Intention is the most important factor in lethality. Consider the Orlando massacre. The intention to kill could not have been clearer. The shooter achieved near 50% lethality.
1 posted on
06/17/2016 11:43:38 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
When I go to the range, my intention is to place every round in the Bulls-eye; thus where the lead actually goes really doesn’t matter - right?
2 posted on
06/17/2016 11:46:33 AM PDT by
Hodar
(A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
To: marktwain
As we keep saying:
SHOT PLACEMENT MATTERS
3 posted on
06/17/2016 11:52:18 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
To: marktwain
These numbers are bogus. With exploding rounds from a gun that feels like a bazooka and sounds like a cannon, the lethality has to be near 100%. /s
4 posted on
06/17/2016 11:54:24 AM PDT by
pas
To: marktwain
6 posted on
06/17/2016 12:05:39 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
("We can't fix a rigged system by relying on the people who rigged it." --Donald Trump, 6/7/16)
To: marktwain
7 posted on
06/17/2016 12:10:37 PM PDT by
ZULU
(Donald Trump is the biggest threat to the New World Order since Barry Goldwater)
To: marktwain
Homicide/Assault is most likely a single shooter firing a few shots. Legal intervention can be four LEO emptying five 17 round mags. So yes, legal intervention is more lethal, for sure.
11 posted on
06/17/2016 12:29:38 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: marktwain
How convenient of them to label “legal intervention” as only encompassing law enforcement. The numerous gun owners who have helped avert a crisis are conveniently ignored in this “study”.
12 posted on
06/17/2016 1:02:21 PM PDT by
Objective Scrutator
(All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson