Posted on 10/25/2016 7:35:43 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
Following the release of the Project Veritas Action videos, Anderson Cooper discussed the videos on a CNN panel, calling the videos damning.
In other words, the geniuses at CNN haven’t found evidence of doctoring or any other way to discredit the PV videos.
Cute how they keep qualifying O’Keefe as “less than accurate” or “discredited” in the first 30 seconds of the segment.
The liberal media have basically ignored these videos because they don’t like how damning they are.
They also dismissed the wikileaks emails because they are more concerned with distraction away from the damning evidence - blame the ruskies.
The liberal media have basically ignored these videos because they don’t like how damning they are.
They also dismissed the wikileaks emails because they are more concerned with distraction away from the damning evidence - blame the ruskies.
Anderson Cooper is the Paris Hilton of msm broadcast news droids
If you’ve caught ANY of the Liberal talking heads discussing PVA, the first words out of their mouths are about how “it’s impossible to take seriously anything put out by a convicted felon”.
(Never mind that the guy Creamer is exactly that)
But wait. A felon? According to that bastion of legal information Wikipedia:
“The charges in the case were reduced from a felony to a single misdemeanor count of entering a federal building under false pretenses.[66][67] O’Keefe and the others pleaded guilty on May 26. O’Keefe was sentenced to three years’ probation, 100 hours of community service and a $1,500 fine. The other three men received lesser sentences”
These charges were in connection with his “illegal entry” to the federal office of Senator Mary Landrieu.
So if a person was charged with a felony that was later reduced to a misdemeanor that he plead guilty to, does that make him a “convicted felon”?
As that bitch Mary Ann Marsh who said it last night on O’Reilly.
I get 2 things from this
1) The uniparty and their media has to make sure that any journalist who disagrees with them is “discredited” so their journalism can be ignored in the future. Doesn’t matter what DEMOCRATS say on tape or what O’keefe has actually done in the past, only that they can claim that O’keefe is discredited so this story should be ignored.
2) Make sure any illegal activity a campaign wants to do is done by a contractor so the campaign can deny involvement (even when the contractor says on video that he’s working for the campaign through 2 intermediaries to hide it and independent wikileaks email says the contractor is having phone calls with the campaign at the time).
This also reinforces my feeling that a significant percent of US voters are dumber than a bag of rocks. Otherwise some of these comments by the panel would never be said.
watch the LYING BITCH say it right here at 2:30, from the O’Reilly Factor last night:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaXwB350-eE
Cute how they keep qualifying O’Keefe as “less than accurate” or “discredited” in the first 30 seconds of the segment.
It’s what they do. Kill the messenger. Overlook the message.
This is part of the Democrats use of Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) to shape the thought process of the masses. If they do this enough O’Keefe will be a discredited felon and not a creditable source. They all have the talking points and repeat them. The liberal on O’Rilley last night couldn’t wait to spout out her assigned verbiage... same thing on Bret Bair. I think some of them must get paid for getting it on air. They are relentless.
How on earth can they say these videos are discredited when they fired the two people exposed? The dems themselves have given full credit to the videos!
Exactly. Never mind what the Wikileaks emails reveal - we should all be disgusted that the Russians may be behind the hacking?
I was told by several right here the corrupt media would never talk about these damaging videos.
And for those who have not seen this following video, I strongly suggest you take 4 minutes and watch this:
“Michael Moore Explains Why TRUMP Will Win”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKeYbEOSqYc
O’Keefe is a convicted felon, so he must be disbelieved?
Rober Creamer is convicted felon married to a congress critter and is a paragon?
Is that correct?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.