Posted on 12/17/2016 11:40:10 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
The following article was published in the Jewish World Review on November 16th of 2016.
By Walter Williams
For more than a half-century, it has become abundantly clear that our nation faces increasing irreconcilable differences. At the root is the fact that there is one group of Americans who mostly want to be left alone and live according to the rule of law and the dictates of the U.S. Constitution while another group of Americans wants to control the lives of others and ignore both the rule of law and constitutional restraints on the federal government. Should those Americans who favor the rule of law and constitutional government fight against or yield to those Americans who have contempt for the rule of law and constitutional government? Let's look at a few of those irreconcilable differences.
Some Americans prefer to manage their own health care needs. Others wish to have the federal government dictate their health care. Some Americans want their earnings to be taxed only for the constitutionally mandated functions of the federal government, which are outlined in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. Others think American earnings should be taxed for anything on which Congress can muster a majority vote. Though there is no constitutional authority for federal involvement in public education, some Americans want the federal government involved. The list of irreconcilable differences among the American people is nearly without end. These differences survive because of the timidity of those offended and the brute power of the federal government.
I think reconciliation is impossible; therefore, separation is the only long-term peaceful solution. Separation and independence do not require that liberty-loving Americans overthrow the federal government...
(Excerpt) Read more at thecoachsteam.com ...
His logic is horribly flawed. And he is twisting the discussion with speculation on many things. Hit piece.
red
His ability to articulate those ideas in our confused society makes him a great defender of economic liberty to those who hear him speak or read his books.
Please visit his web site for more examples.
Perhaps a review of The Federalist Papers might be in order for those of us unfamiliar with the Founders’ intent. A good place to start might be the discussion thread from 6 years ago.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2433293/posts
I forgot the link to the series:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2686142/posts
Just scroll down. There is a LOT of instructive discussion. There are some very smart folks on this site.
I have watched him on Fox many occasions and have never been impressed with his logic. In the times I have seen him on Fox he seems to consistently take the position opposite the rest of the board like they need someone to attack. And his fighting back normally doesn’t work.
But in summing up his article we saw, his logic is flawed and inconsistent using names and times out of context while blaming the federal government while not placing blame on particular people which is what constitutes the rule of law. There is no such thing as a victimless crime. Someone had to gain an advantage.
red
For those who don't want to cooperate in such pimping,
HERE IS THE ACTUAL SITE YOU SHOULD HAVE LINKED INSTEAD OF DIRECTING US TO YOUR SITE
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.