“You poor soul. The poster has answered you in prior posts that He says he has not read any books on the SI, and even explained why that is not the issue!”
That is not true. What he has said is that reading books on the subject hasn’t mattered. He may have made one comment about not having read an entire book. My questions are, however, are pertinent, and since a question (which was not at all pertinent) was put to me and I was attacked for not answering it, and an apology was was made contingent to it (which is ridiculous) I decided to oppose that clear hypocrisy.
“But you are so focused upon your needy ego and last wording and being seen as always right that you apparently cannot see the answer!”
Again, I have read everything posted. And the point is, if he answered my question, then I answered his. Only my question was directly pertinent. His wasn’t. How someone feels about an issue is meaningless in a debate about an issue. What someone KNOWS about an issue is ALWAYS pertinent in a debate on an issue.
“{Pitiful, vlad, just sadly pitiful. Therapy might be able to help you with that fixation problem though ...”
I am fixated - on the TRUTH. I don’t think you’re familiar with Him or it.
BTW, vlad, I know Him well enough to know He needs no mediatrix and is not being eaten at Catholic altars. God has given to us His Word, and therein I find all that one needs to be born from above and live in a relationship with The Soter. It must be nearly impossible for a catholic to believe God does not need nor does He correspond with a magicsteeringthem oligarchy. Try to catch the image of a band of red-robed religious oligarchy, leading a vast parade of souls behind them, along a wide road, paved and polished, toward a broad gate, tall and wide, ever so slowly opening to receive this parade. What lies on the other side of the gate is not Heaven