We had to stop the recount to prevent further evidence of voter fraud from showing up.Posted on 12/15/2016 5:58:22 AM PST by NOBO2012
Well somebody hacked the 2016 US presidential election. And if it wasn’t Russia then who was it?
Maybe it was Democratic operatives in Detroit where the ballot boxes in over 1/3 of the precincts were stuffed with votes for Hillary.
We had to stop the recount to prevent further evidence of voter fraud from showing up.
Or it may have been hacked by Jill Stein who decided to become the Clintons’ useful idiot by starting the “Discredit Trump” recount.
Or it may be by the on-going Liberal disinformation campaign that is behind the demand letter filed by 10 29 50 Electors to receive an intelligence briefing about the non-existent Russian hack (butt not the Detroit hack) prior to casting their votes on December 19th. You will be surprised that the Clinton Kamp supports this effort as well. The lead signer of the “open letter” demand is a California elector named Christine Pelosi, who happens to be Nancy’s daughter. Excerpt of the letter, via Andy Schlafly:
“We do not understand our sole function to be to convene in mid-December and summarily cast our votes,” the letter goes on. “The Constitution envisions the Electoral College as a deliberative body. Accordingly, we seek an unrestrained opportunity to investigate, discuss, and deliberate with our colleagues about whom to vote for.”
Would now might be a good time to point out that the Electoral College is a voting mechanism, not a deliberative body?
Deliberative Body
Not a Deliberative Body
No, the Constitution does not allow the Electoral College to deliberate; in fact, it prevents the electors from constituting themselves as a deliberative body. Electors are required to meet separately in each state, on the same day, and only the winning slate is eligible to attend each state’s meeting. - Andy Schlafly
Or maybe the hacker is Josh Earnest: if anyone has launched a Russian-style disinformation campaign it is the Obama administration and he is the current spokesmouth. In an attempt to discredit Obama’s successor they’ve launched an all-out assault which begins with stomping their feet and yelling “Russia!” and ends with stomping their feet and yelling “Russia!”
To which my only reply is; You. Cannot. Be. Serious. The people who invented fake news are also the same people who weaponized it. So I ask, who should we believe:
The CIA who’s director, John Brennan, lied to Congress about spying on them?
The ex-CIA guy (H/T Clarice), Mike Morell, who left in shame after orchestrating the false talking points about a video being behind the Benghazi terrorist attack that killed our ambassador and 3 other Americans?
Or the current Whitehouse hack, Josh Earnest, “the most egregious dissembler of them all. On a daily basis he sneers, lectures, hectors and lies to the press corps tasked with one of two things depending on the bias of the reporters asking questions: defend the President and/or smear the opposition.”
It wasn’t the Russians who hacked up all the hairballs butt once again, don’t take my word for it; the Daily Mail, as usual has the real source of the “hacks.” Spoiler alert: it ain’t Russia.
Go home and have a nice cup of tea Hillary.
Posted from: Michelle Obama’s Mirror
I think Putin is the scapegoat and Hillary’s side is putting the stories out there to stop Trump.
This is crazy. Notice she is extremely quiet....busy behind the scenes in my opinion.
Ya think? Putin has been a scapegoat since day 1. Its like the video with Benghazi, throw out a meme to see if it will stick and if it does, run with it until the crows roost in the barn and the cows come runnin hone.
I hope the cameras are rolling when SWAT busts up her little party. I would love to see a jackboot across her scrawny neck. Her husband and HubbleDaughter as well.
Cuffed and stuffed into a very deep and dark hole.
Former UK Ambassador Has Met the DNC Leaker
by S. Noble • December 15, 2016
Craig Murray on the left
The controversial former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray is an ally of Julian Assange and he insists he has met the leaker of the DNC and Clinton emails and it is not the Russians. The Russians did not hack the emails according to his numerous interviews and writings. We reported on this once before but have been reluctant to repeat it since Mr. Murray has a very colorful history of making some comments that people might call extreme and, like Assange, he has ties to the far-left.
However, we are hearing extreme comments from the hysterical and conspiratorial left with their handful of GOP collaborators as well. The US left is now the fringe, so which fringe shall we believe?
On the 11th, Mr. Craig wrote on his website:
I have watched incredulous as the CIA’s blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story – blatant because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it. There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.
He offers two point which are logical, more logical than what our administration is putting out:
A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they “know the individuals” involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of “We know who it was, it was the Russians” are beneath contempt.
As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.
Read at:
http://www.independentsentinel.com/former-uk-ambassador-has-met-the-dnc-leaker/
What’s up with the name “Michelle Obama’s Mirror”?
I almost never read the posts, because of the off-putting name.
Obviously a conservative blog/website, using the name of a disgusting tranny. Michelle Obama is soooooo REPULSIVE to me, that I just can’t click on these posts.
Why in the world would someone choose THIS name for their blog/site?
WHY????????????????????????????
I think the only people throwing a tantrum and caring about this are her fans and those who worked for her.
faucetman, you’re missing a fabulous blog. I don’t know who she is but she’s really sharp and her blogs are usually funny, pertinent, and sarcastic. I like those things myself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.