Posted on 10/11/2016 7:48:04 AM PDT by kevcol
An irritated Chuck Todd on Monday chided Donald Trump for highlighting women who have accused Bill Clinton of sexual abuse. Talking about Sunday’s debate in which the businessman did a press conference with Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey, among others, the NBC journalist complained, “Only in the, sort of, the mind of some sort of movie writer of a third world democracy or dictatorship would you have a candidate publicly humiliate a former occupant of that office by parading all of these other people around.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
They have other articles calling Donald Trump acting like a dictator. Won't work... Because we know they are the ones that want to silence everyone.. Not Donald.. Free speech is not a dictatorship... It is freedom....
I doubt either Clinton feels “shame”. Anger yes, shame no.
Even honorable people occasionally do things they later regret but it is what they do after being exposed that shows their character.
After he was exposed to having a young intern give him BJ in the Oval Office an honorable man would apologize and resign. Clinton looked us in the eye and lied while his wife set out to destroy the young lady. No shame expressed then or any time sense.
The Clintons can not be shamed, the best we can hope for is that they are exposed for the things they have done.
No, Toddler, Bill did that to himself, with Hillary’s assistance.
Gee Chuck Todd,
1) Only a guilty person would be “humiliated” by being confronted with his victims. A falsely accused person might see them as lying crooks, but would have no reason to feel humiliation.
2) Your comment therefore reveals that you believe Clinton is guilty.
3) How can you be such an ass as to believe Clinton is guilty, yet find it wrong for the victims to discomfit Clinton by existing? Should his victims shut up and hide lest Bill be embarrassed by his guilt?
4) The notion that an ex-President, should be held to LOWER standards than a common criminal is disgusting.
5) Are all ex-Presidents above the law or just Clintons? Oh, no other ex-Presidents have been rapists and criminals, so it only applies to Clintons by default.
Each side is parading the dirty laundry of the other side in public. The only difference between the sides is that the party opposing Trump is 100% in support of their nominee's actions, and they still completely support the scoundrel. Trump's party has been looking for ways to abandon him. Plus, so-called journalists have dropped any pretense of impartiality and have chosen a candidate and are actively engaged in destructive warfare on their opponent candidate.
I hope he’s kidding. If “parading” the women you have raped is humiliating, perhaps the problem is the rapist and not the person who invites the victims to speak out.
What did they expect from Trump, other than fighting fire with fire? He’s always been pugnacious and has always fought back. Drag his name and reputation through the mud, expect the same in return. For better or worse, that’s just how he is.
That’s close .. Bill really humiliated himself; he’s just too arrogant and self-centered to notice.
At one of his rallies, Trump should read off a list of so-called reporters and their connections to the current administration as well as to Hillary Clinton.
It's incestuous.
Kathleen Willey was attacked by Clinton. Those who didn’t know before know that now.
What hasn’t been mentioned recently, as far as I know, is that on that same day, or a day soon before or after, her husband “committed suicide”. Kathleen believes he was offed by the Clinton Crime Family. I believe his name is on the “Clinton Body Count” list.
As if Hillary did not assay to publicly humiliate “the vast right wing conspiracy” - conspiracy to tell the truth - about Bill Clinton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.