Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/04/2015 8:30:29 PM PST by pboyington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pboyington

When can we expect to see women on Army’s football team?


2 posted on 12/04/2015 8:33:38 PM PST by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

I am so worried that the men will risk their lives, when they shouldn’t have to, because these women will be a liability to others and this PC/ equality bull pucky may even cost these these women to unnecessarily loose their lives.

I am glad you posted this information. When I was a girl it was important that women who had the ability not be discriminated against simply because the job was not traditional. But putting women in combat positions that they are not qualified for is foolish and morally wrong.


3 posted on 12/04/2015 8:34:46 PM PST by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: advertising guy

Our military has been infiltrated by political pussys and queers.
I am SO GLAD I retired before all of this horsechit!!!!!!!
I can count the General and Flag officers I have respect for, on one hand with fingers left over! I NEVER thought I would live to see this happen to our military!
Is there not even ONE warrior with integrity (and a set)left in that chithole called DC???? (rhetorical)


4 posted on 12/04/2015 8:35:51 PM PST by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

Our government is replete with fools, degenerates and traitors. Great “leadership”, no?


5 posted on 12/04/2015 8:36:02 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

Now that Obama has set the world on fire he wants the military neutered just as he has done to the police.


6 posted on 12/04/2015 8:36:03 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

As DAC used to say...this will only hurt for a little while, I’ll only put the.....

Oh well you can look the rest up.


9 posted on 12/04/2015 8:44:41 PM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington
oh yeah??? just wait till you see female SEALS!!!
11 posted on 12/04/2015 9:18:42 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy

Ping ...


13 posted on 12/04/2015 9:28:56 PM PST by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington; Flag_This; lulu16; MagUSNRET; Lake Living; advertising guy

Carters attachment to an ideology fueled by arrogance and premeditated ignorance does not constitute a long period of study and vigorous debates as he claims. This tragedy of women in combat provides another reason I now always council men to never enter the armed forces. Social engineering that amalgamates GLBT acolytes and feminist aspirants everywhere has now become the over arching imperative to which all operational capabilities must submit.

Combat operations entail applying and enduring unimaginable brutality until victory. Therefore, only the highest physical abilities and most severe restrictions on human emotions and behaviors can foster the required high morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion required. Human sexuality simply cannot intrude into this one dimensional world where only those displaying the greatest savagely can hope to win. Resorting to war for national defense entails the ultimate Olympics, so there is much less excuse for merging men and women into this environment than exists for the athletic competitions every four years.

Combat forms personnel into small, rigid, task oriented units. These people continuously face extraordinary stress punctuated by killing other humans. At the point of collision, they face environments requiring extraordinary physical capabilities and unbelievably demanding sacrificial, primitive and intimate relations. Such environments are inherently chaotic and brittle. They can be overcome only by a totalitarian leadership and narrow focus unimaginable for those who see any opportunity for social engineering.

The regimental combat teams for infantry, mechanized and armored units are now the playthings of bureaucrats committed to equal opportunity, and dismissive of warriors enduring the brutal carnage imperative for victory. Institutional memories no longer exist for fighting ferocious, shrewd enemies such as the Germans, Japanese, Chinese, and North Vietnamese, who utilized a full array of modern weapons. If one notes the ribbons on any senior officer’s uniform, they show they fought Arabs the Israelis beat three times at 20 to 1 odds, and never fought the enemies mentioned. Such people now question the necessity of high standards which already allow inferior female performance.

Women not only do not belong at the pointy end of the spear, but should not be holding it to the extent the combat arms must depend on their savagery. As this tragedy unfolds remember the quote that, Men sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

Why Marines, unlike Army and Navy, are so against women in combat
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2015/0911/Why-Marines-unlike-Army-and-Navy-are-so-against-women-in-combat?cmpid=editorpicks&google_editors_picks=true

General Martin E. Dempsey
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Dempsey

Gen. Dempsey: If Women Can’t Meet Military Standard, Pentagon Will Ask ‘Does It Really Have to Be That High?’
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gen-dempsey-if-women-can-t-meet-military-standard-pentagon-will-ask-does-it-really-have

Coed Combat Units - A bad idea on all counts
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/coed-combat-units_697822.html

You’re In the New Army Now
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2013/01/youre-in-new-army-now.html


14 posted on 12/04/2015 10:21:49 PM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

This is what women in combat will look like in the real world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxzd7kKm91c


16 posted on 12/04/2015 10:43:34 PM PST by soupbone1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

Save for later


17 posted on 12/04/2015 10:50:12 PM PST by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington
IIRC, he also said they would have to qualify using the same standards the men were held to.

Ergo, problem solved.

18 posted on 12/05/2015 3:20:03 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

When the body bags pile up high enough, there will be a reversion to common sense.


21 posted on 12/05/2015 5:02:37 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington
This is happening not because women want combat roles. They want combat billets. They want them because advancement is seen to depend on having been in one. This is all about uniformed feminist bureaucrats slithering into higher profile general officer positions, selling the country and their fellow military short to climb the careerist ladder. Self-aggrandizement uber alles!
22 posted on 12/05/2015 5:57:30 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

So much for the Ranger tab having any meaning. Its use was already questionable, but cine all the Rangers fail to stand up for the tab and instead prefer to keep their careers all comfy, they wussed out. Ranger = Only if it is politically expedient to be one.


24 posted on 12/05/2015 8:34:40 AM PST by CodeToad (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

So much for the Ranger tab having any meaning. Its use was already questionable, but since all the Rangers fail to stand up for the tab and instead prefer to keep their careers all comfy, they wussed out. Ranger = Only if it is politically expedient to be one.


25 posted on 12/05/2015 8:35:09 AM PST by CodeToad (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pboyington

I think they will institute the underhand Grenade throw next, or maybe reduce the weight of some grenades so women can throw as far as men.


26 posted on 12/05/2015 8:41:20 AM PST by ABN 505 (Right is right if nobody is right, and wrong is wrong if everybody is wrong. ~Archbishop Fulton John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson