Posted on 11/10/2015 8:59:58 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Despite Donald Trump’s meteoric rise to the top of the Republican presidential polls, the GOP establishment continues to bash its leading candidate. Apparently “party-cide†is contagious: The Democratic establishment continues to ride the sinking Clinton campaign like the string quartet on the deck of the Titanic — the majority of Americans know she’s a liar and don’t trust her. It’s a fight to the death all right, only each party’s pointing a gun at its own head.
GOP establishment favorite Jeb Bush is hemorrhaging voters too. CBS News/YouGov shows Bush coming in a pathetic eighth place in New Hampshire and doing only marginally better in Iowa, where he now places fifth.
As an attorney who’s worked for Trump (I have not represented him for the past year and a half) — and many years ago, against him — his success on the campaign trail comes as no surprise: Trump’s a man of exceptional tenacity and guts, insightful intuitions, clear purposes, an intelligence that’s expressed forcefully and directly, always without regard to political correctness, and a world class negotiator. Trump intuitively understands what troubles Americans and boldly states their concerns; I guarantee he’ll never be an appeaser of foreign governments; there’ll be no Neville Chamberlains or hapless apprentices for domestic or foreign policy, in his administration — if you’re not doing your job, you’ll be fired.
Coming off President Obama’s massive failures, most recently his hugely dangerous appeasement of Iran (and funding of the terrorist regime), Americans hunger for Trump’s common sense approach, especially when coupled with his incorruptibility: Trump doesn’t need donors (let alone a foundation to function as money generating, influence-peddling machine), and when he says politicians are forever hitting him up for money...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Three times the charm!
ring the bell and they will salivate
Excellent point.
All I hear out in public is Trump’s name as the one everyone is supporting for President. I don’t hear any other name mentioned for President. I talk politics everywhere. I also hear Cruz’s name mentioned as a favorite for VP.
I believe so. The Presidency is the brass ring, and competition for it heats up (as we've seen) much earlier. Also, the money generally isn't there for hyper-extended Congressional campaigns.
As to your other points: true, Trump is no pure conservative, like Cruz appears to be. There will doubtless be things that he does, and people that he appoints, with whom actually conservatives disagree.
But this election is different, and not just because of the odd-ball characters involved on both sides. In fact, the odd-ball characters are a symptom of how different this election is. This will be a watershed election, and will likely be compared to 1932 and 1980. People clearly sense that we are very close to going off the rails - not the least reason for which is that we have a President, most of his administration, a lot of people in Congress and most of the media who either don't know it because they are simply too stupid, or don't care (and I'm REALLY giving them the benefit of the doubt in both cases), or they're doing it by design (and, in Obama's case, that is my position - NO ONE is that stupid or uncaring, NO ONE).
Sooooo, enter the common man: that's most of us, the people that get up in the morning and go to work, the folks whose parents and grandparents largely saved this country in WW2 and the Cold War, and who absolutely DO NOT WANT THIS NATION TO GO TITS UP. We all KNOW that insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. So, this time, we're not doing the same thing. This time we DON'T want a career pol, because those guys, either through design, corruption or sheer stupidity, put us in this mess in the first place. Off the lifeboats for you! Who's left with a chance in the Republican primaries? Fresh faces, some pols (like Cruz and Rubio) and some not (Trump & Carson). The rest are somewhat entertaining flotsam that will soon be jettisoned. Rubio won't make it - because of the immigration issue and because (as Cruz will point out in ads) he's done little else of note. Carson, while a nice guy and a smart one, is not Presidential timber. He has NO foreign policy experience, no managerial experience and no negotiating experience. He's the Chauncey Gardener of this campaign (from the film "Being There" with Peter Sellers). Hillary will destroy him if he's the nominee, and I think that most people understand that.
So, we're basically left with Trump and Cruz. The question then becomes: "Which one has the better chance of being elected?" I believe that the answer is Trump. The conservative in me recoils at a NYC resident who cavorted with and donated to a bunch of the worst Dims in the country being President, but NYC was where he was and he had to deal with it - as a businessman, not a pol. An advantage of that is that he knows who these people are, from an outside perspective, and I firmly believe that he despises them. Additionally, while Trump is hard to label from a conventional American political POV, I would say that he's best labelled as a "Nationalist." That will be a hugely (or should I say, "YUGELY") refreshing change from the America-hating, world-government loving, Moslem-enabling jackass now occupying the WH, and it is why I believe that he will win.
The Dims won't, of course, go without a fight, and the nastiest one possible, but they will be shown the door and told not to let it hit them in the ass. Ironically, IMHO, the Dims have become the status quo party, the one that doesn't want things to change AT ALL, because they've mastered DC (at least vs. the incompetent boobs with an "R" after their names). As such, they have a choice between a washed-up old hag with substantial legal difficulties who is the very definition of a "lying sack of $hit," and a washed up, grumpy old Socialist from Vermont who still has his very annoying and thick Brooklyn accent despite not having lived there in 47 years. Wow, what a great choice! Trump will beat either of them, or even a "drafted" Biden/Warren team if Shrillary implodes or has a stroke.
So, IMHO, Trump is our next President. Also IMHO, the best move that he can make is to take Cruz as his Veep, because that'll give the ticket a little DC gravitas, plus a man who is basically married to the Constitution and who is possibly the only person in the field smarter than Trump. Cruz will keep Trump on the straight and narrow Constitutionally (VERY important after Obama), will guide him on Federal judicial nominees, will act as liason/whip with Congress, and he will also help Trump clean house in the bureaucracy. Another clear advantage to that from the POV of conservatives is that Cruz will be the clear favorite in 2024 (or even 2020 if Trump decides that he's had enough of the corrupt idiots in DC by then).
Just my $0.02.
One thing that Trump does exceedingly well is that he surrounds himself with competent people and does not suffer fools or incompetents gladly. His "You're Fired" routine is not just for his TV reality show, he actually does this in real life.
That's why I'm not concerned when Trump can't name the leaders of terrorist groups. He'll hire people that can and he'll give them the power they need to take care of business.
“He’s soooooo “committed†that he’s been married 3 times!
Tells me all I need to know.”
Compare and contrast with Obama, who was only married once.
I hope you see that it is largely an irrelevant factor.
Don’t confuse domestic turmoil for vision or competence. Trump has his flaws, to be sure - like everyone else has, since the beginning of time until the end. The real question is whether he is the best in the field NOW who is also electable.
Me, personally, I’d like Cruz to be President. But I don’t think he’s electable, not in this cycle. I have learned that General George S. Patton, Jr. was right:
“The Perfect is the enemy of the Good.”
Let’s not toss away a fantastic manager with great negotiating skills, a love for this country and a vision to restore its greatness because of a few personal foibles or problems.
Life is too short to be trapped in a miserable marriage.
As well, both Trump and Reagan treated their ex-wives with magnanimity and respect and were honest enough to properly take responsibility for their failed marriages. Contrast that to a Bill Clinton who stayed married to one woman yet engaged in multiple instances of extra-marital activity while in the process of treating all his women like dishrags.
Nobody has ever accused Donald Trump or Ronald Reagan of sexual harassment, assault and other scandalous behavior.
Yet you appear to hold somebody like Bill Clinton in higher regard because he stayed married in what is obviously a loveless marriage of convenience.
I guess you didn’t vote for Reagan then.
Not everyone views divorce the way you do...
But then I guess you can happily vote for Hillary since she has stayed married to Bill all these years
Roger that.
It was a dare to use that tag line and I willingly took it
I don’t believe he will disappoint on court appointments....but he is no blue dog democrat.
Yes he is more conservative than ALL of the GOPe.
He is also more conservative than many ‘know it alls’ will acknowledge
“Who is hitching their stars to Trump to ride in on the anti-establishment charge?”
"The Dims won't, of course, go without a fight, and the nastiest one possible,..."
It will be spectacular because they know there's a good chunk of their troops that will vote Trump.
As I recall, Reagan divorced once—not three times.
Me too. Trump and Cruz. I have never heard anyone talk about Carson.
Reagan was divorced once. Everyone can make a mistake.
Thanks for that image :-)
Trump divorced twice. Is there a litmus test? One divorce is okay, more than one is not?
Actually, he is thrice divorced.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.