Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

J. Edgar Comey: “Such Men Are Dangerous”
Michelle Obama's Mirror ^ | 3-21-17 | MOTUS

Posted on 03/21/2017 7:50:51 AM PDT by NOBO2012

j edgar hoover comey copy

So, did everyone enjoy yesterday’s kabuki theatre? Both the Comey testimony in the House and the Gorsuch hearing in the Senate was Congressional Open Mic Night at its best: pols otherwise unknown outside their home districts pontificating their respective talking points. Lately all Congressional hearings seem more like a game of reverse-rule Jeopardy: all contestants are required to ask their question in the form of an answer.

Occasionally a rookie lands a seat on the panel who doesn’t follow the rules and asks real questions:

Representative Elise M. Stefanik is a young, freshman republican congresswoman from the Albany New York area.  And using a probative questioning timeline, she single-handily pulled the mask from FBI Director James Comey, yet no-one seemed to notice. - CTH

Given that Congress was first notified about the investigation of the Trump campaign in July, 2016, Rep. Stefanik tries to find out when the sitting President was advised that his FBI had launched an investigation of the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with Russia. At what point did President Obama give tacit approval of the FBI investigation of the campaign of his Party’s opposition?

“when did you notify the White House, the DNI and congressional leadership”? - CTH

Or in other words, what did he know, and when did he know it?

Comey’s response is an uncomfortable study in obfuscation; watch the first 3 minutes carefully. He begs the question - in the form of an answer:

“Because of the sensitivity of the matter.” 

That covers a wide berth, but a reasonable man might conclude that Comey notified Obama at one of those “quarterly meetings” after July 16th and before the election. Which in my simple mind gives credence to Trump’s claim that the Obama administration was “wire-tapping” him. Fake News of course, disagrees with my conclusion: Comey's testimony humiliates Trump - The Washington Post. That’s why they’re Fake News.

So why, you ask, would a President not fire a troublesome FBI director like Comey who’s working both sides against the middle for his own nefarious purposes? As it often does, history once again provides an answer. Here’s LBJ’s response when asked why he didn’t fire J. Edgar Hoover:


Believe me, there’s nobody spookier than a high-level spook. Never underestimate the number of dossiers they have assembled nor the amount of “intelligence” that might be contained therein. Because you never know when you might need it.

comey machine gun copy“Ok, who wants me outside the tent?”

“Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look. He thinks too much. Such men are dangerous.” – Shakespeare, Julius Caesar

Posted from: Michelle Obama’s Mirror

TOPICS: Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: elisestefanik; jamescomey; jedgarhoover; trump

1 posted on 03/21/2017 7:50:51 AM PDT by NOBO2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NOBO2012

She was by far the most memorable and cutting questioner. Trey Gowdy acts like a prosecutor, but why didn’t he ask the Democrat shill, Comey, “ Did you leak any confidential information to any media outlet regarding Gen. Flynn?” A decent prosecutor is not afraid to ask such pertinent questions.

2 posted on 03/21/2017 7:54:18 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NOBO2012

Comey appears to be a wack job of J. Edgar Hoover proportions.

Check for dresses in his(?) closet.

3 posted on 03/21/2017 7:55:36 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NOBO2012

IMPEACH NOW - Repubs GROW A PAIR!!!!!!!!!!!

4 posted on 03/21/2017 8:11:27 AM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NOBO2012
It Took a Freshman GOP Congresswoman To Pull The Mask From FBI Director Comey…

5 posted on 03/21/2017 8:12:25 AM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

I think a lot of people, including Gowdy, know full well it was:

BILL -> Hillary
Hillary ->Podesta/Campaign (including Louise Mensch) and Sen. McCain
Hillary -> Lady Lynn de Rothschild, Soros, and their paid “newsies” incl John Schlicter, Maggie Haberman, Jennifer Rubin, and Louise Mensch (Rothschild may also have had the news from McCain).

6 posted on 03/21/2017 8:19:09 AM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Freshman Congressman Elise Stefanik was the only Repub showing a spine at the hearings. She bored in on Comey.

The rest of the spineless Repubs---including Gowdy---completely missed the significance of what Elise elicited: that the criminal Comey said he has had an investigation of the Trump campaign going since July 2016 and didn't disclose it, as is required. until a few minutes into the hearing.


Comey was smirking and dancing away from the questions, dismissing them blithely.........reinforcing his agenda: a massive "investigation"...... his attempt to take down Trump - on behalf of the Clintons.


At one point, Gowdy turned to look at Elise, to try to stop her....maybe intimidate she expertly exposed Comey.

Gowdy is getting to be so dam annoying. He lost his creds when he caved in to Hillary's demands....and let her walk on the Benghazi atrocity.

He'll try anything to recapture the headlines.

Elise was stealing the spotlight....and he apparently didn't like it.

7 posted on 03/21/2017 8:22:20 AM PDT by Liz ( w W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

I think you nailed it. The question that had to be asked was if he was the leaker.

8 posted on 03/21/2017 8:22:48 AM PDT by freefdny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NOBO2012

If I’m reading between the lines correctly both in the line of questioning and the responses, I infer based on the tenet that information is power, that executive/cabinet branch was briefed but legislative/leadership was excluded, based on the term “sensitivity”, to which no attempt was made to get clarification. Obviously he would not respond to these attempts with actual facts or intelligence/counter-intelligence details here, but there should have been a clarification found about the difference in why it’s too sensitive for congress and not for DNI, even if the obvious answer would have been that the former could be considered political and the later apolitical. Even if that’s a soft-pitch, I feel like it should be on the record

9 posted on 03/21/2017 8:22:56 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Elise is more about the defiant young girl staring down the Bull than anything the RATS can put up.

10 posted on 03/21/2017 8:36:48 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NOBO2012

Comey needs to recuse himself

11 posted on 03/21/2017 8:41:08 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make lemonade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; WildHighlander57; onyx

Wait till the follow up questions!

12 posted on 03/21/2017 9:20:41 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson