To a photographer, down-range from the subject of a photo is at least as important as the subject itself. Photographic composition is an art. There is nothing in a photo by accident.
They are a threat, not a negative light, and the photog, editors and publishers need to be jailed.
This is what they do, and this is an example of how they do it. When they aren't hiding truths from you, or telling you outright lies, they always have the subtle subliminal messages pinging on the edges of your consciousness.
The Liberal Media are the people we need to be fighting. Every one of them is an enemy soldier.
Anyone know the name of the photographer?
Megan Kelly is trying to sell her soul to Get an interview with Hillary Clinton (see Variety) and is thus going soft on Democrats and defending them more each night, like she did here in confronting Coulter.
She’s also trying to get a fat contract at CNN in 2017, so she is slowly evolving into another liberal like other Fox blondes who did the same move (and sadly, some guys like Major Garrett who is now at CBS asking soft questions at the White House.)
“Five of the photos show Mr. Cruz with images of a pistol pointing at his head and upon consideration we have decided to remove those photos from further licensing through AP Images, our commercial photo syndication business.”
Of course, the worst part about cross breeding Chrissy Matthews and Pajama Boy is that neither of them would object to the process....
Sorry.
There’s so many ads running on that site, the video is unwatchable.
I found a YouTube link here:
https://youtu.be/KV7J6-_44oY
Found it, his name is Charlie Neibergall. Can’t find his photo though.
A commercial with a little girl picking flowers right before a nuke goes off?
The website is too cluttered with crap. What was in the video or photo that Ann objected to?
These were, we recall, the same folks who had public apoplexy when a Sarah Palin graphic used surveyors' marks that resembled crosshairs during the Giffords fiasco. They know exactly what they're doing.
This doesn’t seem any different to me than things like using images of a person for target practice, or that Sarah Palin thing from a few years back with crosshairs or such. All in bad taste, in my opinion.
http://hillbuzz.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/screen-shot-2011-01-08-at-3-05-33-pm.png
_____________________________________________
THEN, TWO DAYS before the shooting!...
KOS: My CongressWOMAN [Giffords] voted against Nancy Pelosi! And is now DEAD to me!
dailyKOS via google cache ^
_____________________________________________
AFTER the shooting! (can't make this stuff up)...
Sarah Palin's Culpability in Attempted Assassination of Giffords
by BJ Rudell
Sat Jan 08, 2011 at 12:23:13 PM PST
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/1/8/934315/-Sarah-Palins-Culpability-in-Attempted-Assassination-of-Giffords
Were i to photoshop a picture of B.H.obammy with say a 6.5X52mm
Italian Carcano m91/38 bolt action rifle, the kind Oswald killed Kennedy, I’d bet the secrert service would be all over my ass.
But aim a howitzer at Cruz or Walker and all is peachy.
I think the pictures are lame. Much ado about bad photo journalism.
