She is articulate, fast on her her feet in answering questions, and can debate more than adequately. Plus, her strength is with economic issues, which are very important.
Yes, I'd call her ideologically a RINO moderate, but then remember that Reagan won two elections decisively with RINO moderate George H. W. Bush as his running mate.
Then there is this business of the woman factor, the thought being that a female GOP VP candidate will work to the party's advantage vs. The Witch.
Fiorina sucks!
Should the RNC descend to the bottom and actually allow Cruz the nomination.... no one I know cares who he shares his ticket with.
Cruz is already joined with, indebted to, and owned by the Washington Cartel now. That *is* his ticket. They will inform him who his VP may be.
Who votes for that combination, in November? And, who cares what the name is for his globalist VP?
The GOPE has decided on Hillary, not Ted’s ticket. It’s all theater for the Cruz flock of geese.
When you listen to Fiorina talk, she sounds like a Democrat. She pulls the “female” card routine often, and that is very off-putting.
If someone has experience and qualifications, I’ll listen to them. I know Fiorina has experience and qualifications, but I am not convinced she has been as successful and polished as she tries to make people believe.
When you add the gender pandering to the mix, she is very annoying for me to listen to. She also tries to talk with authority, but with her record I don’t think she has earned it. Her record is no where near as wonderful as she would want me to believe, and speaking with authority as she does comes off more as her being above everyone, which I don’t buy into at all either.
I think folks who like her have kind of turned off their radar when they listen. If they watch for the gender specific references, listen to her as she makes her presentations, they’ll notice a person hard at work using the PC phraseology of a Leftist.
When she jumped in to run interference for Ted in the sex scandal from the National Enquirer, she more or less tried to shame the reporter into not asking his questions. She didn’t make any denials on Ted’s behalf (as I recall, I may be wrong on that).
It was a very Leftist tactic to use, to deflect. I wasn’t particularly impressed.
These things to me, are big warning signs. I wouldn’t go anywhere near her.
Here’s something else very important to think about.
Reagan got as much done as he could during his administration. Then he handed off to the RNC/GOPe/Globalist’s Bush.
Bush from day one started to unravel Reagan’s America.
Here’s just one example. Reagan reluctantly signed off on amnesty for illegal aliens. He did so as part of a plan to get more strict laws and regulations on the books. Employers were charged with making sure they didn’t hire illegals, under penalty of law.
George Bush refused to implement this. He allowed to border to remain porous, against the regulations signed by Reagan into law.
Inland enforcement was cut back.
This was the sort of thing Bush did with Reagan policy.
Today Reagan gets blamed for the immigration mess. No, it was his idiot-stick vice-president that should get the blame. He set the post Reagan standard, and Clinton, Bush, and Obama followed on with it, making it even worse.
I suspect we’d be shocked to see how many policies mirrored this. For one, the military has languished post Reagan.
On and on it goes.
So it is very important we find a person that can follow on Trump, keep his policies moving forward, and add to them to make this nation even greater than great again. “:^)
Sounds funny, but there’s a lot of meat on them thar bones.
Fiorina IS NOT that person.
Yes, and look where that got us. Pappy Bush ruined the 3rd term Reagan Conservative mandate and ushered in the Democrat Presidential dominance era post-1992 for which only one GOP nominee has won a majority of the popular vote in a 28-year span (2004). RINOs are a disaster for us, and they are the last persons we should ever consider for either President or VP.
Yes. But please Do however recall that many v p’s go on to become presidents. Including your mr bush
My first choice would be Scott Walker. Conservative leader, qualified. Unlike Ryan he would likely deliver WI (we need FL, VA, OH and at least one more state, WI would do).
I could live with Fifi, really I wouldn’t have a problem with her, I don’t think she’s so bad, she doesn’t have a record in office so we can’t really be sure, that’s why I prefer candidates with records in office. She’d probably do great in the debate with Julian Castro or whatever piece of crap Hilly picks for her running mate. The reaction here at FR would be overwhelmingly negative though, I don’t even wanna read the comments in this thread.
Really the main reason to consider her is cause she is a she, Carl Fiornia would not be on the list. I don’t know if that’s a good enough reason. Female VP nominees are 0-2. The “girl power” crowd will be voting Hillary regardless. She would be attacked over her business record, which plenty of conservatives have attacked her over, Hillary could just run ads about what Trump said about her, that may violate “first do no harm”.
I think she’d make a good US Trade Rep or Commerce Sec. or something like that.
Fiorina would be good, and she’s quick on her feet, including the pro-life issue. But I do wish she did not have exceptions to abortion, as it’s still a baby, just as innocent and beautiful as all babies.
Hopefully she’s changed her mind, and is now 100% pro-life, like Ted Cruz.
Cruz received an endorsement from National Right-to-Life because he is 100% pro-life, they said.
When Carly was running for office in CA, pro-aborts said that Carly was just pretending to be for exceptions for political reasons. I hope that’s it.