Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Twin Peaks: Recused judge’s lawyer offends client and attorney gagged by order [Waco]
Radio Legendary ^ | July 30, 2015

Posted on 07/30/2015 8:13:38 AM PDT by don-o

Dallas – McLennan County’s criminal justice community is not trying to “scheme against” defendants in the Twin Peaks shooting, said a lawyer appointed to represent a judge recused in the case.

A supplemental pleading to the 10th District Court of Appeals cites those remarks as evidence a gag order is unconstitutional and unworkable, according to the lawyer who filed the court papers.

“Mr. (Matthew) Clendennen and his counsel are subject to the gag order entered by the Judge of the 54th District Court, Matt Johnson, and cannot publicly speak to this matter of grave public concern to our justice system. Nevertheless, the agent for Judge Peterson is permitted to give statements to the press at will,” wrote F. Clinton Broden, his attorney.

Waco attorney David Deaconson said in a news story about the search for Peterson’s replacement following his recusal in an examining trial to discover probable cause in Clendennen’s case that there is a belief that “the county is totally trying to scheme against these people” is unfounded and that “examining trials are not needed unless defendants are in jail and seeking another way out.”

On the contrary, Broden wrote, Clendennen is seeking an examining trial so that “an innocent person can be promptly cleared of criminal charges wholly lacking in individual probable cause.”

Judge Peterson charged the 177 defendants arrested on a “fill-in-the-blank” affidavit of warrantless arrest in which only the person’s name differered from any of the others. The only allegations of probable cause are that the person so charged is a member of a “motorcycle gang” and was wearing distinctive “colors” identified by the Department of Public Safety as those of an outlaw gang. Clendennen is a member of the Scimitars, a Cossacks support club that is not listed in the DPS manual published at Texas A&M University.

He declared that “this is yet another example of why the gag order in this case is unworkable and one that has arisen since the filing of the Original Petition” because “McLennan County judges (Judge Strother and Judge Peterson through his agent) are not bound by the gag order entered by Judge Johnson and continue to make statements to the media.”

Clendennen is “denied free speech rights to address why he is seeking an examining trial despite the fact that he is not ‘in jail and seeking another way out.’”

At the time when the first shot rang out at the Twin Peaks Restaurant on May 17, Clendennen ran from the patio area and hid inside the building during a bloody melee that left 9 dead, 20 wounded, and is one of 177 persons charged with the identical offense of engaging in organized criminal activity that led to capital murder and/or aggravated assault.

A first degree felony, the offense is punishable by a possible minimum of 5 years imprisonment or a maximum of a life term upon conviction.

“For the reasons set forth in the Petition and for the foregoing reasons, Mr. Clendennen submits that Judge Johnson’s gag order is unconstitutional and unworkable and that the Writ of Mandamus should be issued.”


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: rikkir
bar·gain /ˈbärɡən/ noun noun: bargain; plural noun: bargains 1. an agreement between two or more parties as to what each party will do for the other.
21 posted on 07/30/2015 5:50:15 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: don-o; All
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has updated its website to include the brief filed in the Clendennen gag order case.

In re Clendennen amicus action

The state was ordered, on July 16, to file a response within 14 days. It is possible that the state will file a motion to extend time, which would certainly be granted because the court won;t render a decision without hearing from opposing parties who appear to be noticing the court.

22 posted on 07/31/2015 7:08:32 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

The Clenednnen case seems to be the only one that is active at all. Are the rest just waiting to see how it plays out?


23 posted on 07/31/2015 7:54:40 AM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: don-o
There is only one gag order, so only one gag order appeal.

There are at least 20 pending examining trials, one of which is Clendennen. See Retired judge sought to hear Twin Peaks bikers' examining trials - Waco Trib - July 28, 2015

   Matthew Clendennen, Hewitt
   Daniel Pesina, San Antonio
   Mitchell Bradford, Gordon
   Juventino H. Montellano, San Antonio
   Joseph Ortiz, San Antonio
   Richard R. Donias, San Antonio
   Lawrence Garcia, San Antonio
   John Guerrero, San Antonio
   Tom M. Mendez, San Antonio
   John R. Wilson, Waco
   Clayton D. Reed, Burleson
   Matthew R. Folse, Dallas
   Morgan J. English, Brenham
   William H. English, Brenham
   James A. Venable Jr., Mart
   Royce Van Vleck, San Antonio
   Drew David King, Dripping Springs
   William C. Aikin, Talco
   Jimmy Lee Pond, Austin
   Thomas P. Landers, Georgetown

There was also a hearing for Ronald Atterbury, reported at Biker attorney challenges 'cookie-cutter' arrest warrants - Waco Trib - July 2, 2015. From the report, it reads as a bail hearing, but the questioning veered into probable cause. I think this was NOT an examining trial, at least not in Judge Johnson's view, otherwise the more recent reports would not included remarks about "how rare" examining trials are without mentioning Atterbury's hearing.

Atterbury's 2003 Harley Davidson is/was the subject of a forfeiture action.

There are a few other legal actions floating around, like two negligence suits vs. Twin Peaks (one for the estate of a dead biker, one by Don Carlos for loss of business); the complaint against Peterson pending in the Judicial Commission.

24 posted on 07/31/2015 8:32:09 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All

Feeding the Hussein-licking fascist trolls really muddies up the thread, and they enjoy as well as profit by it.

Let’s prevent one of their evil pleasures whenever we can.


25 posted on 07/31/2015 8:57:29 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Latest from the 10th Appeals Court. No motion for extension of time, by the state. Broden has replied to the state's response. The court will decide if it will entertain oral argument, that decision likely by the end of next week.

   07/31/2015 Reply brief filed Relator  [Relator=Broden/Clendennen]
   07/30/2015 Brief filed - oral argument requested State
   07/29/2015 Supplemental petition for writ of mandamus filed Relator

26 posted on 07/31/2015 4:15:22 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

The Examining Trial is at the end of next week. Right?


27 posted on 07/31/2015 4:46:26 PM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Clendennen's examining trial was set for Monday, August 10 at 2:00 p.m.

With the order to recuse Peterson, that date may be up in the air. I'd take that as the earliest.

28 posted on 07/31/2015 4:51:39 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Must Clendennen's Lawyer Remain Silent | The Aging Rebel, touches on the contents of both the state's reply and Broden;s response to the state's reply.

I sure would like to find links to the briefs! Meanwhile, Aging Rebel will have to do.

29 posted on 07/31/2015 5:23:26 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Quite a contrast to what is happening in Cincinnati.


30 posted on 07/31/2015 5:59:45 PM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Some parallels too. The DA in both places is working to suppress information from the public.


31 posted on 07/31/2015 6:14:20 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Just bumped into this seven-weeks old article, Lawyer for Twin Peaks defendant asked help of U.S. Attorney, Radio Legendary, June 12, 2015.

The attorney representing Clendennen, one of the Twin Peaks defendants charged with engaging in organized criminal activity during a shootout between police, and members of the Cossacks and Bandidos Motorcycle Clubs, wrote to the U.S. Attorney and the Department of Justice saying that the allegations in the affidavit of warrantless arrest are defective because they specify no individual probable cause that he committed the offense. ...

"I have also been provided credible information that Reyna and members of his staff were told by Waco Police Sgt. J.R. Price that the criminal complaints did not support most of the arrests and that other police officers refused to sign the complaints."

Found while searching for the reply brief filed by Reyna, in the gag order case, and Broden's response to the State's reply.

This is the first I've seen that some of the Waco police are alleged to have recognized the cookie-cutter affidavit as deficient. Looking forward to seeing the the Examining Trial judge follows my speculation, doubling down and finding probable cause where none exists.

If you feel like doing some "legal reading," Suits Against Public Officials in Their Individual Capacity | Federal Practice Manual for Legal Aid Attorneys gives the broad outlines with case citations for immunity to the judges and prosecutor involved in depriving a person of civil rights. The general rule is "absolute immunity for judicial/prosecutorial acts."

32 posted on 08/01/2015 10:13:55 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Judge Sullivan: Some Arrests at 2004 RNC Lacked Probable Cause

Previously posted this thread. Took eight years to get the probable cause ruling in a mass arrest.

33 posted on 08/01/2015 10:55:29 AM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson