Posted on 07/28/2016 2:11:37 PM PDT by ctpsb
The Suffolk University poll showed Clinton with a 9-point lead over Trump in the Keystone State as the Democratic National Convention takes place in Philadelphia. When Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein are included, Clinton's lead remains 9 points.
(Excerpt) Read more at aol.com ...
Hope Pennsylvania's not going democrat again.
They only polled 500 people. A very small sample.
Live by the polls, die by the polls!!
Still, almost 100% of respondents (97.6%) say they are going to vote.
Philly has over 100% turnout, New Black Panthers stand at polls with clubs and weapons and nothing, nothing happens.
How can the Democrats not win in PA?
Suffolk is in the heart of Communist Boston. Fuhgeddaboutit.
They asked for the youngest member of the household.
Suffolk polls are garbage. Shows McGinty with a wide lead over Sen. Toomey. Doesn’t jibe with reality.
They are using this so that it when they do an "average" it maintains the horse race so dollars will be spend on ads and marketing.
You'll forget about it in a day or two, but it will remain in the average trend for weeks. It's just how the long con works.
internals are flaky. sample d+9. moderates +15 over conservative. Should be close +/- 1 or 2 Blacks also oversampled 13% s/b about 10%. sample was bad.
During the 2012 election, Suffolk stopped polling Virginia in mid October because they said that Romney was going to win the state. Obama won by 5%. That should tell you all you need to know about Suffolk.
Pay no attention to this poll. Keep your eye out for the Battleground counties poll. Last one had Luzerne County going to Trump by 23. Then go back and look at the 2012 and 2008 elections in PA. The Luzerne results are almost identical to the state results. This is just more gaslighting by the media.
Looks to be more of a push poll due to the methodology. Will call it an outlier.
That could be 35.
YOUNGEST? why? they’re 80 20 for dems.
We can win without PA. But of course would like to take it.
I used to say I was definitely voting when I was younger. I didn’t. Hard to trust kids.
And I’ve been doing YouGov polls and of course answering the questions as a conservative would.
Stopped getting polls from them. Probbly just a coincidence. Still odd.
Again? Pennsylvania hasn't been a red state since 1988.
It’s the liberal pollster Suffolk that is suspect.
Forget the number polled:
1) it’s +4 D over 2012 (does ANYONE think Cankles will do as well as Zero in PA?)
2) it’s +3 black (10% of pop vs 13% polled)
3) here is the kicker: like the ABC poll last week it asked for the “youngest voter in the home” (I.e., the LEAST likely voter).
4) This poll was off by 3 in its 2012 final-—but I guarantee they weren’t using a goofy “youngest voter” sample then.
The point is that a truly random sample would have a random number generator with ages generated according to their frequency in the population and ask for people with the age closest to the random number thus generated with each call.
Report last week that Trump way up in Ottawa Co. OH-—but no numbers. Heard anything?
The good news is that those who are involved in the coal industry will go Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.