Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study says self-driving cars will create a $7 trillion 'passenger economy'
Mashable ^ | June 3, 2017 | Brett Williams

Posted on 06/06/2017 6:39:32 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: central_va

“This is all about making driving unaffordable for the masses and forcing them to move into socialist hives(cities).”

Not at all. Technology is getting to the place where self-driving cars will be cheaper, faster, and safer than human drivers.

It will likely result in people being more open to longer commutes. People are likely to conduct business while riding and even have meals.

This is a disruptive technology, so it will have its downsides. But cars are better than riding in a horse-drawn buggy. And self-driving cars will be a step up for the most part.

There will probably be a transition where cars can be driven by people or by computers. Over time people will gravitate to the benefits of self-driving. And eventually self-driving will become too risky and cost-prohibitive.

When I was a kid we had a rotary phone. Touch-tone service was introduced as an upgrade. Eventually touch-tone was free, then rotary was an extra charge, and then it went away. Now everyone has a cell phone. Is that better? In some respects, yes. In others, no.

Look at all of the technological change that happened in the last 200 years. More is happening today than ever before. Change is happening at a more rapid pace. Now we have to adapt more quickly.


41 posted on 06/06/2017 7:20:13 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You should be able to get quite a bit of use out of it before this all take place. Eventually driving cars will be considered to risky, and insurance will spike. Be prepared to sell at the top of the bell curve.


42 posted on 06/06/2017 7:22:27 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: setha

“Not likely to happen as long as there are destinations too far off the map.”

There are few places that a car could be driven that next generation navigation and communications will not reach. For those places there will probably be specialty vehicles or older ones still in use. It will probably be possible to 3D print replacement parts for old cars by then. And the patents will be expired also.


43 posted on 06/06/2017 7:27:29 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

Cars are already a maintenance nightmare with the technology they have today. Adding more on top of it makes them even more of a nightmare. The 5 year depreciation will be horrible. As long as we retain the option of driving it manually when the shit breaks then I am good. But the a-holes that run the world will probably get rid of that option.


44 posted on 06/06/2017 7:27:37 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

When they reference 2050 it makes me laugh. I’ll be 90 years old.


45 posted on 06/06/2017 7:29:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

naaaah..... people will pass the time in their commutes playing video games and watching stupid pet trick videos.


46 posted on 06/06/2017 7:29:48 PM PDT by Enchante (Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This article wrongly assumes everyone can adapt, and that’s not true. High unemployment among those least able to redefine themselves leads to drug addiction, crime, despair and depression. It is why the displacement of working class American men in the workforce by women and immigrants has led to declines in their life expectancy.
And driver is the most common job category in many states, filled disproportionately from the working class.

Dr. Jordan Peterson - IQ and The Job Market
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjs2gPa5sD0


47 posted on 06/06/2017 7:31:06 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They’ll do wonders for the vehicle bomb industry. No suicidal inbred required.


48 posted on 06/06/2017 7:31:22 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Two vehicles approaching each other on a curved highway on a hill, traveling 70 mph each in opposite directions, relying on an Internet of Things for their precision passing one another an missing each other by less than 2 ft. what could possibly go wrong? It’s not like our PCs ever fail nor the internet fail.....


49 posted on 06/06/2017 7:31:30 PM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I don’t think many people will own cars when this is fully implemented. Sure, at first cars will have the ability to drive themselves or be driven by humans.

Later, cars will be mostly a service. Dealerships will disappear.

Shorter commutes or simply budget-conscious travelers will probably use no-frills cars. But where will these trips go? The grocery store? Groceries will probably be delivered to your door.

For longer trips, you may walk out your door, anywhere, and immediately step into a luxury vehicle with amenities similar to an office, living room, or dining room. It will drive you anywhere. There will be a service industry that caters to riders.

And all of this will be far cheaper than what you pay now, as a percentage of your income, on total cost of ownership for your car. It will be safer, faster, more convenient, and cheaper than having a single car today, but it will be better than every family member having his or her own car and chauffeur.


50 posted on 06/06/2017 7:40:59 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“When they reference 2050 it makes me laugh. I’ll be 90 years old.”

I think Jesus will come back before then, but if He delays, who knows how advanced technology will become.

Ninety may become the new middle age with an average life span of 180.

Of course if this involves implanted computer technology, count me out. Not sure what the “mark of the beast” constitutes just yet, but I’m sure it is going to be something invasive and identity altering.


51 posted on 06/06/2017 7:45:02 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Bull. You have never lived in the country. It takes the police 10-15 minutes to get to my house.

Funny how salaries NEVER keep up with technology. Technology is making us poorer not richer. When I was growing up you had a phone bill, an electric bill and a mortgage. Now add DSL/data, satellite/cable TV, cell phone bill - it really adds up. Without paying for all of this crap I'd be retired already.

Now we want exotic robo cars. Good grief.

52 posted on 06/06/2017 7:50:44 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Tell Google to Find off!


53 posted on 06/06/2017 7:53:57 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am the Passenger

And I ride and I ride


54 posted on 06/06/2017 7:54:52 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Image result for self-driving car gif
55 posted on 06/06/2017 8:03:09 PM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Image result for self-driving car gif
56 posted on 06/06/2017 8:07:11 PM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

The technology has been here for years. RCA had a prototype of a self-driving car that they were testing in Princeton, NJ in 1960 (yes, that’s almost 60 years ago!). What has held up the proliferation of these self-driving cars is that the technology isn’t reliable and precise enough to do what everyone thinks it’s supposed to do (drive with no driver at all) ... but it MUST do what everyone thinks it’s supposed to do before it really has any value to anyone. A car that is 99% autonomous is really no better than a car that is 0% autonomous.


57 posted on 06/06/2017 8:21:22 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

so self-driving cars are going to make LA traffic disappear?

no...acesss to self-driving cars by those who don’t already own a car will add to traffic by putting more, not less, vehicles on the road


58 posted on 06/06/2017 8:22:41 PM PDT by blueplum ( ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Yes, it is essentially a train.
All the cars going the same speed.
Only difference is you would have a private compartment.

I’d rather take a train than be in a driverless car.


59 posted on 06/06/2017 8:23:14 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The first lawsuit stemming from two self-driving cars colliding will be interesting.


60 posted on 06/06/2017 8:24:14 PM PDT by libertylover (In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson