? Mitchell is post math the way Hillary is post alcohol. He’s a numbers whiz. I followed him for mos leading up to the election, and his poll analysis was nonpareil. He took the methodology apart at the seams, and put the poll biases in glaring highlights. His predictions were uncannily accurate.
He was at his best on election night. I checked in at FR, and a chorus was claiming we’d lose FL. I switched over to Mitchell’s twitter feed, and he said (in essence) ‘FL is in the bag for Trump: here’s why.’
I’d have been a basket case on election eve without Mitchell. I’ve enjoyed his pithy comments in the meantime too. He’s right—he does have a way with words.
Do us, the non Twitters, a favor.
Post some of his best tweets and ping us.
Does he look more like a televangelist or the anti-Christ?
Buzzfeed = Fakefeed
Anybody know where CNN Jim Acosta has gone? Crickets, lately. Did he run out of gas?
they can call him what they want- Bill Mitchell’s predictions were head and shoulders above anything nate silver offered during last year’s election.
Brand new Mitchell tweet:
Bill Mitchell: Let me bottom line this for the Leftists out there. If Obama was great, Hillary would be President. He wasn’t, she’s not, next.