Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2016 6:39:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is only one logical answer to this question. Prepare a ship immediately for our Dear Leader to ride in. He will find the answer in short order.


2 posted on 05/22/2016 6:44:39 PM PDT by oldasrocks (They should lock all of you up and only let out us properly medicated people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

My bet that it’s a binary star system with one of the stars being a captured black hole. That explains the data quite easily.


3 posted on 05/22/2016 6:48:52 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If they live there, are they still considered aliens?


6 posted on 05/22/2016 6:53:22 PM PDT by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
'Astronomer Jason Wright pointed out that the light patterns are consistent with what we'd expect if aliens had built a Dyson swarm of solar collectors around the star to harness its energy.'

Yeah, the Jenolen found out about it the hard way..............


7 posted on 05/22/2016 6:54:32 PM PDT by Viking2002 (The Avatar is back by popular request.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is a silly article.

They use Jupiter as some sort of argument against very large planets.

We have what, 9 in our solar system. Just nine. Jupiter is the largest here. That is not a statistically valid sample size at all.

The start has a very large planet orbiting it. Simple answer. Very, very big.


8 posted on 05/22/2016 7:02:03 PM PDT by cba123 (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Alien City 15 Alpha by Rederager
9 posted on 05/22/2016 7:02:53 PM PDT by ETL (You can lead a Trump supporter to critical facts & info, but you can't make him/her think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

These folks know so little about the universe outside of our solar system - their speculation is kind of futile.


10 posted on 05/22/2016 7:07:29 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Time to settle this mystery once and for all ... We need someone smart enough and brave enough to travel there and get us the answers!


12 posted on 05/22/2016 7:10:37 PM PDT by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

18 posted on 05/22/2016 7:25:08 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve read they’ve ruled out natural causes that could interfere with the star’s output, but how did they manage that? For instance, what if the star were 30% or 40% iron from the get go (don’t ask me how)? That would surely wreck havoc on the nuclear fires at the core, perhaps causing wild fluctuations in the output. And that’s only one possibility, I imagine. How could they rule out all such possibilities when we admittedly know so little about the wonders that are out there? To invoke aliens at this point is nutso, imo.


27 posted on 05/22/2016 8:22:53 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Pak Protectors are building something good.


28 posted on 05/22/2016 8:37:52 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The truth is it’s not even a star. It’s a lightbulb. When we look out at space, we’re really looking at a painted ceiling.


42 posted on 05/22/2016 10:27:21 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I say it is a fluorescent star, and it’s flickering at a very low rate.

By the way, fluorescent bulbs suck.


44 posted on 05/22/2016 10:48:30 PM PDT by Vision Thing (Vote Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Would not a star in orbit near a black hole (or other high gravity object) periodic dim in light radiating towards us ?

as the star move relatively closer or farther to black hole from our perspective... more or less light radiation would be captured by the black hole

you do not have to move behind something have light block

gravity itself can grab and hold light radiation


45 posted on 05/23/2016 8:05:15 AM PDT by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

During a recent observation of KIC 8462852, astronomers at Vanderbilt University were startled when it appeared the distant star had gone completely dark.....until they realized they had forgotten to remove the lens cap from their telescope.


46 posted on 05/23/2016 8:17:06 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson