Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gen3 Glock20SF Goes Wrong while Testing against Level IIIA Plate
Am Shooting Journal ^ | 2/16/2017 | Jeremy S

Posted on 02/16/2017 5:50:39 AM PST by w1n1



Jeremy S Youtuber was out testing his Gen3 Glock20SF 10mm using the Underwood Ammo Xtreme Penetrator round against a Level IIIA plate used in a bullet proof vest, to see if the round would go through. Here’s what happened:

After squeezing the trigger BLAM! The shot was loud and debris peppered his face. There was a stinging feeling in his shooting hand. Once it registered in his brain what had happened he looked at the pistol. Sees the right side of his Gen3 Glock20SF frame had blown out, mag release missing.

Obviously, there were some flowery words that followed after the shot. Jeremy wished that he wore gloves while shooting but good thing he did have eye protection on. See the footage here.


TOPICS: Hobbies; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: banglist; glock20; handguns; leveliiia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Delmarksman

I had no idea they would fire out of battery. With higher pressure ammo these deficiencies become more problematic. Sounds like you were very lucky.

While using the original barrel I have had brass completely separate just above the case head. Didn’t do any damage and I don’t know if it had to do with the lack of chamber support.


21 posted on 02/16/2017 8:04:43 AM PST by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I bought a mod 22 when we lived in MN. The first box of shells saw two empty cases jam while coming out.
The St. Paul store’s gunsmith polished the enterior, removed a small burr and while he had it, I asked for trijicon sights to be installed.
The St. Paul PD had similar problems and I believe they turned in all the Clocks they had ordered...

No problems since.


22 posted on 02/16/2017 8:33:00 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

I’m glad that the shooter was not too terribly injured.
I thank him for giving me another reason to retain my nice little all-steel .38 Special snubnose revolver.


23 posted on 02/16/2017 8:48:14 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bereanway

Looks to me he had a after market barrel see how it sticks out the end of the slide before the shot.

Glock problem or after market barrel problem


24 posted on 02/16/2017 9:58:15 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

If I may ask, what is considered a “new” Glock? I purchased a Gen4 41 45 cal. three years ago, but have not fired it enough to flush out this problem.


25 posted on 02/16/2017 12:43:34 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper
Field strip your Glock. Grab the barrel, and drop a round into the chamber.

Look at how much brass is exposed at the feed ramp.

If it looks like the one on the left, you're good to go. If it looks like the one on the right, you're still OK as long as you don't shoot maximum (or over maximum) pressure rounds, and don't reload used brass.

You can also look at your fired brass and see if the cases have the "Glock Smile."


26 posted on 02/16/2017 3:47:29 PM PST by Yo-Yo ( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Crap! I have the unsupported. I wonder if Glock will replace.


27 posted on 02/16/2017 4:39:19 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Do you reload?
Do you shoot Underwood or Double Tap ammunition?
Does your spent brass have a very pronounced “Glock Smile?” (Most will have a little smile, so be discerning when examining the brass.)

If you answered no to all three, you’re fine. I am not an expert in Glock lineage, but I doubt that you truly have one of the “unsupported’ barrels if yours is a Gen 4 pistol.

If you have doubts, give Glock a call: 1 (770) 432-1202


28 posted on 02/16/2017 5:42:52 PM PST by Yo-Yo ( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

I’ve been told Glocks “Walk on Water!”


29 posted on 02/16/2017 7:32:03 PM PST by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Is that the gen 4 barrel on the left?

CC


30 posted on 02/16/2017 7:32:17 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

It’s an internet-stolen picture. Judging by the color, it’s probably a Lone Wolf aftermarket barrel.


31 posted on 02/17/2017 2:46:38 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I should be fine, since I do not reload pistol ammo, or use +P ammo. Now, I need to check for the smile by firing a few rounds. However, I never want to wonder about this, and get the supported barrel. Yes, I’ll call as well. You’ve been a big help! Thanks much, FRiend!


32 posted on 02/17/2017 6:23:53 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper
Any time, and honestly I wouldn't even worry the least bit about anything. Glocks are great guns (I own two) and the failure in this particular thread was caused by the ammunition, not any design defect by Glock.

Get to the range!

33 posted on 02/17/2017 8:15:35 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

My Gen 4 30 .45 looks like the one on the left, just checked it.


34 posted on 02/17/2017 12:55:56 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

Yes ma’am!


35 posted on 02/17/2017 9:49:53 PM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson