Posted on 10/01/2016 8:39:16 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
United Nations International Telecommunications Union (ITU)
Welcome to Day 1 of the World Wide Web under new—foreign—management.
As quickly as you could say Barry Soetoro the Internet was all but officially stamped ‘Made in China’ at midnight last night.
No notice of the dramatic change was made by the New York Times, Washington Post or any of the other mainstream media power brokers.
But Andrea Zelinski of the Houston Chronicle did report at 7:20 p.m., Friday that a federal judge had rejected Attorney General Ken Paxton’s 11th-hour attempt to keep the internet address book under U.S. control:
Once the UN gets taxing authority, it becomes the de facto world government.
This may give them that authority.
The US Congress is complicit!!! Vote them OUT.
Go Trump
10 years from now the Internet will definitely be completely censored unless Trump wins and takes the Internet back from UN control
Icann now controls the Internet. The USA controlled the Internet from its beginning in the early 1990’s to yesterday.
The UN( The evil cabal of authoritarian dictators and Islamics) controls Icann which controls the Internet now thanks to evil Obama giving it away to them.
anyone who thinks these villains, won’t try to censor the Internet is insane.
Just one way they could do it is to put pressure on search engines like Google to put websites that they don’t approve on black lists(remove them from search results so people can’t find these websites).
when will this start? who knows but as the years go on you will see less and less websites that don’t espouse what these villains believe, nothing about freedom, nothing good, nothing critical of Islam , nothing pro USA or conservatism etc.
A poster here arhur wildfire posted an Icann appliction .
Anyone think If I try to start a website called Islam Is the Problems .com that Icann will approve it? If you then post it here.
The founders tried to prevent this.
They put the natural born citizen requirement in there.
Barry Soetoro/Barack Hussein Obama should be proof enough of the wisdom of the founders when they tried to prevent him from being President by requiring someone who could only be a US citizen and nothing else.
Born here of citizen parents.
Naturally a US citizen because there is no other possibility.
One cannot be anything else and also be a natural born citizen.
Obama told us he was born a British Subject.
Who believes Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Jay, Monroe, Madison, etc. would have found him to be a natural born citizen?
Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009, happened with the complete cooperation of both parties.
They want the Constitution changed without the hassle of amending the Constitution.
Confuse people about the clear meaning of a three word phrase and voila, every anchor baby and Winston Churchill is eligible.
The bench was the reason the GOP went along with the fig leaf resolution for McCain that was used by the Democrats as cover for Obama.
Jindal, Rubio, Haley and Cruz were all up and comers and the future of the party and ineligible.
The truth of the Kenyanesian Usurpation will never see the light of day because both parties cooperated in the violation of the Constitution
You can thank the US Congress for this one. They could easily have stopped this long ago.
Whereas I don’t disagree with you on Obama’s hidden birth, you might want to consider that the founders were not all naturalized citizens either. And only a small part of the continent was actually a part of the US in 1783.
red
That’s why they included the part after the first comma, they knew it would be at least 35 years before there could be any natural born citizens
******************
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
those men put their property, lives, and sacred honor (as the phrase goes) on the line in order to start this country. even so, they had to make allowances for those in the country at the time of its formation.
which they did.
once all those born prior to 1783 had died, that exception was no longer needed (tho never removed).
today, any wishing to run for POTUS must be a natural born US citizen if they wish to be Constitutionally eligible. for this to be true, such a person must have, at birth, no other citizenship possibilities.
this is why 0bama and cruz are not Constitutionally eligible.
Welcome to ObamaNet
Once the UN gets taxing authority, it becomes the de facto world government.
The Paris Global Warming Bull just might give that to them
All should be tried, convicted, and sentenced to hang as traitors.
Only one of Obama’s thousand cuts more to ensue before he’s out of office now is the most dangerous time.
bump :(
Obama no, Cruz yes. His mother was a birth citizen and did nor forfeit her US citizenship until after she birthed Ted in 1970. And she had not lived outside the US long enough to forfeit his eligibility.
I put the statement about time prior to the amending of the constitution in 1783 as a joke to indicate that there had been others due to naturalization that had been president. And the main founder I should have mentioned was Ben Franklin who was a French citizen.
But Obama was different. A whole lot of proof of his not being born to US mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, as no birth certificate could be produced for her efforts to instate Barrack Jr. to her passport and numbers are outside the constitutional time frame for his birth to qualify. Secondly, Barrack Jr. stated in an answer to the displaying of his Birth Cert that the certificate had been destroyed in a fire. Thirdly, both the long form and the short form suddenly appeared with the wrong name for the birthing hospital on it. Thirdly, his grandmother and her sister were present at his birth in Mombasa Kenya in August 1, 1961 and have repeatedly stated that.
So, we have incorrect documentation, witnesses, inability to provide information to update other federal documentation. Strike three, you’re out.
red
Remember this???
“Banned” US/China Commercial - media bias - Why Ron Paul?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeL9ov_yS18
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.