Posted on 08/16/2016 12:20:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The largest hunger-fighting organization in the nation’s capital has put food-donating retailers on notice: no more candy, sugary sodas, or sheet cakes. As key as donations are to the nonprofit’s bottom line, the Capital Area Food Bank recently told retailers that, beginning this fall, it won’t accept free food that comes at a cost to recipients—many of whom struggle with obesity and diabetes as much as hunger.
At a time when 97 percent of households reporting food insecurity “cannot afford a balanced meal,” the organization’s effort is part of a larger national shift that acknowledges solving hunger isn’t always as simple as providing people with more calories.
“We are providing food on a regular basis to a low-income community, and we have a moral obligation that it be good food that’s not aggravating their (health) problems,” says Nancy Roman, CEO of the Capital Area Food Bank. Of the more than 500,000 people that receive food from the D.C. food bank, 22 percent have diabetes or live with someone who does.
A 2014 survey of food bank clients nationally found that 33 percent live with someone who has diabetes and 58 percent live with someone who has high blood pressure. While the nation’s 200 food banks were originally set up for food emergencies, recipients today visit them an average of eight times per year.
“We’re learning that there are more people who rely on us for sustenance on a regular basis,” says Ross Fraser, spokesman for Feeding America, a network of food banks that together distribute food through 60,000 partner organizations such as food pantries or churches. “If people are going to rely on a significant amount of their food coming from us, we had better be sure we’re not contributing to illnesses.”
Data Analysis Leads to Change
A two-year study conducted for Feeding America found that in addition to supplying the basis of a healthy diet, food pantries could help clients with diabetes improve their glycemic control (or eat more foods that balance out their sugar intake) by offering more whole, nutrient-rich foods.
After Roman joined the Capital Area Food Bank staff in 2013, the D.C. bank developed a system to analyze the nutrition of foods in the warehouse, prioritizing those that are low in salt and sugar and high in fiber. With the help of data, they were able to slowly increase the percentage of “core foods” that met the mark from 60 percent to 82 percent—foods like meat, dairy, vegetables, and whole grains—this past year. Then the progress plateaued.
“We realized we’d made as much progress as we can by buying produce, switching to whole grains, and working on nutrition education,” Roman says. “The rest was going to depend on our donors.”
That’s not to say all 18 percent of the foods that don’t meet the food bank’s nutrition goals are “junk.” Some might be foods like crackers that are fine to consume in moderation or with a spoonful of peanut butter. But there are still a handful of products that should have never made their way to a food bank, Roman says.
During a visit two summers ago, junk food abounded: Easter Peeps from March and packages of Hostess cupcakes nearing their expiration dates languished in a bin. That’s not to mention the reams of candy that pour in every year after Halloween, Christmas, and Valentine’s Day.
Donating high volumes of junk food “isn’t what the retailer intends in the first place,” Roman says. “This happens because people aren’t paying enough attention. But it’s our job to connect the dots.”
Retailers Respond
Roman says she’s been pleasantly surprised by the reaction from their retailer donors, who have been given early notice that the food bank will no longer accept candy, full-calorie soda, or cake as of September. Several of the 10 retail brands they work with (representing hundreds of stores) have already devoted staff time to ensuring unwanted goods don’t leave their doorstep.
Not sending the goods to the food bank might mean the retailers start ordering less candy for each season or they begin making donations to places that could use the sweets as a treat.
Over its 36-year relationship with the food bank, Giant Food already had taken steps to help it improve its offerings, Giant spokesman Jamie Miller says. Three years ago, Giant stores began freezing meat that was nearing its expiration date and donating what would otherwise have been thrown out to the food bank as part of a new “Meat the Needs” program.
The effort took extensive planning—donating and delivering frozen food is a lot harder than sending shelf-stable goods—but, in the end, it reduced a waste stream for the retailer while providing much needed protein to people who were food insecure.
Removing sugary foods from the donation stream will take additional effort, but Miller says Giant is up to the task. “We fully expect, by September 1, we’ll be removing those items the food bank won’t be accepting.”
The National Context
Nationally, Feeding America has a goal that 70 percent of what’s distributed by food banks be what the organization calls “foods to encourage,” such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Some food banks achieve this by seeking grants to buy more produce and creating most-wanted lists for food drives.
Individually, food banks also make their own nutrition commitments to better serve their audiences.
The Food Bank For New York City hasn’t accepted donations of sodas or candy for years and has had a nutritionist on staff since 1990, said spokeswoman Carol Schneider. And many California food banks are often loaded up with fresh, free produce that comes in the form of donations from both retailers and nearby farmers during harvest periods.
But replacing calorie-rich foods with nutrient-dense ones can be more of a struggle elsewhere, Ross says. He’s had food bank workers in some parts of the country, particularly in the Midwest, tell him they “don’t have the luxury of turning down food,” even if that means candy.
Saying no to junk food at the D.C. food bank—much like starting a new diet—won’t be as easy as flipping a switch, Roman says. There will be a transition period during which the food bank works with retailers and within its own budget to fill the void. She doesn’t want clients to think they can never have a treat, either, “but we can’t have that be the balance of our offerings.”
Lisa Barber, a 34-year-old mother of twins in Washington, D.C., says her family is making a similar transition, thanks in part to inspiration from her local food bank. Instead of feeding on snack foods this summer, she’s made BBQ turkey mini burgers and salads from the food bank’s recipe cards—which feature meals that can be made for four for under $6.
“I actually love the fact that they’re going to take less junk food,” Barber says of the food bank’s latest initiative. She started feeding her 6-year-old son and daughter less of it, too, after her daughter gained 10 pounds over the school year. Now, “I will continue to do it, because she and I have both lost weight.”
The twins are keen on the change, too. For their birthday party this month, Barber says, “We decided it was going to be less junk food and sugary treats.”
Her daughter plans to make fruit and vegetable kabobs, and her son requested a birthday cake made with applesauce and apples instead of sugar.
“I guess I’ll figure out how to make that,” she says.
I am poor and have used food the food banks a couple of times. from my experience only 20 percent are there like me because it is a emergency situation. most discover it when through bad planning they need it but then rather then pulling it together they start using it regularly because it is the easy fix
A relative has been FB posting her gardening in her backyard this summer, and is proud of her produce. Yesterday, she started selling her extras. I didn’t think she could do it, but she did. Seed in the ground by directions, water, and sunshine. She will make her money back, and she has lost weight.
Must be rough to be “needy” and also have to worry about obesity......I thought the doling out of food to the needy was to provide life-preserving calories first and hopefully nutrition as a side benefit....
Sadly, Obama is throwing these Muslims and Hispanics plus every Ted Kennedy charity case immigrant into cities it seems. I recall riding with my family in the mid 50’s from NJ to Kentucky, then to Texas and back through Florida before we went to Germany in 57-60. One of the things I recall the most was seeing homes out in the middle of no where off two lane state highways and these folks were black. Yes, they obviously did not have a luxury home, but; one could see children playing, others would be working and we’d see folks sitting on their porch. I seem to recall garden like fields next to or near these houses. Often late in the afternoon they’d sit on their porch and watch as we drove by. I still saw this in the 60’s when I drove in NC and GA, but; after 70 or so, I do not recall seeing black families out in the country in the south like before.
Thanks for the post. I think you pointed out the real problem. Once people get a hand out as opposed to short term help to get them back on their feet they seem to expect freebies or take them for granted. I see far too many folks living off gov programs. We have folks coming here for these hand outs.
Let that sink in. They aren't starving.
Had the same experience at an inner city " Soup Kitchen". The "Clients" were the unemployed obese, students and construction workers. Doing it for a year I never saw one person who I would consider even close to long term food deprived.
Worked on "Habitat for Humanity" projects and saw little if any sweat equity put into the project by the eventual beneficiaries. We have bred a whole class of people for whom personal responsibility is a foreign concept.
Herbs growing on the kitchen window sill in an apartment cuts down on having to purchase them. A few container plants on the balcony helps. Ever seen a wall of plants in the window and roof top gardens?
As for the candy donations not being accepted, there’s nothing wrong with sweets. Beggars can’t be choosers. They want my donation, they better accept what I give and say thank you. And I better not see it thrown in the garbage or I’ll tell everyone I see and their donations will take a nose dive.
They want to play the everything in moderation game then lets play. Over consumption of water will kill you. ‘Nuff said.
Don’t forget schools today serve ages 0-21 breakfast and lunch in the summer and they’ll bring it to your neighborhood so you won’t have to go all the way to school for it.
>I have to wonder why there is a need for food banks when people have food stamps.
Ummm, you have that in REVERSE.
Were we still a Land of the Free, there would ONLY *BE* food banks.
If they're that fat, why do they need free food?
What chaps my hide are the EBT signs at restaurants. I can’t afford to eat out but I’m required to foot the bill for them.
Notice, too, whenever the bleeding heart msm publishes pictures of their nearly empty kitchen cabinets, it’s all expensive national brands unlike mine that holds cheap store brands. They also have a lot of prepackaged items whereas this taxpayer must cook from scratch.
Example that I tell a lot is I can make 5 Scholtsky medium sandwiches with homemade buns for the price of 1 bought at the restaurant and no wasted gas going through the drive thru.
What’s a ribeye steak? I buy boneless beef ribs when they’re on sale for 2.97/lb and cook them like steak. Buy the limit and put the excess in the freezer. Each complete plateful with sides costs around $2 along with my time (which is a lot less time and gas than eating out). It may not be melt in your mouth kobe beef but I’d rather pay the utility bills.
And don’t even get me started on the price of pizza. Restaurant pizza prices are a joke. Even bigger jokes are those little packages of chips and cookies at convenience stores. For the price of a little bag of chips, the whole family and the neighbors could munch out with homemade chips.
Excuse me while I step off my soapbox.
The secretary at our local welfare office quit because her 40 hr/wk paycheck was less than what their clients were getting for zero hours of work.
And don’t even think about donating muffin stumps.
Exactly. They owe over one trillion in student loans and want those loans forgiven. Those who have paid theirs want refunds for merely paying back the loans.
Blacks seem to crowd up in “ghettos” in the towns & cities.
We live in the boonies, way out. There were a few blacks
out in this area for a while; but they moved elsewhere, &
NOT because anyone out here bothered them. We all keep to
ourselves out here.
Well, you do have a point.
In the ideal situation, people receiving handouts would be very aware of the fact that other people have to work harder and give to make those handouts possible. The government way of stealing from the workers to give to the non-workers removes any sense of responsibility to the receivers. They think of the handouts as a right.
I am quite familiar with the poverty culture, having grown up in it for a few years as a child.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.