Article V ping!
I fear that it will take an even bigger national crisis before this starts getting traction.
BUMP!
Cucks and Never Trumpers desperate for relevancy. Too late, Levin! You had your chance, but put your own interests ahead of America's.
And once again Levin is spot on. Progressives are the problem, the lefties are easy to spot.
Sorry, Mike, but the term “Liberty Amendment” has already been taken.
In 1944, Willis E. Stone, an industrial engineer and polemicist proposed an amendment to the Constitution to abolish the federal income tax, which he dubbed the Liberty Amendment. By 1962, Stone was working full-time to pass this amendment as the chairman of the Liberty Amendment Committee of the USA. By 1982, when Stone retired, nine states had ratified the Liberty Amendment.
In article, is ‘overriding’ a judicial ruling the same as a veto? Or does it reverse the decision and form a precedent?
~~~
In Chapter Four, Levin would empower congress, upon three-fifths vote in the House and Senate, to override a majority opinion of the scotus. Likewise, so may the states, by three-fifths vote, override a majority opinion of the scotus. This power is wisely limited to twenty-four months after the date of the opinion. Knowing that the states and a newly federalized congress stand ready to look over their shoulders, the wild social justice predispositions of scotus are certain to subside.