Posted on 04/16/2016 7:10:52 AM PDT by bray
"Thank you sir, may I have another?"
That's what you all seem to be saying - "Just give us a winner, we don't care if he turns out like Obozo, just build a wall, baby - that's ALL we want....
(PS - he's not gonna' build a wall, and you know it)
He admitted to making a mistake and made it right. He was not charge with anything illegal nor should he have been. The only thing suspect about it is in the head of trump supporters!!!
The Obie supporters got a lot of what was promised...the only problem is; it's a bunch of crap.
Oh! That’s choice...a Trump supporter lecturing about insults!!!
Weird statement.
It was a bizarre vanity
A bit incoherent but thanks for trying. C+.
C+....seems a little high to me!!!
The less transparent and forthcoming Cruz is, the more his supporters like it.
And yet it’s Trump who hasn’t released his tax forms!!!
Please go on record, and I’ll accept what you say; how much has Trump or any organization associated with Trump paid you?
Donald Trump was in his 20s when he branched into the Manhattan real estate market where his father had never competed with the big names in NYC real estate.
He quietly convinced government to let this young new to the market real estate developer build the Jacob Javits convention center in lower Manhattan. His first gig in the big city. The rest is history as the storied Manhattan skyline was transformed by that brash, young real estate developer.
And I’m sure you got this gloss piece from his book!!!
Exactly. We have a president who could fill stadiums...and look where that got us. 8 years later we are deep into debt, the world is losing to radical Islam and Obama has indeed fundamentally changed America so much that we have little hope left.
Ted is conservative. Trump is not. Are we really going to sell out our White House to another populist demigod?
Facts only annoy them!!!
As I said, Cruz supporters appear more anti-Trump than pro-Cruz. The details of Cruz’ 2012 remain concealed. Cruz ssupporters’ response:
Trump!
Just admit you like it when Cruz tells the FEC to pound sand. Admit you prefer stonewalling to transparency. You’ll find the honesty refreshing.
Btw, the FEC has an official interest in learning the details of Cruz’ loans. Please cite the government agency that has officially requested info re Trump’s tax returns, and which he flatly rebuffed.
That's right, we want a winner. The Dems have won the popular vote five out of the last six elections. If the Reps don't win the WH in 2016, they will never win it for a very long time. Demography is destiny. The Dems are on the cusp of being the permanent majority party fueled by mass immigration and minority birthrates.
By 2019 half of the children 18 and under will be minorities. Each cohort that turns 18 annually will be more Dem than the previous one. Minorities and immigrants vote more than two to one Dem. Unless the GOP starts doing something to penetrate the traditional Dem constituencies, it will continue to lose elections.
Jeff Sessions provided the blueprint for victory two years ago, Becoming the Party of Work--How the GOP can help struggling Americans, and itself. Only Trump seems to be following it:
According to a new Washington Post/ABC News poll, seven in ten voters believe that the Republican party is “out of touch with the concerns of most people in the United States today.”
What follows is a plan for how the GOP can win back their trust — and a build a conservative majority in the process.
But first, a little history.
When Americans went to the polls in 2012, the following was true: Work-force participation had sunk to its lowest level in 35 years, wages had fallen below 1999 levels, and 47 million Americans were on food stamps. Yet Mitt Romney, the challenger to the incumbent president, lost lower- and middle-income voters by an astonishing margin. Among voters earning $30,000 to $50,000, he trailed by 15 points, and among voters earning under $30,000 he trailed by 28 points.
And what did the GOP’s brilliant consultant class conclude from this resounding defeat? They declared that the GOP must embrace amnesty. The Republican National Committee dutifully issued a report calling for a “comprehensive immigration reform” that would inevitably increase the flow of low-skilled immigration, reducing the wages and living standards of the very voters whose trust the GOP had lost.
Over the past four decades, as factories were shuttered and blue-collar jobs were outsourced or automated, net immigration quadrupled. Yet the corporate-consultant class has pronounced that an insufficient level of immigration is the problem. A more colossal misreading of the political moment has rarely occurred.
Perhaps the most important political development now unfolding in the U.S. is the public’s growing loss of faith in our political and financial elites of both parties. To open the ears of disaffected voters, the GOP must break publicly from the elite immigration consensus of Wall Street and Davos. Republicans have a clear path to building a conservative majority if they free themselves from the corporate consultants and demonstrate to the American public that the GOP is the only party aligned with the core interests, concerns, and beliefs of everyday hardworking citizens.
But the immigration “principles” offered by House GOP leaders imply that record immigration levels must be increased further to meet “the needs of employers.” One such GOP proposal — to provide the food industry with half a million low-skilled workers each year — was polled by Rasmussen. Nearly 70 percent of independent voters opposed it.
“Most business leaders have long favored more open immigration. Different businesses want different kinds of people,” a prominent GOP fundraiser declared on TV. “A restaurant may want waiters and cooks; a hospital wants nurses and doctors; a university wants physicists; a business like Exelon needs more engineers.” Asked by the interviewer about hiring U.S. workers for open jobs, he replied that many of those now unemployed are “unable to compete for them.”
Is that the message of a winning party? It might win a majority of votes at a dinner party in a gated community in Bel Air, but it is an act of profound delusion to think that plan can form the basis of a nationwide Republican resurgence.
Democrats in Washington have already cast their lot. A recent report from the Center for Immigration Studies shows that all net employment gains from 2000 to 2013 — a period of record legal immigration — went to immigrant workers, and yet the immigration plan championed by the White House and congressional Democrats would triple the number of immigrants given permanent legal status over the next decade, and it would double the annual flow of guest workers to compete for jobs in every sector of the U.S. economy. The Democrats’ plan delivers for international corporations, open-borders groups, and even workers now living in other countries — all at the expense of American workers.
So Republicans have a choice. They can either join the Democrats as the second political party in Washington advocating uncontrolled immigration, or they can offer the public a principled alternative and represent the American workers Democrats have jettisoned. Republicans can either help the White House enact an immigration plan that will hollow out the American middle class, or they can finally expose the truth about the White House plan and detail the enormous harm it will inflict.
Republicans could then illustrate how, on every policy front, the Left embraces an agenda that benefits only the fortunate few. Their agenda includes: energy restrictions that destroy jobs and drive up costs; maze-like administrative rules that only the largest companies can navigate; nationalized health care that shrinks the work force; Federal Reserve stimulus, which helps big firms at the expense of small savers; taxes and regulation that close plants and send work overseas; massive spending that makes Washington a boomtown while impoverishing the nation; bureaucratic interference in schools and homes; intrusive government; a surging welfare state; endless deficits; and an increasingly open-borders immigration plan. Each of these policies directly harms working Americans. Each of these policies serves the political interests of Democrats while entailing lower pay, fewer hours, and higher unemployment for dedicated American workers.
Trump is winning the demographic of those earning less than $30,000. He is appealing to the workers and showing how immigration is hurting American workers whether it is jobs, wages, or crime.
(PS - he's not gonna' build a wall, and you know it)
As someone who has worked on the immigration for over nine years and lobbied on the Hill, Trump is the only candidate who will build the wall. Cruz will never do it despite his recent conversion. The fact that Jeff Sessions endorsed Trump and that Steve Miller transferred from Sessions' staff to the Trump campaign should tell you something. I see tremendous inroads into the Dem constituencies due to immigration and trade.
And what is the urgency? Romney didn't release his until September 2012?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.