To: Helicondelta
BUILD THE WALL !
USE SEIZED MEX DRUG CARTELS $$$ TO PAY FOR IT
2 posted on
04/26/2017 11:48:02 PM PDT by
LeoWindhorse
(America First !)
To: Helicondelta
Congress proves themselves to be as much the LIAR as Barock Hussain O’Bama and BOTH PARTIES. The fools allow illegals to vote thus destroying the country and their do-nothing, know-nothing jobs. NO MORE PAYCHECKS for these imbecile no brainers.
3 posted on
04/27/2017 12:10:28 AM PDT by
V K Lee
(Amateurs built the ark; Professionals - the Titanic)
To: Helicondelta
Why would the GOP controlled Congress go against their cheap labor express globalist overloads? Face it, past GOP support for building the wall was pure pandering for votes. Like votes against Obamacare, the GOP knew full well building the wall would never be enacted.
5 posted on
04/27/2017 12:34:29 AM PDT by
buckalfa
(Slip sliding away towards senility.)
To: Helicondelta
6 posted on
04/27/2017 1:49:15 AM PDT by
MagnoliaB
(You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
To: Helicondelta
Hey, you pathetic gop capons...build the Damn wall! Quisling losers.
7 posted on
04/27/2017 1:59:34 AM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
To: Helicondelta
To: Helicondelta
It is time to kill the Senate filibuster. Repeal Obamacare, and if there is a replacement at all make it a pure GOP replacement. Fund the wall, even if there is not even one Democrat/Socialist vote for it. Eliminate useless FedGov spending. Let’s make this year count!
9 posted on
04/27/2017 2:23:02 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: Helicondelta
"Nancy Pelosi dismisses the wall as 'immoral, expensive and unwise.'
Start construction of the wall immediately while simultaneously working the funding, even if it means replacing the initial effort with upgraded sections at a later date. By then Mexico might want to purchase the old portions to erect on their southern border.
Encourage pelosi to inspect the southern side of the wall when it is fully functional.
To: Helicondelta
Folded on Obama care,the Wall,now folding on getting out of the fraud of climate change by staying in the a Paris climate agreement,next he will fold on tax cuts,Trump is not running the government,Ryan and the Rinks are
11 posted on
04/27/2017 2:52:23 AM PDT by
ballplayer
(hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
To: Helicondelta
Kinda figured this was going to happen. It boils down to money. Free chicken in every pot and I will set you free stuff. Trying to get 14 billion out of money transfers aint gonna work. If Jose is sending a couple of hundred dollars to Mexico via wire transfer he’ll stop doing that and hire a mule to take it by bus, boat or plane. He wants to send 500 down to Mrs. Jose so he pays a legal 100 in cash to take 500 in cash down and so on.
13 posted on
04/27/2017 3:24:03 AM PDT by
Dallas59
(Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
To: Helicondelta
For the record Charles....... Mexico is going to pay for the wall, not the American taxpayers
16 posted on
04/27/2017 4:38:22 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Hillary is Ameritrash, pass it on)
To: Helicondelta
Build the wall around CONgre$$, aka The Gang of 535. It should be a federal prison. Conmen/collectivists/creeps/criminals/deceivers/dolts/elitists/marxists/morons/liars/looters/progs/punks/rats/rinos/socialists/scumbags/tyrants/totalitarians and unipartarians have gutted this great republic.
20 trillion times worse than King George.
http://usdebtclock.org
Zero representation. Crickets.
Land of the thieves. (Socialism Is Legal Plunder - “The Law”; Bastiat).
Home of the $laves.
18 posted on
04/27/2017 5:24:55 AM PDT by
PGalt
To: Helicondelta
The GOP Has a Nuclear Option ...:
Rick Klein and Shushannah Walsh:Want to really blow up the Senate and fast?
A new proposal is emerging that would likely do just that, and it has nothing to do with Senate Democrats vow to filibuster Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.
A proposal is being pushed by some Senate Republicans that would seek to ensure that a House-passed bill could be passed intact by only a simple majority of senators.
How would that work?
Well, the vice president, of course, is the president of the Senate.
The thinking goes that if the Senate parliamentarian ruled that parts of the bill cant be folded into budget reconciliation, Vice President Mike Pence could simply overrule that.
Sen. Rand Paul wants the White House to make that commitment now:That alone, I think, would break the logjam, he told reporters Thursday.
Perhaps, but thats not all it would break.
This would be the executive branchs changing the rules of the upper legislative body.
Filibusters could be broken, perhaps in any circumstance, at the whim of the vice president.
In honor of a certain former veep, that would be a BFD.
Here's more from an excerpt from another source about the option of
"The Nuclear Option for Legislation in the Senate":
Cruz Pushes Obamacare Repeal Gambit That Could Roil the Senate
... Cruzs answer:lean on Vice President Mike Pences gavel to dodge those procedural limits and broaden the legislations scope.
Its not at all clear whether Cruzs colleagues will go along.
The move relies on a radical interpretation of the vice presidents constitutional role as presiding officer of the Senate,where he could step in and effectively overrule the chambers parliamentarian.
It would resemble the so-called nuclear option of ending filibusters ...
... Representative Dave Brat of Virginia, the conservative who unseated then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in a 2014 primary, told reporters he doesnt buy leaderships excuse that they cant pursue a far bolder plan.
He said Ryan is overstating the case that existing rules cant allow an insurance overhaul. He wants to be respectful of Senate rules, I do not, Brat said.
From what I understand, Brat said, whoevers sitting in the chair has authority over the parliamentarian.
So they can rewrite the rules.
To speed passage of an Obamacare replacement -- and circumvent Democratic opposition, Republicans opted for a budgetary procedure called reconciliationthat requires only a simple majority in the Senate,
but only if the legislation has minimal effect on the deficit.
GOP leaders, including Ryan, have said this is limiting their ability to include provisions popular with conservatives like selling insurance across state lines.
The Texas senator, who had dinner with Trump this week, said Ryan and Senate GOP leaders are wrong.
You dont need to override the parliamentarian or get a new parliamentarian.
It is the vice president who rules, he told reporters Thursday.
Having Pence rule against established norms for what is allowed in a reconciliation bill would undo decades of Senate tradition of deferring to the parliamentarians rulings.
It could also potentially allow both parties far wider latitude in the future to avoid a 60-vote threshold for all sorts of provisions that dont directly impact spending or taxes.
Representative Trent Franks of Arizona, another conservative, said trying to craft an Obamacare repeal bill to meet the Senates current interpretation of its rules is "untenable."
"... If you get the job done he looks a little differently on the other side," he said.
... "Under the Budget Act of 1974, which is what governs reconciliation, it is the presiding officer, the vice president of the United States, who rules what is permissible on reconciliation and what is not, Cruz said.
And that is a conversation I have been having with a number of my colleagues. ...
So in ending the DemocRATS
'political war', let me end my comment by stating,
"It's time to NUKE THE DemocRATS !"
24 posted on
04/27/2017 11:58:41 AM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson