Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY I BACK TRUMP....an opinion piece...
My own Analysis | 3/10/2016 | Rustybucket

Posted on 03/11/2016 11:39:08 AM PST by Rustybucket

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Rustybucket

“That is my worry.”

Mine, too, FRiend. Mine too.


41 posted on 03/11/2016 3:06:10 PM PST by jessduntno ("Where the Hell do you put the bayonet?" - Gen. "Chesty" Puller, at a flamethrower demonstration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Echo4C

I stated the first paragraph but do not know where the “IS at odds with this” statement, I re-read my post and did not see it. Could you please show me?

In fact, I like his knowledge, and part of that knowledge is his “flexibility”, It is necessary to work with both sides of the isle and get things done. I did say that Ted Cruz is Inflexible which is legendary in Washington, which is to say that he is a strict constitutionalist, and is why I said he would be great for SCOTUS.

IMO, bills laden with pork is what a non-businessman does to capitulate to get things accomplished. I believe that Trump has the experience to get around these traps. I don’t think the others know how, or are willing to do so.

Saying that it is how things get done in Washington is precisely why we need to see another way of getting things done.

I have long held that Line Item Veto’s would be a way to eliminate pork. I also said that negotiating would happen before the bill was written.

Remember a bill has to be voted on if an item is changed in a bill, so he can veto parts of a bill and send it back for approval rather than cancelling an otherwise good bill.


42 posted on 03/11/2016 3:14:14 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

I don’t believe that I commented on this issue.


43 posted on 03/11/2016 3:15:38 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Stegall Tx

Are you asking a question?


44 posted on 03/11/2016 3:16:28 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NIKK

Thanks Nikk


45 posted on 03/11/2016 3:17:11 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lucky american

I respect your opinion.

I see, and have seen Trump attacked viciously by his opponents, sometimes like pack wolves. I see the Main Stream Media attack him, and in debates center their attack with leading questions and toss soft ball questions to others, while ignoring those who don’t raise a ruckus.
Trump plays the media like a violin. Those who go to his rally’s or listen to them on YouTube or read about them, don’t get the 10 second sound bytes the rest of the voting public hear as they are busy or uninterested.
Like I have answered already, do some investigation on your own, read about the man. Explore what he has accomplished, see who he helps, and just as importantly who he does not.
If you still feel the same way, I wish you the best of luck.


46 posted on 03/11/2016 3:24:18 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rustybucket

I think you’re confused, re-read what I wrote.

The things in italics are quotes from two different posts of yours - the plain text is what I wrote (i.e. “is at odds with” was a segue between two quotes of yours - one that supported Trump for being inflexible and one that attacked Cruz for being inflexible).

Furthermore, I did not say that’s the way things get done in DC - I said that’s how deals are made. What else does Trump have to deal for other than pork? That’s all most legislators care about - it’s what helps them get re-elected.

If he wants his wall passed, or his Muslim ban, or any other of his superlative ideas, he has to have bargaining chips. If he takes pork out of the equation, he’s not negotiating from a position of strength.


47 posted on 03/11/2016 3:30:10 PM PST by Echo4C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Peter ODonnell

The bigger problem in this policy is finding the millions of illegals and deporting them. This will partly reduce the flow of new illegals, who’s going to want to risk paying smugglers if they figure on being deported within three months anyway?

/===/

A question asked previously, but not in this thread. As I recall the answer was that removing the benefits would render them without
Medical
Dental
Housing
Schooling
Family Aid
And a host of other benefits that draw them to this country illegally.
Once that stops, they won’t be able to survive here and will voluntarily leave.
Also, I have always wondered why ICE was not there in force and with paddy wagons when illegal aliens had a protest?? WTF, they show up in droves. Round em all up, collect their families and BOOM mass deportation. But that is just My Opinion.


48 posted on 03/11/2016 3:34:25 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Filthy Low info, inbred Southerners are to blame for Trump...I despise those stupid bastards.


49 posted on 03/11/2016 3:44:35 PM PST by chasio649 (Southerner, low info and inbred...miss anything?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Echo4C

I think your heart may be in the right place but its not relevant to this thread. If you want to send a link to where you said that I said something. Please do so. Otherwise it only muddies the water in this thread. Fair? Thanks.

Trump has said in books and in person that he surrounds himself with the smartest people he can find. If he doesn’t know something, he gets the smartest people to inform him and advise him. That is smart business.

I have always object to the term “Muslim Ban”, what he has clearly said over and over, is that he advocates a TEMPORARY ban until we get things figured out. That is a democratic chant. Shame on you. Negotiating beforehand is the position of strength. Trading one for the other is a Political Trick. Experience says that you go in with more than what you want and use the excess to negotiate with, you don’t add to the bill to get it passed...IMO...but, Hey, I am not Donald Trump, and he has been doing this successfully for his entire career. Can you say the same?


50 posted on 03/11/2016 3:53:03 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Rustybucket

Those are quotes of yours in THIS thread - there’s no link necessary. Unless you simply refuse to read what you’ve already written here.

You also seem to have some false concept of how negotiations happen. When two people negotiate, they both generally concede something to come to some agreement. If Trump says he wants a wall, what is he going to give the other side to get what he wants? More liberalism? Pork? What is his bargaining chip?

I don’t care if Trump surrounds himself with the “smartest” people if those people are liberal. Given his proclivity for lashing out at anyone who criticizes him, Trump clearly surrounds himself with yes-men, not people of principle. That is a scary proposition for a president. Do you want him implementing liberalism in the name of conservatism?


51 posted on 03/11/2016 4:03:46 PM PST by Echo4C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Echo4C

Please, quit obfuscating, if I said it somewhere in this thread, you know where it is, tell me which post it is. I want to know context, what was said before and after, etc.

I do not pretend to be running for the president, nor should you. In personal context, I can dicker with the best of them, that does not mean that I have the knowledge or skills to negotiate with people on an international scale, nor have I ever said I could.

There have been probably millions of words dedicated to how Trump could accomplish this wall, and many from people with far more knowledge and experience that you or myself. I said, read, educate yourself. It is not my place to educate you. It seems to me you already have preconceived notions about what he is going to do, with stating what he says he is going to do. Regardless, I did not cover any of it in what I wrote on this thread. However, I did cover it on another thread in the past day or two. And I stand by what I said. Do a search and read what I wrote, if you disagree, post it on that thread and I will answer it there.

Your last paragraph, forgive me, is laughable. To presume that any intelligent businessman eliminates knowledge based information on whether someone is a liberal or not is ignorant. Dictators surround themselves with yes men, not successful businessmen. They depend on honest dissenters who can prove their point. Like I said, he is not a politician, he is a businessman, very similar, but not the same. I think it is unwise to try to paint them with the same brush.


52 posted on 03/11/2016 4:19:46 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Rustybucket

Never mind, you’re a perfect Trumpfan. Congrats.


53 posted on 03/11/2016 4:25:14 PM PST by Echo4C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Echo4C

Oh I am a Trump Fan, and thanks, you are a pot stirrer. I your not interested in being specific, that’s on you. Have a nice day.


54 posted on 03/11/2016 4:26:42 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Echo4C

For grins I did a word search on the thread. It was from Post #5, and was clearly a comment on Ted Cruz. Like I said, A pot Stirrer.


55 posted on 03/11/2016 7:17:10 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Rustybucket
IMO, fixing America will be ALL about the business of doing it right, that will involve watching costs, negotiating for the right business model, and delivering on time.

The "business model" Trump supports is the same as the Clintons' and Obama: endless demagoguery and the worst kind of smearing of anyone who dares question their actions. Trump makes Obama's defamation campaign against "Joe the Plumber" seem like child's play. Even Ben Carson admits that the public Trump is a BIG FAT PHONY.

56 posted on 03/12/2016 12:17:18 AM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ravinson

I would like to post a long explanation, but with this statement of yours, it would be a waste of time.
YOUR JUST PLAIN WRONG...IMO


57 posted on 03/12/2016 6:28:04 AM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson