Posted on 10/19/2016 2:57:52 PM PDT by bobsunshine
Back in September we wrote about the circumstances leading up to the "Oh Shit" moment when Paul Combetta of Platte River Networks deleted Hillary's 30,000 "personal emails" (the full notes is here: "The "Oh Shit" Moment: Hillary Wiped Her Server With BleachBit Despite Subpoena").
Within the original FBI interview notes, Hillary "stated she never deleted, nor did she instruct anyone to delete, her e-mails to avoid complying with FOIA, State, or FBI requests for information." Moreover, just last week, in sworn testimony provided to Judicial Watch, Hillary also denied asking for the emails to be deleted. That said, a new email discovered in the latest WikiLeaks dump seems to offer a direct contradiction to what Hillary previously told both the FBI and Judicial Watch.
So which version is true?
- FBI Notes: "Clinton stated she was also unaware of the March 2015 e-mail deletions by PRN."
- Judicial Watch Testimony: "She believes that her personal e-mails were not kept, and she does not have any personal knowledge about the details of that process."
- Private Talking Points (WikiLeaks): "As I said in March, I chose not to keep the personal ones. I asked that they be deleted."
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
When a sitting POTUS got off scott free from perjury in a Federal Civil Right Case, it should have given you a clue. The laws don’t apply to the Clintons and they never have
The thought of a broken American Republic literally makes me weep; so many lives lost and gambled for nothing. Many of my relatives put it on the line (primarily my Father and Grandfather) and it sickens me to see it come to this. I’m only 43, and I never imagined it getting so close to ruin.
That said, I know that ultimately my citizenship is not of this world, and in that I have comfort and purpose.
God’s law cannot be bought off or corrupted. From His justice there is no escape.
That’s my only comfort barring a revolution.
Actually, this what she was saying. Read the beginning paragraph - “when I left the State Department”
Arlington pops into my mind. I totally agree with you.
No reasonable prosecutor would bring such a slam-dunk case. This ain’t your father’s FBI.
#6. Doyou mean to say Hillary’s lawyers could be in trouble?
I don’t think I could ever go there, Id probably get so emotional I’d have a frickin stroke lol.
Whats the deal?? Links to posts are being “memory holed” left and right?? I read a post & attempt to go to link and get a file not found, or server timed out, etc...seems awfully suspicious!!!
I have no words.
Others are working out what her testimony will be. The e-mail is from September 2015, the hearing was in October
wasn’t there a thread days/a week ago with wiki emails that talked of Hillary took care of it herself? FR’s were commenting she was not in public much and it would take her a while to review/delete them herself?
just read you tag line after reading you comment.
Sorry on the loss of your Dad a few months ago. I’m very grateful for his and your family’s service to our country. Even if it doesn’t mean much to some self focused greedy people in our country it means a lot to many of us, and above all else it pleases God because they honored Him and their family and countrymen.
Better is one day in His court then thousands elsewhere :) I weep for the foolish who will spend thousands elsewhere.
Psalm 84:10 “A single day in your courts is better than a thousand anywhere else! I would rather be a gatekeeper in the house of my God than live the good life in the homes of the wicked.”
Thank you Ma’am, your sentiments mean a lot to me. :)
Pops went quick. He and Grandpops were instrumental in my road to conservatism/patriotism so as much as losing them hurts (and ironically enough they both passed at 64, Dad by massive stroke, Grandpa by cancer) they gave more to me when they were alive than their loss took away.
I carry their legacy in my heart with pride.
There are no “oh shit” moments ... the media are ignoring everything being uncovered about her. To quote the empty headed Cankles ... At this point, what difference does it make? The media are helping the Dems ruin this country.
I’m thinking, that at some point, some high profile person with lots of money is gonna get rolled up by the Feds. At that time they’ll use this defense and depending on their net worth and connections, just might get away with it.
If/when that happens, you might as well remove 18 USC 1001, as it will be used by everyone after that and be rendered invalid. Of course, all that means is that the Feds will have to do “REAL” police work, like regular cops, instead of being able to rely on the Federal Code to intimidate people.
I’m pretty sure that Tampering w Evidence and Suborning Perjury are legit crimes.
bkmk
Why the heck isn’t this bigger news? Even the conservative media isn’t playing it much.
Are they afraid it will help Trump?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.