Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War against the Confederacy
US Defense Watch ^ | April 30, 2017 | Ray Starmann

Posted on 04/30/2017 9:49:31 PM PDT by pboyington

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: yoe
The Abe Lincoln in school history books is a myth.

If not for myths then what would people around here have to talk about when it came to the threads about the Southern rebellion? Take this thread, for example. "Lee himself never purchased or owned any slaves." Lee most certainly did, and Douglas Southall Freeman details as much in his biography of Lee. "In fact if you had asked him, he would have told you he was opposed to slavery." Mildly opposed, perhaps. But as late as 1865 he was saying that slavery was the best situation for blacks in the Confederate States. "Lincoln was a realist who would have done just about anything to save the Union, including tossing the constitution out the window, which he frequently did." That's just nonsense. "Two years after emancipation, Lincoln was concocting ways for the black population to be relocated to British Colonies in the Caribbean before he was assassinated." As is that. "What if Lincoln was more of a racist than Lee?" Depends on how you would define it. If you define it by today's standards than everyone back then - Lee, Lincoln, Jackson, whomever - is a stone racist. If you define it by the standards of the times then Lincoln looks pretty good compared with his peers.

41 posted on 05/01/2017 5:44:43 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Most people don’t have enough fingers or toes to count all the factual errors the author alleges in his rant.


42 posted on 05/01/2017 5:49:08 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Erasing history and changing names of landmarks for political reasons is a very Soviet practice.

Isn't it interesting that our contemporary commies are acting just like Stalin in this respect. Give them power, and they'll emulate ol' Uncle Joe in *every* respect: gulags and summary executions included.

43 posted on 05/01/2017 6:01:18 AM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pboyington; DoodleDawg; rockrr

Some of this is OK, right on even, but the majority is nonsense reflecting disrespect for real history as opposed to pro-Confederate propaganda.


44 posted on 05/01/2017 6:38:11 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

“That’s fine so long as they were not flying above the American flag.”

Of course. The “Stars & Bars” were flying alone in these cases.


45 posted on 05/01/2017 6:46:17 AM PDT by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
“I don't think it was Lincoln, his cabal or the Northern state militias who fired the first shots at Ft. Sumter.”

And what is your point....that the first to fire was to blame?

Then, the Union troops at Ft. Barrancas take that honor.... a full three months before Sumter....January 8, 1861.

But if you want to focus on Ft. Sumter, the first shot was fired there by the Union Ship Harriet Lane, by Union Lieutenant Tompkins.

He was a part of the Lincoln Cabal military.

46 posted on 05/01/2017 6:48:47 AM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Great post. Eisenhower was from Kansas as well.


47 posted on 05/01/2017 7:16:41 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PeaRidge

Union troops at Ft. Barrancas fired warning shots to deter thugs who were advancing upon the fort.

The Harriet Lane fired a warning shot against a ship closing on her at night while flying no colors.

The rebels fired upon Fort Sumter as an overt act of war against their own country.


48 posted on 05/01/2017 7:19:19 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Eisenhower was a professional soldier and he respected the abilities of a number of Civil War generals. Here's what he had to say on Grant:

"I think Ulysses S. Grant is vastly underrated as a man and as a general. I know people think this and that about his drinking habits, which I think have been exaggerated way out of line. The fact is, he never demanded more men or material from the war department, he took over an army that had a long history of retreating and losing. That army had no confidence in their fighting ability and Grant came in as a real outsider. He had so many disadvantages going into the 1864 campaign, now 100 years ago. But he met every test and rose to the occasion unlike I’ve ever seen in American history. He was a very tough yet very fair man and a great soldier. He’s not been given his due...Grant devised a strategy to end the war. He alone had the determination, foresight, and wisdom to do it. It was lucky that President Lincoln didn’t interfere or attempt to control Grant’s strategic line of thinking. Lincoln wisely left the war to Grant, at least in the concluding moves after he came east. Grant is very undervalued today, which is a shame, because he was one of the greatest American generals, if not the greatest."

Link

49 posted on 05/01/2017 7:29:11 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ohioman
Great post. Eisenhower was from Kansas as well.

Born in Texas actually, and grew up in Kansas. So both sides theoretically can lay claim to him.

50 posted on 05/01/2017 7:32:39 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: OIFVeteran
Maturity is a rare thing.
51 posted on 05/01/2017 7:42:45 AM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pboyington
Here's a racist flag:


52 posted on 05/01/2017 7:45:20 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berosus
What a difference from the 1950s. The Battle flag is NOT the stars and bars. Today's snowflakes would have to find a safe space if they saw this!


53 posted on 05/01/2017 7:49:39 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (That's my story and I'm sticking to it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Flags of the Confederate States of America (clockwise from left):

1) Stars and Bars (National Flag #1)
2) Stainless Banner (National Flag #2)
3) Bloodstained Banner (National Flag #3)
4) Bonnie Blue Flag (Long history, never an official CSA flag)
5) Battle Flag (Or would be, if it were square. Rectangular flag was a Naval Jack).

54 posted on 05/01/2017 7:59:27 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Berosus
Of course. The “Stars & Bars” were flying alone in these cases.

I know that Southerners are among the most patriotic of Americans.

55 posted on 05/01/2017 8:17:07 AM PDT by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pboyington
Joan Baez-The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down
56 posted on 05/01/2017 8:20:18 AM PDT by nralife (Tell Sen. John Cornyn we DO in fact want a real wall! 202-224-2934)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham; boop
Apparently the democrats who owned slaves

Don't you love it when people idiotically retroject contemporary political issues and debates back into past centuries? The fact that J.C. Calhoun or Jefferson Davis were Democrats in the 19th century doesn't mean that their policies had anything in common with Obama's, because what defined Democrats (Democratic Republicans early in their history) and Republicans (Federalists and Whigs earlier in their history) weren't the issues the define the parties today. In fact, the defining issue separating Democrats from Republicans during most of the 19th Century was States' Rights (Democrats) vs. a stronger Federal Government (Republicans).

Of course, the people who say "The Confederacy was evil because it was founded by Democrats" spout that line hoping that someone listening to them is stupid enough to believe that because Calhoun or Davis were "Democrats" they would have supported transgender bathrooms or social welfare programs for illegal immigrants today.

57 posted on 05/01/2017 8:28:15 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m not aware of Hitler having Jewish ancestry

But I do think he grew up resentful of Jews where he lived and saw that many were associated with the Mensheviks and Bolshies

Whom he detested

And he acted on that along with his nutty entourage to a degree rarely in recorded history


58 posted on 05/01/2017 8:31:25 AM PDT by wardaddy (Multiculturalism: Everyone wants to inhabit the world of white men with no white men in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24
The Confederate flag today is a great symbol against political correctness and needs to be displayed.

The confederate flag is not a flag against political correctness!!! When anyone does that, what everyone else sees is racism, then they tar anti-PC as a bunch of racists. WE ARE NOT. Well, at least most of us. Please leave the confederate flag at home.

And, yes, you might argue otherwise, but realize that 90% of the American people will and do make the association of the confederate flag and racism. Rightly or wrongly, and ignoring all the politics of the Civil War, you cannot ignore that the KKK, neo-Nazis, skinheads, and others have forever tarred the confederate flag as racist.

59 posted on 05/01/2017 8:31:59 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; wardaddy
What’s funny is that 99% of the people doing this belong to the party of the Confederacy.

What's even more funny is the fact that some conservatives eagerly support taking down Confederate monuments just because Confederates were Democrats, even though the Democrat/Republican ideological split in the 19th century had nothing to do with today's, and in spite of the fact that cheering the removal of Confederate monuments puts them on the same side of the issue BlackLivesMatter thugs and other leftist riffraff.

60 posted on 05/01/2017 8:35:59 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson