Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rossi has been granted US patent on the E-Cat (LENR, Cold Fusion)
An Impossible Invention ^ | August 25, 2015 | Mats Lewan

Posted on 08/25/2015 9:08:35 AM PDT by Normandy

Today Andrea Rossi was granted a patent on his LENR based heating device the E-Cat. I have not yet had time to study the patent further, but I just wanted to make it available here on the blog as soon as possible. Note that LENR is not mentioned explicitly, but also note that the contents of the fuel mix are specified — lithium and lithium aluminium hydride as fuel and “a group 10 element, such as nickel in powdered form” as the catalyst. This is important since fuel and catalyst specifications have been lacking from earlier patent applications by Rossi on the E-Cat, as far as I know. The patent, which has the filing date March 14, 2012, can be downloaded here: https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/us9115913b1.pdf


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: andrearossi; coldfusion; ecat; lenr; matslewan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Red Badger
It would be nice to believe that if one is first as an inventor, fame and riches will flow automatically. Unfortunately, the truth is that the early stages of a major new technology commonly involve bitter and disruptive fights over money and credit for the innovation. Such struggles can have large consequences and do not always result in a win by the inventor.

For example, based on patent language, the Wright brothers sued and battled in the press against Glenn Curtiss for his use of ailerons as an alternative control mechanism to the wing-warping favored by the Wrights. The ensuing business turmoil tarnished the Wright's legacy, impaired the US aviation industry in its formative period, and prompted federal intervention and a forced settlement during WW I.

Similarly, Thomas Edison was in many ways less an inventor than a patent troll backed by rapacious Wall Street mercenaries. And there is good reason to regard Alexander Graham Bell as not the inventor of the telephone but the thief of brilliant pioneering work by impoverished Italian immigrant Antonio Meucci. He sued Bell and was nearing victory in court when he died in 1889 and the legal action was extinguished. Bell thus got the credit and the money that rightfully belonged to Meucci.

Nicolai Tesla offers perhaps the most famous example of an inventor done wrong. Tesla's patents for radio issued in 1900 and were foundational to the field, leading to US Patent Office rejection of Marconi's rival claims. Marconi though forged ahead, gaining attention and advancing the field through practical demonstrations. He also raised a great deal of money from influential English and American investors.

Without adequate reason and in circumstances that hint at corruption, in 1904 the US Patent Office reversed itself, voided Tesla's radio patents, and approved Marconi's patents. Almost four decades later, a few months after Tesla died, the US Supreme Court ruled that his radio patents were valid. Marconi's fame remains undisturbed though, cemented in history by a Nobel Prize award in 1911 that Tesla arguably deserved instead.

These kinds of cautionary tales for inventors can be easily added to by anyone willing to endure reading business histories and patent cases. Much of Rossi's odd and frustrating behavior seems due to typical inventor paranoia, with the need to gain publicity and attract investors and commercial allies at odds with an even more compelling urge to maintain secrecy until fame and wealth as an inventor are assured.

I surmise that Rossi's innovation is for real. If so, then the issuance of his patent will do much to spur its commercial development. He and his partners would surely deserve fame, success, and wealth if they have cracked the puzzle of how to make cold fusion work even before its physics are accepted and understood. If so, they will help inspire a wave of innovations that press against and expand the boundaries of science.

21 posted on 08/25/2015 5:22:46 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Shipstone???


22 posted on 08/25/2015 10:22:14 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ozark Tom

Yep! Your a Heinlein fan?......................


23 posted on 08/26/2015 6:08:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ozark Tom

http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=1381


24 posted on 08/26/2015 6:12:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Can you give us an update?


25 posted on 04/25/2016 3:08:43 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Rossi and his US financier and partner, Industrial Heat, have had a falling out and are in litigation. The independent test report is said to be favorable, with its the release though now delayed by the litigation. The dispute between Rossi and IH seems to assume that Rossi’s invention is for real and highly valuable.


26 posted on 04/25/2016 5:43:12 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

What happened to this ‘amazing’ technology?

I went to the Rossi fanboy site as a lark and they are still churning out announcements, any day now!

What a fraud.


27 posted on 03/15/2018 4:59:49 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lx; Wonder Warthog

I was pondering this the other day and then the phone rang. Thanks for the reminder.

WW-ping.


28 posted on 03/15/2018 5:12:44 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lx; mad_as_he$$
"What a fraud."

What part?? The field is much, much wider than "just Rossi".

Non-trivial experiments continue to be done that indicate "something" is going on. Best horse in the commercial race at this point is Brillouin, whose technology has been "checked" (not replicated) by SRI.

Non-commercial work done by Holmlid using a totally different approach than Rossi is yielding positive results. I am not sure what the "state of replication" of his work is, as I haven't checked in a while.

And experiments by many using approaches similar to Rossi's continue to indicate over unity results. COP's not nearly as high as Rossi claimes (typically around 1.5, but well above the limits of experimental error of measurements).

I would still bet that an LENR approach will get to a usable product before the hot fusioneers.

29 posted on 03/15/2018 8:31:52 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson