Ted Cruz responds to question about Heidi's membership on CFR. ...video at link.
In the Freedom Outpost article (March 2015) Garrison rightly asks us to put all biases aside, including Broze’s words about coaching and asks do “you think Ted’s explanation is sufficient.”
I Do.
‘Worked’.
Past tense.
But she’s still there, just on leave.
Does she still have the ID badge or not?
Cruz/Heidi would be Bush III
Pray America wakes
More lies from the Cruz camp? It was widely reported at the time that she took an unpaid leave of absence from Goldman. She didn't resign.
They must think we have a really short attention span.
And his defense of US sovereignty in court, against the UN, and against the Bush administration proves that this is his point of view.
Interesting, the SC case I referenced in the earlier thread in this article. Only Trump supporters believe the CFR stuff.
The attacks against Heidi Cruz originated during Ted Cruz successful run for the US Senate in 2012.
His victory in the Primary was considered a monumental upset.
Why?
Because he defied the party establishment to “wait his turn,” and ran against their anointed candidate, Lt. Governor David Dewhurst who had been selected by the GOPe to replace Kay Baily Hutchison.
Cruz went against the establishment and won in the primary and then the general election for the seat.
During the Primaries, Dewhurst tried every way he could think of to attack Ted Cruz, including going after his wife.
Dewhurst himself leaned towards GOP establishment globalist interests, so it was odd that he would attack Mrs. Cruz the way he did.
She had been invited to sit on a large panel at the CFR to reviewed a 2005 paper entitled, “Building a North American Community,” by Robert Pastor. To this day a number of people point to this paper as the initial proposal and idea for a “North American Union.” But the author himself has repeatedly denied that it had anything to do with the creation of such an organization.
According to the author, the paper called for mild international cooperation in North America on economic issues with no formal structure at all.
Heidi Cruz’s only identifiable contribution to the review consisted of a single paragraph in the appendix which says,
“We must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us — truly the measure of our success. As such, investment fund sand financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants.”
Her contribution was to point out that the Free Market and private sector were absolutely necessary components for economic solutions.
That’s it.
No call for a NAU.
No call for “no borders.”
All of that is a fabrication by a GOP establishment candidate at the time who was attempting to smear Ted Cruz...and it is being picked up now for the same reasons.
The people of Texas did not buy it then, apparently they did not buy it on March 1st...I did not buy it this morning when I cast my vote in the GOP Primary here in Idaho.
Now, as I have said, and for the ample reasons I have pointed out, should Donald Trump become the nominee...I will support him 100% against Clinton or sanders.
I hope and trust all GOP voters will do the same.
Dick Cheney is/was also a member of the CFR. I don't consider him liberal or hated.
CFR I see as the child of the Fabian Society. Sad to hear that one of my heroes, Jon Bolton was part of CFR. The CFR seeks to usurp US sovereignty so I’m not sure what I think of Ted’s explanation.