Posted on 11/25/2016 7:09:22 PM PST by rhett october
While it appears that Jill Stein has raised enough money, albeit suspiciously, to start a vote recount in Wisconsin, efforts have begun on the other side to challenge votes in three states won by Hillary Clinton: Colorado, Nevada and Virginia.
Operation Sabot 2016, started by the group Oath Keepers is contesting vote totals in Clark County in Nevada; Denver and Boulder Counties in Colorado; and Richmond, Fairfax, and Henrico Counties in Virginia.
(Excerpt) Read more at resistancefeed.com ...
This is something that should not be happening. Stein admitted there was no evidence of vote fraud. She has no hope of winning. Maybe in WI they will only count her votes and in only the counties contested. This is total bs. They really need to change their election laws so that this kind of chicanery cannot be done.
Well, we definitely need reasonable voter ID. The public should DEMAND this. Otherwise we will keep having the massive vote fraud - which is of course what SorosDNC want
No, Illinois, California and New York for recounts. Tied up those big Hillary states in certification. Which deadline they might not make so she loses. But more important you get the illegals voting in those states, the dead. Now you expose and the courts say clean up by next election.
I agree this should not be happening and the board of elections should have turned her down outright. But I blame the WI State GOP, Walker, Preibus and the Trump Campaign as much as Stein for allowing this to happen.
Last I heard GOP controls WI state government (Governor, Legislature and State Supreme Court). I can’t believe Walker and the state GOP Apparatus cannot of will not put the screws on the state board of elections and demand they kill this recount.
The GOP and Trump campaign still have options including first filing a formal objection with the state board of elections prior to the recount starting. Any candidate for President on the ballot can file an objection to the recount to the commission according to WI Law. The commission must take the objection to the recount under consideration and rule on the merits and grounds of the objection as to whether to stop the recount or go on with it. If that is the case, the GOP/Trump can pursue blocking the recount in court should the board reject their objection!
“They may well take WI and MI due as much due to state GOP and Team Trump laziness and/or cowardice to pull their muscle at least behind the scenes to block these recounts”
Why does our side of the aisle have people this stupid on it?
Do some of you ever bother to think before you post, or did some seriously convince you that you know what you are talking about?
“I agree this should not be happening and the board of elections should have turned her down outright. But I blame the WI State GOP, Walker, Preibus and the Trump Campaign as much as Stein for allowing this to happen.”
Wisconsin law makes it legal for a candidate to ask for this by a deadline and if you have money to pay for it.
Now tell us, oh smart blowhard, how you break the law just because you don’t like this?
there you go....seems the creeps waited just long enough for the good guys to petition the actual fraud votes in Va/etc...
STFU
So do you have an answer? No?
Just shooting off your mouth?
Well ok then.
I like this. Beat them at their own game.
Oh that would rock because it would also probably throw out the votes that passed Question 1.
Looks like you have no problem shooting off your pie hole?
Oh please.
Someone has to balance out this nonsense from some of you.
Actually I have an answer for you numbnuts.
Do you have faith that the ballots in Wisconsin have been kept secure and not tampered with in any way since the original vote count was completed?
Do you know that the Wisconsin Board of Elections is willing to delay certification so Stein can have a hand recount done of the entire state?
Do you know that they want to look at each and every 88,000 rejected votes to discern the will of the voter and then count that previously rejected ballot (just like the rats tried to do in Florida in 2000)?
Do you know that they also want to review all the previously rejected provisional ballots to see if they are now eligible for counting?
Do you know that the Trump Campaign (or any other Presidential candidate on the ballot in this case) also has the right under Wisconsin law to formally object to the recount and that the board of elections must hear and consider the objection(s) and vote to continue the recount or stop the recount based on the objections presented?
So far nothing but silence from either the mighty Wisconsin GOP establishment or the Trump Campaign. Like I said earlier, the GOP dominates Wisconsin state government and this recount nonsense should have been stopped by the board of elections, which also has the authority to reject a recount request on its’ own (bet you didnt’ know that numbnuts).
Too bad Walker isn’t more ruthless behind the scenes.
Folks have every right to be concerned that the rats have a decent chance to steal Wisconsin and that Trump’s 27,000 vote lead may not be all that safe considering the 88,000+ rejected ballots Stein will have re-examined and counted if “the will of the voter can be discerned”.
I sure hope Michigan does not also cave and give this lady her recount and make her get a court order before they have to do any kind of recount.
Thank God that Pennsylvania will likely be Trump’s impenetrable Firewall and there will likely not be any recount done in the state, due to their strict recount request rules and also that critical deadlines have passed for requesting re-canvassing/recounts in the counties.
First, Pennsylvania will certify the election on Monday, then Stein must go to court and face a state appellate judge and present evidence of either mass voter fraud in several counties or wildly inconsistent vote counts between the original and recount totals in multiple counties. Then the judge will decide whether or not to allow a challenge of the election and order a statewide recount.
Stein has already stated publicly, along with her “experts” that they have no evidence of anything, just theories.
Do NOT underestimate the rats ability to cheat or try to cheat to steal an election, even if they are 27,000 votes behind!
Rats are desperate right now, come January 20, 2017 they will be shut out of power entirely at the Federal and state level in most states.
If they can get away with stealing MI and WI (not likely PA) they will do it knowing the MSM will be silent on their stealing those states.
“Do you have faith that the ballots in Wisconsin have been kept secure and not tampered with in any way since the original vote count was completed?”
Your answer is just more conspiracy clap-trap. No different than the morons screaming that the Dems were going to steal every blasted state in the nation.
And when Trump won, you guys thankfully looked like idiots and disappeared.
And now here you all are again.
“So far nothing but silence from either the mighty Wisconsin GOP establishment or the Trump Campaign. “
Well obviously they should be in a cold panic like all of the wannabe Alex Jones clones on FR, huh? Because we all know the dems have “manufactured” 20 thousand votes, and magically slipped them past EVERYONE.
Maybe their need to not freak out should give you some HINTS, numbnuts.
“Do NOT underestimate the rats ability to cheat or try to cheat to steal an election, even if they are 27,000 votes behind!”
I don’t embellish it seeing that all of the screaming about their “massive fraud machine” didn’t amount to squat on Nov 8th.
Time will tell if you are right or not, but you should not jump on people for expressing legitimate concerns, numbnuts.
If you don’t like it here on FR, maybe you should go somewhere else, numbnuts (you should change your FR handle to that, it fits you perfectly), LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.