Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ash Carter’s Force of the Future: Fatsoes, Druggies, Trannies and Trendies
US Defense Watch ^ | November 3, 2016 | Ray Starmann

Posted on 11/03/2016 5:10:54 PM PDT by pboyington

The US military is looking for a few fat pot heads…

According to the Washington Times, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter spoke on “Force of the Future” military reforms this week that may involve relaxed recruiting rules on everything from single-parent enlistees to drug use and obesity.

“We’re going to review and update these standards as appropriate,” Mr Carter said, “Now, some of these things we’ll never be able to compromise on. And we will always have to maintain high standards. But at the same time, these benchmarks must be kept relevant for both today’s force and tomorrow’s, meaning we have to ensure they’re not unnecessarily restrictive.”

How is the military planning on maintaining high standards when it allows physically unqualified personnel, aka overweight people to serve in its ranks?

Carter continued to ramble on…

“Today young Americans from rural areas are two times more likely to join the military than young Americans from urban areas. We would be missing an opportunity if we kept fishing only in the same geographic ponds we always have. Instead, we need to seize that opportunity by fishing in more ponds, new ponds, and ponds we haven’t been to in a long time. We have to draw talent from our country’s entire pool of population for our all-volunteer force.”

What a surprise, the military isn’t getting a huge pool of people from Venice Beach, Greenwich Village and Haight Ashbury. But, they should open recruiting stations in liberal enclaves, since the military’s values no longer represent Mid-America, but counter-culture, freak show America.

Ash Carter’s ‘Force of the Future’ is an unmitigated, unqualified, unsatisfactory farce in camouflage. Apparently, nothing is off limits in the military of 2016. You’re fat, no problem, they’ll find a uniform for you. You’re a druggie, no big deal, light up. You’re having gender identity issues, no sweat, you can get the genitals of your choice courtesy of Uncle Samantha. You’re a lactating mother, who wants to be a Green Beret, no problemo, breast feeding stations will be provided for you at the Q Course and on deployments.

De Oppresso Lactation…

Last weekend, I visited the battlefields at Gettysburg. In July of 1863, elements from the Army of the Potomac and the Army of Northern Virginia clashed in the epic battle of the Civil War, in a three day slugfest around the Pennsylvania town that inflicted 51,000 killed, wounded and missing in action on both sides.

The bravery and self-sacrifices exhibited by Johnny Rebs and Billy Yanks was on a level that would be hard for many in today’s self-consumed selfie world to even contemplate, much less exhibit.

At Oak Ridge, in Devil’s Den, on Little Round Top, in the Wheatfield and from Seminary Ridge to the Copse of Trees, the soldiers of the Blue and the Gray gave all that mortality can give.

Though the Battle of Gettysburg took place in 1863, many of the factors and traits needed to prevail there are still relevant to today’s military.

The nature of war and the role of the combat arms has and will never change until war itself is extinct. Their mission is the same as it was at Gettysburg, to seize and hold ground and to destroy the enemy violently and swiftly. The nature of war has nothing to do with gender identity politics, feminism, LGBT rights, maternity leave, lactation stations and sensitivity training.

War is still a brutal business where physical strength, speed and the spirit of the bayonet win the day. Many of the things a soldier needed to win at Gettysburg are still prevalent today: guts, more guts, endurance, upper body strength, unit esprit de corps, a killer instinct, weapons knowledge and did I mention guts.

In war there is no substitute for victory. In war, fat soldiers die. In war, the weak and the sensitive are disposed of and left for the crows.

In 1991, the military’s suppression of the press and control of information released to the public during the Gulf War, created the allusion that modern war is nothing more than a video game where missiles and laser guided bombs cripple the enemy and the Army and the Marines simply come in to mop up. That wasn’t the case in 1991 and it certainly wasn’t the case in the Iraq War and in Afghanistan where combat there was as brutal in many ways as Gettysburg.

Ash Carter is your typical liberal do-gooder bonehead who thinks that the US military is no different than corporate America, except military people wear uniforms, use weapons and say ‘yes sir’ and ‘yes ma’am.’

Social engineers like Ash Carter have managed, with help from the cowardly lions in the JCS, to completely unravel 240 years of US military traditions and standard operating procedure, all for the sake of placating leftist wackos who have never served a day in uniform and who wouldn’t know a M-16 from a F-16.

The US military in 2016 has become a repository for the physically weak, mentally ill trans-genders, homosexuals and feminist crackpots, while creating an atmosphere that is a cancer inside the military.

Carter’s newest decision to allow obese soldiers and druggies into the ranks further weakens a US military that is already on its last leg.

Ash Carter’s ‘Force of the Future’ is nothing more than a liberal, trendy weakling that will be slaughtered on a future battlefield.


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: ashcarter; feminism; military; obesity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2016 5:10:54 PM PDT by pboyington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Deplorables to the front!


2 posted on 11/03/2016 5:11:55 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

3 posted on 11/03/2016 5:12:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Left out fudge packers


4 posted on 11/03/2016 5:15:06 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (NoHellary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Where’s Gunny Highway when you need him?


5 posted on 11/03/2016 5:16:35 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

You go to war with the Army you’ve got


6 posted on 11/03/2016 5:16:39 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Putin is laughing his a$$ off. Next Carter will issue guns with flags that say “bang”.


7 posted on 11/03/2016 5:17:15 PM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington
And, after one major engagement, when all the fatsos, druggies, trannies and trendies have been reduced to puddles of red goo, some new upstart will say: "Hey wait a minute! What if we try recruiting men?"

Of course the Republic may not survive that first major engagement.

8 posted on 11/03/2016 5:18:14 PM PDT by lafroste (Look at my profile page. Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

That is the idea.


9 posted on 11/03/2016 5:21:40 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

There’s been an ongoing conversation about how to go about recruiting people to be “green-suiter” cyber warrior types. That kind of talent is usually very expensive and not exactly inclined to the military life. This appears to be a push to maneuver recruiting standards around getting such people. The recruitment PT test is another one. It’s not a terrible idea, b/c it really is a problem that needs a solution. It’ll be interesting to see how it all goes down.


10 posted on 11/03/2016 5:23:04 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington
In war, fat soldiers die.

So do skinny soldiers.

11 posted on 11/03/2016 5:26:32 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak
Yes, you go to war with the Army you have, but then you pull out all the freakin' stops to build the friggin' military as fast as you can!! Just because you're weak and ill-equipped at the start of the war doesn't mean you stay that way!

Geez...Rummy was a flippin' dimwit, and he served a dimwit president. This war could have been over in nine months.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho! God Bless Texas!

12 posted on 11/03/2016 5:33:14 PM PDT by wku man (Just One Gun, the latest from 10 Pound Test - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6uFqQenIU4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Our wars over the years killed hundreds of thousands of intelligent, masculine, alpha males and left the infirm home to procreate. Some of those courageous military men made it back alive but we’ve wasted our best and brightest.


13 posted on 11/03/2016 5:42:06 PM PDT by lucky american (Progressives are attacking our rights and y'all will sit there and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

CHEECH and CHONG go to war.. it’ll fill theater seats.

So will uh uh smoke.


14 posted on 11/03/2016 5:45:54 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

single-parent enlistees


Wow. They’ve really been selecting against single-parent guys? Ozzie and Harriet doesn’t really describe America today, folks.


15 posted on 11/03/2016 5:47:15 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Running out of cannon fodder, eh?


16 posted on 11/03/2016 5:48:58 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Aided and abetted by Ray Mabus’ destruction of the Navy and Marine Corps.


17 posted on 11/03/2016 5:49:36 PM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

Once we’ve completed eliminating “toxic” masculinity, there won’t be any men, so that problem solves itself.


18 posted on 11/03/2016 5:49:44 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

its okay to pick on fatsos, but please throw in the skinny weak males that we seem to be breeding.....the snowflakes....


19 posted on 11/03/2016 5:51:47 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

“Call for Sgt. Jass, Sgt. Hugh Jass, pick up the courtesy telephone.”


20 posted on 11/03/2016 5:52:35 PM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson