To: thefixisin
Too bad it had to be the Enquirer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Be Careful
Hoping Trump doesn’t touch this with a 100 ft pole.
4 posted on
10/18/2016 12:58:34 PM PDT by
Jay Thomas
(If not for my faith in Christ, I would despair.)
To: Be Careful
The Enquirer took down John Edwards.
6 posted on
10/18/2016 12:59:02 PM PDT by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
Finding that she got hacked with the emails would’ve been better!
7 posted on
10/18/2016 12:59:16 PM PDT by
KavMan
To: Be Careful
Yes. That name gives the media the chance to ignore it completely. The rag might have been right on John Edwards, but they’ve also lost libel suits to folks like Carol Burnett and have been a punchline for decades.
Unless a video or some live witnesses come forth, this is going nowhere. Disappointing.
8 posted on
10/18/2016 12:59:23 PM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: Be Careful
John Edwards wishes it hadn’t been National Enquirer.
To: Be Careful
The other fool who ran with Kerry; his love child story broke on the enquirer
To: Be Careful
"Too bad it had to be the Enquirer"
That's what he said.
15 posted on
10/18/2016 1:00:26 PM PDT by
Jaxter
(Si vis pacem para bellum.)
To: Be Careful
The Enquirer scooped a lot of folks on other stories like the Anthrax Attacks after 911. And on other stuff too. But Drudge frequently links to INFOWARS and I wouldn't trust Alex Jones if he proclaimed that the sky was the color blue. I'd have to go check for myself. So I have to chortle when somebody writes: "Drudge wouldn't post unless the story is credible." Yeah right!
19 posted on
10/18/2016 1:00:49 PM PDT by
ExSoldier
("Terrorists: They hate you yesterday, today, and tomorrow. End it, no more tomorrows for them!)
To: Be Careful
31 posted on
10/18/2016 1:02:23 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: Be Careful
Given the MSM is in the bag for Hillary who did you expect? They are all playing by the sames rules now.
33 posted on
10/18/2016 1:02:33 PM PDT by
Lent
To: Be Careful
The Pulitzer Prize winning National Enquirer, might I add? /h
To: Be Careful
Enquirer broke Lewinsky....
However, it is clear... someone is going to vote for Hillary no matter what she’s done... The key is for the Trump supporters to not fall for the psyops going on trying to convince them its over, don’t bother showing up.
Hillary support is where it was, and always will be, only hope of a win is supressing turnout for Trump.... THat’s all taht’s going on right now, massive coordinated attempts to deject Trump voters... Hopefully folks will not fall for the crap.
To: Be Careful
The Enquirer is where a good portion get their only news.
42 posted on
10/18/2016 1:03:36 PM PDT by
bgill
(From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
To: Be Careful
If I recall, the Enquirer broke the story about John Edwards love child.
To: Be Careful
“Too bad it had to be the Enquirer”
If it’s still placed at all the checkout counters, that cover will have an impact on women.
To: Be Careful
The E.nquirer is more legit than the LSM anymore. They wouldn’t touch a story that dares go against the narrative that HILLARY the Queen is perfect and she’s winning.
61 posted on
10/18/2016 1:06:24 PM PDT by
uncitizen
(JFK: The first victim of the New World Order)
To: Be Careful
Well Was Rock Hudson aids infected homo? Did Hart like to play with his Rice ?
62 posted on
10/18/2016 1:06:28 PM PDT by
al baby
(Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
To: Be Careful
A helluva lot more people read the NE or at least see the headlines and cover, than read the NYT. And at this point the news in the NE is a lot more credible.
80 posted on
10/18/2016 1:09:37 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: Be Careful
102 posted on
10/18/2016 1:14:23 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Be Careful
Not that they aren’t right occassionally, and not that I am unwilling to believe it of her, but you’re right.
120 posted on
10/18/2016 1:20:56 PM PDT by
chesley
(The right to protest is not the right to disrupt.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson