Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Comey Didn’t Charge Hillary
http://tomohalloran.com/ ^ | August 5, 2016 | Veronica Coffin

Posted on 08/07/2016 12:32:31 AM PDT by V K Lee

Worth taking the time to read because this story is starting to leak out from FBI agents and others “who are in the know” inside the Washington beltway! The agents at the FBI are livid that Comey did what he did. They are claiming there was more than sufficient evidence to bring several indictments against Hillary Clinton. It wasn’t a slam dunk case, but it had more than a good probability of a conviction for Hillary Clinton.

Lynch and Obama made it clear to Comey that if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the Democrat nominee for president out of the election. If he failed to get a conviction he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election, to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison, and Obama and Lynch, as well as others, would see to it that he did.

Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for an indictment. Hillary’s statement to the FBI was intentionally given without a court reporter present or without any recording of her testimony to prevent her from having any further exposure to legal charges like perjury. If she lied to Congress, they have no written FBI deposition to confront Hillary with. This was set up to let her walk without fear of being charged with giving False Testimony or being charged with Obstruction of Justice. This is what those in the “legalese world” call a “Straw Man” legal charge. (It is a charge designed to make someone appear innocent of the charges!) EXAMPLE: Bill beats up Shirley at their home. Bill is arrested for “Felony Spousal Abuse” . Bill’s lawyer gets the charges dismissed because Bill is not married to Shirley! (They are only “live in boyfriend and girlfriend”.) Bill walks out of court totally exonerated of the charges thanks to a technicality! The twist in the case is the arresting officer knew all along Bill was not married to Shirley because the officer and Bill are old fraternity brothers. The officer intentionally charged Bill with something he knew would not stick. Bill would easily have been convicted of Assault and Battery, but he was not charged with that! This is what is known as the “STRAW MAN” charge. It is how you make a guilty person appear innocent.

This is exactly what was done with the Hillary Clinton case! If she had been charged with “Destruction of Government Documents”, she would have easily been convicted, because she admitted to doing this! Instead, she was charged with “Mishandling Classified Documents” which has wiggle room for reasonable doubt regarding Criminal Intent!

I think citizens are finally fed up with the Clintons and the cesspool of corruption that is our current government. Real Americans are ready to take our country back. All of these years of corruption have taken a toll on American lives. Citizens opinions of a lying White House, a corrupt Congress, the “pay to play” politicians, the legalese lawyers and lobbyists, big overspending “welfare mentality” government, the “looking for a loop hole” justice system, the lying media, and our censored educational system with an agenda to dumb down the next generation, is at the lowest point ever. Hillary is on the wrong side of every issue. The British Exit from the EU (Brexit) is just a small sign that real citizens of civilized nations are ready to take their country back. They are sick of the results of open borders and globalization led by power hungry elites.

Hillary Clinton has no character or integrity. She is an arrogant, condescending political elite who is only interested in lining the Clinton pockets with donations to the Clinton Foundation (wink, wink) from PACS, lobbyists, and foriegn nations that buy access and favors. The Clinton Foundation is nothing more than an operation used to launder money for the Clintons and other politicians involved in illegal activities. The Clintons are able to use the information of those participating to obtain cover for their activities, or blackmail those who are laundering money through them. Just count the number of politicians who arrive in Washington with nothing, but leave as millionaires and billionaires. Did their votes serve in the best interest of their constituents or did they only benefit themselves? If the representatives of your state fall in this category, then I suggest an investigation be launched.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Government
KEYWORDS: alqaedarico; benghazirico; clintonrico; comey; comeypresser; comeyrico; corruption; fbi; fbirico; hillary; hillarycomey; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryrico; hillarysemails; lynchrico; obamarico; soshillary; strawmancharge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: V K Lee

Comey ain’t no Eliot Ness!


21 posted on 08/07/2016 2:48:08 AM PDT by W. (Hillary is just like that ex-partner you've hated forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

Comey protect al Qaeda more than America. PERIOD.

Comey and Lynch belong in jail with their protector.


22 posted on 08/07/2016 3:07:59 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Further, Trump should press for charges of tampering with a Federal Presidential Election by Obama and Lynch, specifically to HIDE, OBSCURE and WHITEWASH criminal activity by a Presidential Candidate.


23 posted on 08/07/2016 3:13:35 AM PDT by Gaffer (Paint your face, gird yourself and stand with your backsides to the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

No she won’t win. Trump is going to win.

Vote Trump 2016


24 posted on 08/07/2016 3:18:26 AM PDT by TheStickman (Trump will be the 1st Pro America president since Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

More specifically, they DID interfere with an election. Just in favor of “their” side.


25 posted on 08/07/2016 3:21:17 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

Love to see a time line of Clinton foundation donations with trips Hilary took and legislation passed... I think it would be revealing


26 posted on 08/07/2016 3:23:19 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

I hope Trump wins but I believe the die is already cast. The republic is lost.


27 posted on 08/07/2016 3:24:08 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Gold and silver are real money, everything else is a derivative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Obama and Lynch should be jailed for this.

They should but they will skate.
Maybe another reason why Comey did what he did, is because he doesn't want his body to be discovered in Fort Marcy Park.

28 posted on 08/07/2016 3:37:42 AM PDT by Mark17 (The love of God, how rich and pure, how measureless and strong. It shall forevermore endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

The republic isn’t lost because I’m still breathing and so are a lot of people like me and you.

There really is no choice but to undermine her if she becomes president because the Iran deal will see nukes in CA, NY, Texas, Florida and any other large population area within four years.

She would have to be stopped. We’ll cross that bridge IF we get to it, but I think Donald is going to win.

Look at BRexit. You never know :)


29 posted on 08/07/2016 3:48:13 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MIA_eccl1212
And if it really looks like she won’t win... well then, all bets as to what kind of future they have in store for her... are off.

If I was Hillary, I'd be on the lookout for leaks about her health issues..........the more frequent and more revealing the closer to end times........buh bye beotch..........

30 posted on 08/07/2016 3:48:31 AM PDT by varon (There's always room for one more on the hanging tree.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee
Instead, she was charged with “Mishandling Classified Documents” which has wiggle room for reasonable doubt regarding Criminal Intent!

She was charged with something? When did that happen? I must have missed her indictment.

31 posted on 08/07/2016 3:54:25 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Ill go along with the scenario of WHAT happened.

The next question is WHY?

My working theory all along has been: to charge hildabeast with crimes she is guilty of would result in exposing crimes that two POTUS were also guilty of as co conspiritors:

Bubba - for foundation graft & bribes
Obammy - for benghazi, arming isis etc


32 posted on 08/07/2016 3:57:51 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher
This article is so bogus. As you posted:

Lynch and Obama made it clear to him that if Comey pressed for an indictment he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election....if an indictment failed.

But that was not Comey's job....... whether or not to indict is the job of the Attorney General. The failure to get a conviction is the prosecutors job.....ergo, Comey wouldn't be facing charges.

============================================

More likely, if true, Obama and Lynch would be facing charges....for threatening and intimidating a L/E officer and interfering and fixing a federal justice matter.

33 posted on 08/07/2016 4:01:04 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee
If he failed to get a conviction he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election, to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison, and Obama and Lynch, as well as others, would see to it that he did.

Certainly not. He would have immunity.

34 posted on 08/07/2016 4:02:17 AM PDT by Fhios (Progressives just don't know when to stop digging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheStickman

Elections are controlled NOT by those who vote (regardless of how many times), but rather by those who COUNT the votes.

We saw example after example of vote fraud in 2008 and in 2012. Those will pale when compared to the rampant fraud that will color this upcoming election.

If Her Thighness ‘wins’ this one, it’s the final nail in the coffin of what was once America. Time to water the tree of liberty? Perhaps, yes.


35 posted on 08/07/2016 4:06:11 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee
Hillary is working for Satan.

It is my opinion she will not face the consequences of her actions until she is thrown into the Lake of Fire.


36 posted on 08/07/2016 4:10:35 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

There is a reason that the Clinton people were never concerned in the least about any charges being brought. Let’s also not forget that Obama’s first political rally with Cankles was the same day that Comey announced his findings. There is not a chance in hell that he would have been at that rally if Comey was simultaneously recommending charges being brought.


37 posted on 08/07/2016 4:12:14 AM PDT by StevieRay20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
We have corruption at the highest levels, with the corrupt media joining establishment politicians at the deep end of the cess pool.

Exactly.

You would use the law to oppose socialism? But it is upon the law that socialism itself relies. Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help. - "The Law"; Bastiat

James Commie ALERT!

38 posted on 08/07/2016 4:13:39 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thinden
As I read all of this, and think about the reality of who she is, it is a sad commentary on the lack of ethics in the American public as well as in our politicians. This woman's husband had a physical relationship with an intern in the White House, in a pantry next to the Oval Office, and then lied to the world on internationally broadcast television without flinching. She enabled this, and similar activities. Before people knew who she was, she was labeled a compulsive liar by the democrat in charge of the Watergate investigation. She has been involved in scandal after scandal (Whitewater, Filegate, Travelgate, questionable commodities trading, Pay to Play with the Clinton Foundation, and the recent private email server/national security scandal, just to start), and there are so many chronicled instances of her blatantly lying such that one could write a book. Still, the resentful, hateful, and entitled on the left vote for her, and she has supporters in the American public. Those who do so either don't care about right and wrong, or they are ignorant of the facts. The later would be sad, but at least somewhat understandable. The former, however, IMHO is the biggest reason they do so. Those driven by resentment, hatred, and self-interest don't care what she did or does, as long as she ‘sticks it to’ those they want her to stick it to, and/or that she gives them stuff.
39 posted on 08/07/2016 4:21:12 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee
It wasn’t a slam dunk case, but it had more than a good probability of a conviction for Hillary Clinton.

If true, there's the reason right there. "When you strike at a king, you must kill him." If Comey wasn't absolutely certain of convicting Hillary, he wasn't going to try.

40 posted on 08/07/2016 4:21:58 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson