Posted on 04/06/2016 5:57:26 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Ya don't say...
If you’d spent the last year listening to only left-wing journalists, you’d have a pretty rosy picture of Hillary Clinton. Sure, there’s some concern about her status as a throwback candidate, and there’s an occasional acknowledgment of her scandals, but the criticism is fleeting. She is the rightful heir to the presidency, and any concerns are trivialities - most of them are cooked up by Republicans, and they’re easily addressed.
Under the surface, however, lurked Hillary’s “trust” numbers. Depending on which sycophant was talking, the idea that Hillary was untrustworthy was either A: Nonexistent, B: Overblown, or C: A tiny hurdle that would be easily overcome.
Bernie could have done her in 2 months ago if he wasn’t a-scared to go negative about the candidate with the most negatives in US electoral history
i don’t anyone near my candidac, let alone damaging it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.