Posted on 10/17/2016 3:37:25 PM PDT by Rufus Shinra
The FBI has made public a slew of documents related to the investigation around Hillary Clinton and allegations that classified information has improperly handled during her tenure as Secretary of State. The revelations they found were startling, as outlined in the many hundreds of pages of internal transcripts that were released, which show Clinton's blatant disregard for not just protocol, but also common decency and professional behavior.
One agent with the Department of Homeland Security that was interviewed related a "stark difference" between the State Department under Condoleezza Rice and her successor Hillary Clinton.
The agent describes how although Rice adhered to strict security and diplomatic protocols, Hillary Clinton "frequently and blatantly" disregarded them.
Clinton's disregard for State Department security and diplomatic protocols also led to complaints by ambassadors, who were frequently "insulted and embarrassed" by these breaches in protocol. The agent continues, describing Clinton's breaches as "well known" throughout Diplomatic Security staff and were "abundant", indicating these incidents didn't just happen at random, but were part of an overall disregard for security.
Finally, as highlighted at the end of this page, the agent also notes that Clinton's Chief of Staff and long time confidante Huma Abedin wielded much greater power and influence than previous Chiefs of Staff. It is stated that she was "often responsible for overriding security and diplomatic protocols on behalf of Clinton." This would indicate that these breaches of protocol were not the result of incompetent staff, but rather an intentional direction from Hillary Clinton to the entire State Department.
This transcript is page number 43 of the FBI's Clinton documents release part 4 and can be found at this link.
The honest confession by the agent in these transcripts goes along with what most voters should already know about Hillary Clinton. She has a complete disregard for security protocols and will breach established policies as she pleases with a total lack of concern for any negative consequences. Clinton's reckless decisions could lead to disastrous outcomes for not only her staff, but our government and entire country.
But, as Hillary Clinton would say, "What difference at this point does it make?"
The scandals and corruption that spread throughout the State Department under Hillary Clinton are shocking, and it seems any entity that the Clintons are in charge of ends up being managed in the reckless manner. Can you imagine that instead of just corrupting a single department of our government, Hillary Clinton is put in charge of our entire country and allowed to instate similar disregards for security?
Judging by Clinton's past results in leading organizations into a spiral of corruption, the impact on our nation would be catastrophic if she were to be elected as president.
Seen this?
Gaijin wrote: “The daughter of the FOUNDER of the Muslim Brotherhood personally DIRECTED the overriding of US security protocol.
Read it again. And again.
Doesn’t it sound absolutely amazing..?”
Yes it does. Please see my post above.
bookmark
What she did was publicly showed foreigners that they could piss on the Ambassador, the flag and Americans, because she did so herself.
She is not fit to lead. She is not fit to be President.
I honestly believe that Hilary and the state department, deferred to Huma Abedin as a “ME expert” decision maker during the Benghazi attacks. I believe she recommended the stand down to show deference and respect to the “protesters”.
True that
It is time for us to take back our country. Vote Trump
Get Out The Vote
Makes perfect sense to me.
She establishes the habit of refusing to ride in the same limousine with the local ambassador.
That way, should the ambassador’s limo be ambushed, we’ll all just assume it was her everyday arrogance that saved her. Nobody will suspect she & Huma orchestrated the hit.
Heck, one was even killed.
is there any video of Hillary
letting Huma have precedence
(or whatever it is called in Diplomat-speak)
before the US ambassador to that country?
Interesting. I had never considered putting Huma into the Benghazi equation...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.