In reading the article, it appears that Moore is taking a reasonable position that any liberty-loving Constitutionalist would support. Perhaps it is difficult for some to see that if we empower the government to say “you can’t build a mosque in this location because it is a mosque” then ultimately we will empower that same government to zone and regulate Christian churches out of existence too.
As another example, I would object to and oppose the actions of a government that tried to force a Muslim or Jewish restaurateur to cater a KKK rally and serve bacon cheeseburgers just as much as I object to government forcing Christian bakers or photographers to participate in same-sex weddings.
“Perhaps it is difficult for some to see that if we empower the government to say “you can’t build a mosque in this location because it is a mosque”...”
We’re not saying that though. We’re saying “you can’t build a mosque because mosques give aid and comfort to our enemies”.
all we really want is to STOP importing the 3rd world.